All People
All Categories
{'name': 'Adapting to change āļø ', 'count': 5, 'people_count': 5, 'sources_count': 5, 'quotes': [{'text': 'The human story does not always unfold like an arithmetical calculation on the principle that two and two make four. Sometimes in life they make five, or minus three, and sometimes the blackboard topples down in the middle of the sum and leaves the class in disorder and the pedagogue with a black eye. The element of the unexpected and the unforeseeable is what gives some of its relish to life, and saves us from falling into the mechanic thraldom of the logicians.', 'person': 'Winston Churchill', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Churchill-Walking-Destiny-Andrew-Roberts/dp/1101980990'}, {'text': 'A crisis is a terrible opportunity to waste. I used that crisis as an opportunity to rebuild Airbnb from the ground up.', 'person': 'Brian Chesky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/@The-Art-of-Hiring/videos'}, {'text': "I\xa0break the record for being wrong. But itās OK. Be wrong and make mistakes, but learn.\xa0Iāll always change my mind based on new data. Never emotions, just data.\xa0Itās not unusual for me to give my opinion at a partnersā meeting, but then hear a counter-argument from a young associate and say: āWait a second. I like that argument better than I like my argument.ā I never feel like I need to prove I am the smartest guy in the room. You can be a genius and be right a lot, or allow yourself to be wrong but surround yourself with smart people who, as a team, will kick the butt of the genius. Teams always win. I'm sure about that.", 'person': 'Doug Leone', 'source': 'https://articles.sequoiacap.com/2018-06-20-doug-leone'}, {'text': "What happens to the old fellows is that they get a technique going; they keep on using it. They were marching in that direction which was right then, but the world changes. There's the new direction; but the old fellows are still marching in their former direction. ", 'person': 'Richard Hamming', 'source': 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html'}, {'text': 'The cards I was dealt meant I started at a deficit compared to everyone else, but in the end that proved an extraordinary source of inspiration and energy to go on and do the impossible. I am beyond thankful to God for that gift', 'person': 'Masayoshi Son', 'source': 'https://www.ft.com/content/81ca2462-0f65-4881-a4ff-8dd2dc711a49'}], 'people': ['Brian Chesky', 'Doug Leone', 'Masayoshi Son', 'Richard Hamming', 'Winston Churchill'], 'sources': ['https://articles.sequoiacap.com/2018-06-20-doug-leone', 'https://www.amazon.com/Churchill-Walking-Destiny-Andrew-Roberts/dp/1101980990', 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html', 'https://www.ft.com/content/81ca2462-0f65-4881-a4ff-8dd2dc711a49', 'https://www.youtube.com/@The-Art-of-Hiring/videos']}
{'name': 'Ambition ā°ļø ', 'count': 5, 'people_count': 4, 'sources_count': 4, 'quotes': [{'text': 'āAim for Chartresā (Christopher Alexander) ā when doing something, aim to be the best there ever was at it. This compensates for your natural bias, which is to do something mediocre. You have to really aim to be as good as the greats.', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'Quantum Light is a venture fund that invests in startups based on models rather than human judgment. About three years ago, I built a small team that collected extensive data on startups. We trained a machine learning model using data from the 1990s, including founder backgrounds, investor information, STEM background, age, and approximately 300 features per startup. The model predicts which startups to invest in, providing a completely outbound investment list without needing to dive deep into each company. It works well, and I launched it two years ago.', 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZcTLjMTVZ4'}, {'text': 'In numbers, we aim for Revolut to be the number one global bank in 100 countries with 100 million daily active customers and 100 billion in annual revenue.', 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZcTLjMTVZ4'}, {'text': "When your vision of what you want to do is what you can do single-handedly, then you should pursue it. The day your vision, what you think needs to be done, is bigger than what you can do single-handedly, then you have to move toward management. And the bigger the vision is, the farther in management you have to go. If you have a vision of what the whole laboratory should be, or the whole Bell System, you have to get there to make it happen. You can't make it happen from the bottom very easily. It depends upon what goals and what desires you have. And as they change in life, you have to be prepared to change. I chose to avoid management because I preferred to do what I could do single-handedly. But that's the choice that I made, and it is biased. Each person is entitled to their choice. Keep an open mind. But when you do choose a path, for heaven's sake be aware of what you have done and the choice you have made. Don't try to do both sides.", 'person': 'Richard Hamming', 'source': 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html'}, {'text': 'Most entrepreneurs could be more ambitious. Thereās this thing that happens where you have a great idea and you set out to build it, but by the time you do, five other people have beaten you to it ā so itās actually now not as good of an idea. Whereas if you build something thatās really ambitious, you mitigate the amount of competition you may face.', 'person': 'Will Ahmed', 'source': 'https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/lifestyle/article/will-ahmed-whoop-tips-for-success'}], 'people': ['Nabeel S Quereshi', 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'Richard Hamming', 'Will Ahmed'], 'sources': ['https://nabeelqu.co/principles', 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html', 'https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/lifestyle/article/will-ahmed-whoop-tips-for-success', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZcTLjMTVZ4']}
{'name': 'Being creative š§\u200dšØ ', 'count': 4, 'people_count': 3, 'sources_count': 3, 'quotes': [{'text': 'Figure out what gives you new ideas, and make sure you incorporate that into your routine. For me this is talking to people, tweeting, writing in my notebook, long conversations with friends (especially late night or while walking). For other people this is showering, baths, long walks, runs, etc. Make sure you āharvestā these ideas too, i.e. write them down somewhere so they donāt get lost. ', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'The process reinforced Muskās appreciation for the toy industry. āThey have to produce things very quickly and cheaply without flaws, and manufacture them all by Christmas, or there will be sad faces.ā He repeatedly pushed his teams to get ideas from toys, such as robots and Legos. As he walked the floor of the factory, he spoke to a group of machinists about the high-precision molding of Lego pieces. They are accurate and identical to within ten microns, which means any part can easily be replaced by another. Car components needed to be that way. āPrecision is not expensive,ā he says. āItās mostly about caring. Do you care to make it precise? Then you can make it precise.ā', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': 'At just after 4 p.m. on June 16, just three weeks after Musk came up with the idea, the new assembly line was rolling Model 3 sedans out of the makeshift tent. Neal Boudette of the New York Times had come to Fremont to report on Musk in action, and he was able to see the tent going up in the parking lot. āIf conventional thinking makes your mission impossible,ā Musk told him, āthen unconventional thinking is necessary.ā', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': 'I wish I had a more creative gene. Iām a linear thinker. The moment I ask a question, my brain automatically grows into tree structure.\xa0I can see all the branches and roots, but there could be something out of left field that I donāt see. This is why I often force myself to do things that Iām not inherently good at, to exercise different parts of my brain. I will sit in front of the piano and mess around with chords. I love spending time with people who are different from me, just listening to what they come up with. It helps make me more open-minded.', 'person': 'Doug Leone', 'source': 'https://articles.sequoiacap.com/2018-06-20-doug-leone'}], 'people': ['Doug Leone', 'Elon Musk', 'Nabeel S Quereshi'], 'sources': ['https://articles.sequoiacap.com/2018-06-20-doug-leone', 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles', 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281']}
{'name': 'Career š¼', 'count': 95, 'people_count': 18, 'sources_count': 25, 'quotes': [{'text': 'Donāt over-index on trends. Just figure out your first-principles view of whatās actually important for the world, and go from there.', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'Status is fake and transient. Just focus on substance and doing valuable work. Talk about it in public. Beware the inner ring fallacy. ', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'Move to where the action is. Agglomeration effects are powerful. ', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'Working with people you really respect, and are secretly worried are much better than you and will figure out how dumb you are, is the best.', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'At some point in your life, work on a startup, or at least a thing driven by a small group. Small group energy is amazing.', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'If you find yourself dreading Mondays, quit.', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'Pay attention to your production/consumption balance. If youāre only consuming and not producing, fix that.', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'Think about what makes you āimbalancedā as a personality, & do things where this gives you an edge.', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': '[On the ideal age to start a company] If you look at statistics, under 25 is quite negative. Between 25 and 30 is okay. The best age is 30 to 35. After 35, thereās a clear negative correlation with success. The sweet spot for founders is 25 to 35.', 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXubBqd8uXs'}, {'text': 'I donāt think money makes you happier. Money is just an additional instrument to achieve certain goals.', 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXubBqd8uXs'}, {'text': '[On advice for young people] First, know what you like and enjoy doing. Then go into that area. If you enjoy something, you definitely need to go there.', 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXubBqd8uXs'}, {'text': "And, at the end of the day it comes down to the impact you have on the lives of others and finding purpose in your life. And so the favorite book I hand out to our founders is Man's Search for Meaning, by Viktor Frankl, and this idea that you need to find what it is that truly motivates you and money does not motivate. And at the end of the day, you can't remain forever addicted to the ego accomplishments. The accomplishments that are all just personal and driven on yourself. So for me, that's been at work as a steward. What kind of a team can I help recruit at Sequoia? And will they remember for being wise and kind and fair, and then you think about your family and your friends, and have you been a good, loyal friend? Have you been kind and generous and supportive of the rest of your broader family? And most importantly, will I be remembered as a good father by my children and a good husband by my wife?", 'person': 'Roelof Botha', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQAZ3iV3gSg&list=TLGGp__Zzi2H69UzMTEwMjAyNA'}, {'text': "If I had to boil it down to one thing, expand the time horizon over which you're thinking...because if you make a series of relatively short sighted decisions, you'll make trade-offs that are relatively safe, and you'll end up in your mid-40s with the midlife crisis. So think about that arc of what you can do...", 'person': 'Roelof Botha', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQAZ3iV3gSg&list=TLGGp__Zzi2H69UzMTEwMjAyNA'}, {'text': "Nobody is an authority on your potential but you, and at some point, you're going to have to raise your hand and not be timid and ask for the opportunity. Push for the opportunity...", 'person': 'Roelof Botha', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQAZ3iV3gSg&list=TLGGp__Zzi2H69UzMTEwMjAyNA'}, {'text': "The last thing I'll say is you've got to realize that being entrepreneurial is not synonymous with being a founder. So I haven't been a founder, I never started a company. But I've had incredible entrepreneurial experiences.", 'person': 'Roelof Botha', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQAZ3iV3gSg&list=TLGGp__Zzi2H69UzMTEwMjAyNA'}, {'text': "If you only had one opportunity to make a career decision, maybe you want to be a little more conservative and you want to be careful. But that's not the way it is, you have one choice and another choice and another choice. And so it may be that the first opportunity out of the GSB is a little risky, and if it doesn't work out. As long as you work with great people and expand your network, and you open up more doors and more opportunities.", 'person': 'Roelof Botha', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQAZ3iV3gSg&list=TLGGp__Zzi2H69UzMTEwMjAyNA'}, {'text': 'I donāt think the world is prepared for the tidal wave of technological change thatās about to hit over the next handful of years. Primarily because of the advances in AI, companies are being started this year that are going to transform entire industries over the next decade.\n\nIt doesnāt seem hyperbolic to say that we should expect to see very significant breakthroughs in quantum computers, nuclear fusion, self-driving vehicles, space exploration and drug discovery in the next 10 or 20 years. I think we are about to enter the biggest period of transformation humanity has ever seen.\n\nInstead of taking safe, well-paying jobs at Goldman Sachs or McKinsey, our young people should take the lead as the world is being rebuilt around us.', 'person': 'Tom Blomfield', 'source': 'https://tomblomfield.com/post/750852175114174464/taking-risk'}, {'text': "By the way, that's my number one piece of advice if you're going to join a startup, is pick a rocketship. Pick a company that's already working and that not everyone yet realizes that, but you know because you're paying attention, that it's going to be huge. And again, you can usually identify these. But good people know this, and so good people will wait, to see that you're on this trajectory before they join.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': 'And the second piece of advice I give is worry more about what you want to do rather than what you want to be. So often people have in their mind "I want to be congressman by 30" or "I want to make X amount of money by this age," and the people I find that are most successful are the people who say, "Man, I\'m really interested in computers and figuring this stuff out" and then they end up being a Bill Gates, or "I\'m really interested in how to cure this disease," and they, maybe they don\'t end up winning the Nobel Prize but they have an extraordinary career because they\'re just interested in the thing itself.', 'person': 'Barack Obama', 'source': 'https://www.linkedin.com/news/story/barack-obamas-best-career-advice-5661620/'}, {'text': "One reason per-project procrastination is so dangerous is that it usually camouflages itself as work. You're not just sitting around doing nothing; you're working industriously on something else. So per-project procrastination doesn't set off the alarms that per-day procrastination does. You're too busy to notice it. The way to beat it is to stop occasionally and ask yourself: Am I working on what I most want to work on? When you're young it's ok if the answer is sometimes no, but this gets increasingly dangerous as you get older.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/greatwork.html'}, {'text': "Since there are two senses of starting work ā per day and per project ā there are also two forms of procrastination. Per-project procrastination is far the more dangerous. You put off starting that ambitious project from year to year because the time isn't quite right. When you're procrastinating in units of years, you can get a lot not done.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/greatwork.html'}, {'text': 'Try to finish what you start, though, even if it turns out to be more work than you expected. Finishing things is not just an exercise in tidiness or self-discipline. In many projects a lot of the best work happens in what was meant to be the final stage.', 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/greatwork.html'}, {'text': "It's usually a mistake to lie to yourself if you want to do great work, but this is one of the rare cases where it isn't. When I'm reluctant to start work in the morning, I often trick myself by saying I'll just read over what I've got so far. Five minutes later I've found something that seems mistaken or incomplete, and I'm off.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/greatwork.html'}, {'text': "For example, while you must work hard, it's possible to work too hard, and if you do that you'll find you get diminishing returns: fatigue will make you stupid, and eventually even damage your health. The point at which work yields diminishing returns depends on the type. Some of the hardest types you might only be able to do for four or five hours a day.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/greatwork.html'}, {'text': "Even when you've found something exciting to work on, working on it is not always straightforward. There will be times when some new idea makes you leap out of bed in the morning and get straight to work. But there will also be plenty of times when things aren't like that. You don't just put out your sail and get blown forward by inspiration. There are headwinds and currents and hidden shoals. So there's a technique to working, just as there is to sailing.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/greatwork.html'}, {'text': 'But while you need boldness, you don\'t usually need much planning. In most cases the recipe for doing great work is simply: work hard on excitingly ambitious projects, and something good will come of it. Instead of making a plan and then executing it, you just try to preserve certain invariants. The trouble with planning is that it only works for achievements you can describe in advance. You can win a gold medal or get rich by deciding to as a child and then tenaciously pursuing that goal, but you can\'t discover natural selection that way. I think for most people who want to do great work, the right strategy is not to plan too much. At each stage do whatever seems most interesting and gives you the best options for the future. I call this approach "staying upwind." This is how most people who\'ve done great work seem to have done it.', 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/greatwork.html'}, {'text': "If you're making something for people, make sure it's something they actually want. The best way to do this is to make something you yourself want. Write the story you want to read; build the tool you want to use. Since your friends probably have similar interests, this will also get you your initial audience.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/greatwork.html'}, {'text': "What should you do if you're young and ambitious but don't know what to work on? What you should not do is drift along passively, assuming the problem will solve itself. You need to take action. But there is no systematic procedure you can follow. When you read biographies of people who've done great work, it's remarkable how much luck is involved. They discover what to work on as a result of a chance meeting, or by reading a book they happen to pick up. So you need to make yourself a big target for luck, and the way to do that is to be curious. Try lots of things, meet lots of people, read lots of books, ask lots of questions.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/greatwork.html'}, {'text': "Let's talk a little more about the complicated business of figuring out what to work on. The main reason it's hard is that you can't tell what most kinds of work are like except by doing them. Which means the four steps overlap: you may have to work at something for years before you know how much you like it or how good you are at it. And in the meantime you're not doing, and thus not learning about, most other kinds of work. So in the worst case you choose late based on very incomplete information. The nature of ambition exacerbates this problem. Ambition comes in two forms, one that precedes interest in the subject and one that grows out of it. Most people who do great work have a mix, and the more you have of the former, the harder it will be to decide what to do.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/greatwork.html'}, {'text': 'The three most powerful motives are curiosity, delight, and the desire to do something impressive. Sometimes they converge, and that combination is the most powerful of all.', 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/greatwork.html'}, {'text': "Boldly chase outlier ideas, even if other people aren't interested in them ā in fact, especially if they aren't. If you're excited about some possibility that everyone else ignores, and you have enough expertise to say precisely what they're all overlooking, that's as good a bet as you'll find.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/greatwork.html'}, {'text': "Once you've found something you're excessively interested in, the next step is to learn enough about it to get you to one of the frontiers of knowledge. Knowledge expands fractally, and from a distance its edges look smooth, but once you learn enough to get close to one, they turn out to be full of gaps.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/greatwork.html'}, {'text': 'Develop a habit of working on your own projects. Don\'t let "work" mean something other people tell you to do. If you do manage to do great work one day, it will probably be on a project of your own. It may be within some bigger project, but you\'ll be driving your part of it. What should your projects be? Whatever seems to you excitingly ambitious. As you grow older and your taste in projects evolves, exciting and important will converge. At 7 it may seem excitingly ambitious to build huge things out of Lego, then at 14 to teach yourself calculus, till at 21 you\'re starting to explore unanswered questions in physics. But always preserve excitingness. There\'s a kind of excited curiosity that\'s both the engine and the rudder of great work. It will not only drive you, but if you let it have its way, will also show you what to work on. What are you excessively curious about ā curious to a degree that would bore most other people? That\'s what you\'re looking for.', 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/greatwork.html'}, {'text': "The way to figure out what to work on is by working. If you're not sure what to work on, guess. But pick something and get going. You'll probably guess wrong some of the time, but that's fine. It's good to know about multiple things; some of the biggest discoveries come from noticing connections between different fields.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/greatwork.html'}, {'text': 'The first step [to doing good work] is to decide what to work on. The work you choose needs to have three qualities: it has to be something you have a natural aptitude for, that you have a deep interest in, and that offers scope to do great work.', 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/greatwork.html'}, {'text': 'Some things you could do are the following. Somewhere around every seven years make a significant, if not complete, shift in your field. Thus, I shifted from numerical analysis, to hardware, to software, and so on, periodically, because you tend to use up your ideas.', 'person': 'Richard Hamming', 'source': 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html'}, {'text': "Let me summarize. You've got to work on important problems. I deny that it is all luck, but I admit there is a fair element of luck. I subscribe to Pasteur's luck favors the prepared mind. I favor heavily what I did. Friday afternoons for years - great thoughts only - means that I committed 10% of my time trying to understand the bigger problems in the field, i.e. what was and what was not important. I found in the early days I had believed this and yet had spent all week marching in that direction. It was kind of foolish. If I really believe the action is over there, why do I march in this direction? I either had to change my goal or change what I did. So I changed something I did and I marched in the direction I thought was important. It's that easy.", 'person': 'Richard Hamming', 'source': 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html'}, {'text': 'I thought hard about where was my field going, where were the opportunities, and what were the important things to do. Let me go there so there is a chance I can do important things.', 'person': 'Richard Hamming', 'source': 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html'}, {'text': "We didn't work on time travel, teleportation, and antigravity. They are not important problems because we do not have an attack. It's not the consequence that makes a problem important, it is that you have a reasonable attack. ", 'person': 'Richard Hamming', 'source': 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html'}, {'text': 'You have to risk career-ending failure to find career-defining success. There are just some people who are willing to do that, and they want the ride. They want excitement. They want the adventure. They want the challenge.', 'person': 'Jason Droege', 'source': 'https://jcnews.substack.com/p/scaling-innovation-tips-from-uber'}, {'text': 'The world is filled with good quests that require massively leveled heroes to complete:\xa0 semiconductor manufacturing, complex industrial automation, natural resource discovery, next-generation energy production, low-cost and low-labor construction, new modes of transportation, general artificial intelligence, mapping and interfacing with the brain, extending the human lifespan. These future-defining problems are hard to recruit for, difficult to raise money for, and nearly impossible to build near-term businesses around, which is why they are exactly the types of problems we need the most well-resourced players pursuing.', 'person': 'Trae Stephens and Markie Wagner', 'source': 'https://www.piratewires.com/p/choose-good-quests'}, {'text': 'For our best players with exceptional fundraising and hiring superpowers, hard quests are difficult. But for everyone else, they are nearly impossible. Therefore, there is a moral imperative for our best players to choose good, hard quests.', 'person': 'Trae Stephens and Markie Wagner', 'source': 'https://www.piratewires.com/p/choose-good-quests'}, {'text': 'Almost all of these founders have deep personal motivations to keep building, even while they have no financial incentive to do so. Throwing yourself into another decade-long project of frenetic building canāt just be about making more money, especially when you already have more money than you can spend in a single lifetime. Some find motivation in revenge, others in a āhigher calling,ā and still others in a compulsive need to build. Innovation is a business for the imbalanced and troubled more than silver-tongued politicians and gala-attending thinkfluencers.', 'person': 'Trae Stephens and Markie Wagner', 'source': 'https://www.piratewires.com/p/choose-good-quests'}, {'text': 'History is the record of top players completing good quests. The vast majority of quests, even during times of great progress, constitute what functionally amount to economic noise. At the same time the Wright brothers were experimenting with flight, a sea of successful financiers filed paperwork that shuffled numbers on the global spreadsheet. Such men worked hard ā maybe ā and still their efforts were forgotten. But from planes and power plants to medicine and light, the achievements of those men and women who embarked on good quests built the modern world.', 'person': 'Trae Stephens and Markie Wagner', 'source': 'https://www.piratewires.com/p/choose-good-quests'}, {'text': 'But unless you are a truly generational thinker, proselytizing is far less impactful than building a specific, better version of the future.', 'person': 'Trae Stephens and Markie Wagner', 'source': 'https://www.piratewires.com/p/choose-good-quests'}, {'text': "And for the rare successful operators who do go on to start a new company, most opt to copy a successful product and compete for market share. Today, the market is overrun with luxury credit cards and task management tools. While often lucrative, these are also generally bad quests. While the players may profit from winning market share from existing companies, they've allocated talent (including their own) and resources away from hard, important problems.", 'person': 'Trae Stephens and Markie Wagner', 'source': 'https://www.piratewires.com/p/choose-good-quests'}, {'text': "The impact of a player's abilities particularly matters with hard quests, where the likelihood of success is already slim. If someone with no background in nuclear physics, no money, and no network chooses not to work on nuclear fusion it doesnāt really matter. In fact, their chances of success were so low that pursuing such a goal would have actually been bad ā an opportunity cost, where they could have worked on a more natural fit that would have enriched their lives and the lives of those around them. But if a talented nuclear physicist with compelling insights into the field, ample resources, and many well-connected peers decides to open a tiki bar in Bali that is an extraordinarily bad quest.", 'person': 'Trae Stephens and Markie Wagner', 'source': 'https://www.piratewires.com/p/choose-good-quests'}, {'text': 'In the context of your quest, you can think of yourself as a player with specific resources, skills, and powers. These attributes influence the likelihood of you succeeding on your quest. For example, if you are a recent engineering graduate, you might have some computer science skills, and a lot of energy. On the other hand, if you are an older repeat founder, you might have less energy, and more familial commitments, but a large network of potential employees, management experience, and enough social capital to raise a large amount of money for an unproven idea.', 'person': 'Trae Stephens and Markie Wagner', 'source': 'https://www.piratewires.com/p/choose-good-quests'}, {'text': 'I started a company because I was obsessed with solving a problem. I was playing squash while I was at Harvard and I felt like I didnāt know what I was doing to my body. I used to overtrain and I got interested in how you could prevent this. I did an enormous amount of physiology research ā I read something like 500 medical papers ā not knowing I was going to start a company.', 'person': 'Will Ahmed', 'source': 'https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/lifestyle/article/will-ahmed-whoop-tips-for-success'}, {'text': 'here is an alternative path for society: ignore the culture war. ignore the attention war. make safe agi. make fusion. make people smarter and healthier. make 20 other things of that magnitude. start radical growth, inclusivity, and optimism. expand throughout the universe.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://twitter.com/sama/status/1655249663262613507?s=20'}, {'text': '- go work somewhere at the heart of the action. the AI scale-ups are going to be the best place to learn about the quickly-unfolding industry.', 'person': 'Alexandr Wang', 'source': 'https://twitter.com/alexandr_wang/status/1637638567467044864?s=20'}, {'text': 'Both Musk and Stark were the type of men who āhad seized an idea to live by and something to dedicate themselves toā and were not going to waste a moment.', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-SpaceX-Fantastic-Future/dp/006230125X'}, {'text': 'His fears that mankind had lost much of its will to push the boundaries were reinforced one day when Musk went to the NASA website. Heād expected to find a detailed plan for exploring Mars and instead found bupkis. āAt first I thought, jeez, maybe Iām just looking in the wrong place, ā Musk once told Wired. āWhy was there no plan, no schedule? There was nothing. It seemed crazy.ā', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-SpaceX-Fantastic-Future/dp/006230125X'}, {'text': 'Musk often talked fondly about Alexander the Great, and Justine saw him as her own conquering hero. āHe wasnāt afraid of responsibility, ā she said. āHe didnāt run from things. He wanted to get married and have kids early on.ā', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-SpaceX-Fantastic-Future/dp/006230125X'}, {'text': 'He felt as if the public had lost some of its ambition and hope for the future. The average person might see space exploration as a waste of time and effort and rib him for talking about the subject, but Musk thought about interplanetary travel in a very earnest way. He wanted to inspire the masses and reinvigorate their passion for science, conquest, and the promise of technology.', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-SpaceX-Fantastic-Future/dp/006230125X'}, {'text': 'With little prompting, Musk would start expounding on his desire to do something meaningful with his lifeāsomething lasting. His next move had to be either in solar or in space. āHe said, āThe logical thing to happen next is solar, but I canāt figure out how to make any money out of it āā\xa0', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-SpaceX-Fantastic-Future/dp/006230125X'}, {'text': 'If you go back 20 or 25 years, I wish I would have known that there was no need to wait. I went to college. I went to law school. I worked in law and banking, though not for terribly long. But not until I started PayPal did I fully realize that you donāt have to wait to start something. So if youāre planning to do something with your life, if you have a 10-year plan of how to get there, you should ask: Why canāt you do this in 6 months? Sometimes, you have to actually go through the complex, 10-year trajectory. But itās at least worth asking whether thatās the story youāre telling yourself, or whether thatās the reality.', 'person': 'Peter Thiel', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Tools-Titans-Billionaires-World-Class-Performers/dp/1328683788'}, {'text': "This leads to my final suggestion: a technique for determining when you're on the right track. You're on the right track when people complain that you're unqualified, or that you've done something inappropriate. If people are complaining, that means you're doing something rather than sitting around, which is the first step. And if they're driven to such empty forms of complaint, that means you've probably done something good.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/marginal.html'}, {'text': "If I could go back and redo my twenties, that would be one thing I'd do more of: just try hacking things together. Like many people that age, I spent a lot of time worrying about what I should do. I also spent some time trying to build stuff. I should have spent less time worrying and more time building. If you're not sure what to do, make something.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/marginal.html'}, {'text': 'If I had to condense the power of the marginal into one sentence it would be: just try hacking something together.', 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/marginal.html'}, {'text': "Work like a dog being taken for a walk, instead of an ox being yoked to the plow. That's what they miss.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/marginal.html'}, {'text': 'Outsiders are not merely free but compelled to make things that are cheap and lightweight. And both are good bets for growth: cheap things spread faster, and lightweight things evolve faster.', 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/marginal.html'}, {'text': "So if you're an outsider you should actively seek out contrarian projects. Instead of working on things the eminent have made prestigious, work on things that could steal that prestige.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/marginal.html'}, {'text': "Another way to find good problems to solve in one head is to focus on the grooves in the chocolate bar ā the places where tasks are divided when they're split between several people. If you want to beat delegation, focus on a vertical slice: for example, be both writer and editor, or both design buildings and construct them.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/marginal.html'}, {'text': 'More risk is a good thing, not a bad thing. More risk is something most people are afraid of, and itās where the larger opportunity lies. Naseem Talebās talked about it, nonlinear returns matter, and they really are nonlinear.', 'person': 'Vinod Khosla', 'source': 'https://www.thetwentyminutevc.com/vinodkhosla/'}, {'text': 'āSkeptics never do the impossible.ā Thereās real doers, which are entrepreneurs and then pontificators, experts, gurus that always say why things canāt be done. I always say, why not? Instead of why it canāt be done. If thereās a 90% chance of failure and thereās a 10% chance of changing the world, thatās a pretty good deal. So go for the 10%. Donāt be scared by the 90% and thatās really hard. Itās challenging. Some days itās really depressing, but itās really, really rewarding and fun. So I could spend the rest of my life working just on those kinds of things.', 'person': 'Vinod Khosla', 'source': 'https://www.thetwentyminutevc.com/vinodkhosla/'}, {'text': 'Personally, if I can have an impact, itās the most valuable thing, most rewarding thing I can do, and Iām always curious to learn about new technologies. Iām a techie nerd at heart.', 'person': 'Vinod Khosla', 'source': 'https://www.thetwentyminutevc.com/vinodkhosla/'}, {'text': 'I want to have fun. So I turned 65 today and I have a plan for the next 20 years.', 'person': 'Vinod Khosla', 'source': 'https://www.thetwentyminutevc.com/vinodkhosla/'}, {'text': 'But almost certainly, great founders have great vision, passion, unreasonableness, more ambition than most practical people would accept as possible or doable.', 'person': 'Vinod Khosla', 'source': 'https://www.thetwentyminutevc.com/vinodkhosla/'}, {'text': 'As a founder, I always say in this presentation I wrote in 1986 thereās a slide that says, āKnow why you want to be a founder.ā And by the way, in those days, slides were overhead projections on acetate. But know why you want to be a founder. You could be a founder because you want to make lots of money. You could be a founder because you have a mission you really care about. Itās the kind of founder we like.', 'person': 'Vinod Khosla', 'source': 'https://www.thetwentyminutevc.com/vinodkhosla/'}, {'text': 'Well, what Iād say to leaders in firms, be clear what your values are, be explicit about them, and stick with them when the going gets hard, when itās hard to practice those values.', 'person': 'Vinod Khosla', 'source': 'https://www.thetwentyminutevc.com/vinodkhosla/'}, {'text': 'I would say two things matter, and theyāre different. One is the mission for a company. Many startups have that, many donāt. Iād say 50/50. And I always tell entrepreneurs be obstinate about your vision, be flexible about your tactics. But that doesnāt speak to the values a company has. Values is focusing on, caring about impact, whether itās positive or negative.', 'person': 'Vinod Khosla', 'source': 'https://www.thetwentyminutevc.com/vinodkhosla/'}, {'text': "Figure out a way to travel to San Francisco and to meet other people who've moved there to pursue their dreams. Why San Francisco? San Francisco is the Schelling point for high-openness, smart, energetic, optimistic people. Global Weird HQ. Take advantage of opportunities to travel to other places too, of course.", 'person': 'Patrick Collison', 'source': 'https://patrickcollison.com/advice'}, {'text': "If you're in the US and go to a good school, there are a lot of forces that will push you towards following traintracks laid by others rather than charting a course yourself. Make sure that the things you're pursuing are weird things that you want to pursue, not whatever the standard path is. Heuristic: do your friends at school think your path is a bit strange? If not, maybe it's too normal.", 'person': 'Patrick Collison', 'source': 'https://patrickcollison.com/advice'}, {'text': "More broadly, nobody is going to teach you to think for yourself. A large fraction of what people around you believe is mistaken. Internalize this and practice coming up with your own worldview. The correlation between it and those around you shouldn't be too strong unless you think you were especially lucky in your initial conditions.", 'person': 'Patrick Collison', 'source': 'https://patrickcollison.com/advice'}, {'text': "Above all else, don't make the mistake of judging your success based on your current peer group. By all means make friends but being weird as a teenager is generally good.", 'person': 'Patrick Collison', 'source': 'https://patrickcollison.com/advice'}, {'text': "If you think something is important but people older than you don't hold it in high regard, there's a reasonable chance that you're right and they're wrong. Status lags by a generation or more.", 'person': 'Patrick Collison', 'source': 'https://patrickcollison.com/advice'}, {'text': 'Donāt follow your passion. Seriously. Donāt follow your passion. Your passion is likely more dumb and useless than anything else. Your passion should be your hobby, not your work. Do it in your spare time. Instead, at work, seek to contribute. Find the hottest, most vibrant part of the economy you can and figure out how you can contribute best and most. Make yourself of value to the people around you, to your customers and coworkers, and try to increase that value every day.', 'person': 'Marc Andreessen', 'source': 'https://www.noahpinion.blog/p/interview-marc-andreessen-vc-and'}, {'text': 'There were basically millennia of just subsistence farming industry and all of a sudden, there was this vertical takeoff a few hundred years ago. And quality of life exploded around the world. Not evenly but starting in Europe and expanding out. Itās basically all technology. Itās always the printing press, itās the internet and on and on. And you get this incredible upward trajectory. We have the potential over the course of the next century or over the next few centuries to really dramatically advance and have life be better for virtually everybody. Technology is quite literally the lever for being able to take natural resources and able to make something better out of them. And so itās just itās the most interesting and by far the most useful and the most beneficial thing I can think of doing.', 'person': 'Marc Andreessen', 'source': 'https://a16z.com/marc-andreessen-on-productivity-scheduling-reading-habits-work-and-more/'}, {'text': 'Suppose I have given an order: who can read the bottom of my thoughts, my true intention? And yet everybody will take hold of that order, measure it by his own yardstick, make it bend to conform to his plans, his individual way of thinkingā¦ And everybody will be so confident of his own version!', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'Do they [men] know themselves, can they explain themselves to themselves?', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'Do you know what I admire most in this world? It is the total inability of force to organize anything. There are only two powers in the world - the sword and the spirit. By spirit I understand the civil and religious institutionsā¦ In the long run, the sword is always beaten by the spirit.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'I may have had many projects, but I never was free to carry out any of them. It did me little good to be holding the helm; no matter how strong my hands, the sudden and numerous waves were stronger still, and I was wise enough to yield to them rather than resist them obstinately and make the ship founder. Thus I never was truly my own master but was always ruled by circumstances. This is so true that when, at the beginning of my reign, during the Consulate, my true friends and most enthusiastic champions asked me, with the best intentions and for their own guidance, where I was heading, I always answered that I had not the least ideaā¦ The fact was that I was not master of my actions, because I was not so insane as to attempt to bend events to confirm to my policies. On the contrary, I bent my policies to accord with the unforeseen shape of the events, and this is what often gave me the appearance of fickleness and inconsistency, of which I have been accused at times; but were these accusations fair?', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'Why and how are such useful questions that they cannot be asked too often.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': '[On Gustavus Adolphus] So brief a military career has left lasting memories because of the boldness and speed of his movements and the organization and intrepidity of his troops. Gustavus Adolphus acted on the same principles as Alexander, Hannibal and Caesar.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': '[On Caesar] He took great risks in the adventures into which he was pushed by his boldness; his genius got him out of his difficulties. His battles in the Civil War - thatās what I call real battles, taking into account the enemies he had to fight as well as the qualities of their generals. He was a man whose genius and boldness were equally great.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'It is axiomatic in the art of war that the side which remains behind its fortified line is always defeated. Experience and theory agree on that point.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': '[Returning from his military debut at Toulon] āI still was far from considering myself a superior man.ā And he repeated that it was only after Lodi [1796] that he conceived the first ideas of high ambition, and that this ambition fully revealed itself only on the soil of Egypt, after the victory of the Pyramids and the capture of Cairo, etc. āThen indeed,ā said he, āI felt that I could abandon myself to the most brilliant dreams.ā', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'A big secret is that you can bend the world to your will a surprising percentage of the timeāmost people donāt even try, and just accept that things are the way that they are. People have an enormous capacity to make things happen. A combination of self-doubt, giving up too early, and not pushing hard enough prevents most people from ever reaching anywhere near their potential.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/how-to-be-successful'}, {'text': 'The most impressive people I know have strong beliefs about the world, which is rare in the general population.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/productivity'}, {'text': "āSuccessful people create companies. More successful people create countries. The most successful people create religions.ā I heard this from Qi Lu; I'm not sure what the source is. It got me thinking, though - the most successful founders do not set out to create companies. They are on a mission to create something closer to a religion, and at some point it turns out that forming a company is the easiest way to do so.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/successful-people'}, {'text': 'I think a vision that someone feels compelled to make happen in the world is probably the most important of a super successful founder. Then this idea of relentless resourcefulness: āThat thing is so important to me that Iām going to figure out how to get it done, whatever it takes. Whatever I need to learn. Whoever I need to convince.ā Thatās really important.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/how-to-be-successful'}, {'text': 'If you believe that going to space is the most important project for humanity, then work on it. If you canāt figure out how to raise hundreds of millions of dollars, go work for SpaceX (joining a great company is a much better plan than starting a mediocre one). If enterprise software is what you really love, then work on that.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/value-is-created-by-doing'}, {'text': 'It doesnāt matter how fast you move if itās in a worthless direction. Picking the right thing to work on is the most important element of productivity and usually almost ignored.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/productivity'}, {'text': '[On Uniting Europe] that achievement was my mission. I had prepared it long in advance, perhaps at the cost of my popularity. ', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}], 'people': ['Alexandr Wang', 'Barack Obama', 'Elon Musk', 'Jason Droege', 'Marc Andreessen', 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'Napoleon', 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'Patrick Collison', 'Paul Graham', 'Peter Thiel', 'Richard Hamming', 'Roelof Botha', 'Sam Altman', 'Tom Blomfield', 'Trae Stephens and Markie Wagner', 'Vinod Khosla', 'Will Ahmed'], 'sources': ['http://www.paulgraham.com/greatwork.html', 'http://www.paulgraham.com/marginal.html', 'https://a16z.com/marc-andreessen-on-productivity-scheduling-reading-habits-work-and-more/', 'https://blog.samaltman.com/how-to-be-successful', 'https://blog.samaltman.com/productivity', 'https://blog.samaltman.com/successful-people', 'https://blog.samaltman.com/value-is-created-by-doing', 'https://jcnews.substack.com/p/scaling-innovation-tips-from-uber', 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles', 'https://patrickcollison.com/advice', 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/', 'https://tomblomfield.com/post/750852175114174464/taking-risk', 'https://twitter.com/alexandr_wang/status/1637638567467044864?s=20', 'https://twitter.com/sama/status/1655249663262613507?s=20', 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-SpaceX-Fantastic-Future/dp/006230125X', 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230', 'https://www.amazon.com/Tools-Titans-Billionaires-World-Class-Performers/dp/1328683788', 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html', 'https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/lifestyle/article/will-ahmed-whoop-tips-for-success', 'https://www.linkedin.com/news/story/barack-obamas-best-career-advice-5661620/', 'https://www.noahpinion.blog/p/interview-marc-andreessen-vc-and', 'https://www.piratewires.com/p/choose-good-quests', 'https://www.thetwentyminutevc.com/vinodkhosla/', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXubBqd8uXs', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQAZ3iV3gSg&list=TLGGp__Zzi2H69UzMTEwMjAyNA']}
{'name': 'Critical thinking š ', 'count': 3, 'people_count': 2, 'sources_count': 2, 'quotes': [{'text': "I approach everything from first principles. Hiring experienced executives didn't work for me, so I abandoned the traditional approach. Instead, I developed everything from scratch based on my experience. Naturally, things didn't work as expected initially, so I iterated until I found the best way to do things. We documented everything in playbooks.", 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZcTLjMTVZ4'}, {'text': 'As he stewed about the absurd price the Russians wanted to charge, he employed some first-principles thinking, drilling down to the basic physics of the situation and building up from there. This led him to develop what he called an āidiot index,ā which calculated how much more costly a finished product was than the cost of its basic materials. If a product had a high idiot index, its cost could be reduced significantly by devising more efficient manufacturing techniques.', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': 'āWe would talk about how we were going to qualify an engine or certify a fuel tank, and he would ask, āWhy do we have to do that?āā says Tim Buzza, a refugee from Boeing who would become SpaceXās vice president of launch and testing. āAnd we would say, āThere is a military specification that says itās a requirement.ā And heād reply, āWho wrote that? Why does it make sense?āā All requirements should be treated as recommendations, he repeatedly instructed. The only immutable ones were those decreed by the laws of physics.', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}], 'people': ['Elon Musk', 'Nikolay Storonsky'], 'sources': ['https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZcTLjMTVZ4']}
{'name': 'Culture š', 'count': 2, 'people_count': 2, 'sources_count': 2, 'quotes': [{'text': 'Memorize a few old poems, or texts that mean a lot to you. ', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': "One of Muratiās favorite movies centers on a rogue AI that kills everyone. 2001: A Space Odyssey (https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0062622/) continues to stir my imagination with its imagery and music, especially in the breathtaking sequence where the space shuttle docks accompanied by the waltz of Johann Straussās Blue Danube Waltz,' she told Time.", 'person': 'Mira Murati', 'source': 'https://www.fastcompany.com/90850342/openai-mira-murati-chatgpt-dall-e-gpt-4'}], 'people': ['Mira Murati', 'Nabeel S Quereshi'], 'sources': ['https://nabeelqu.co/principles', 'https://www.fastcompany.com/90850342/openai-mira-murati-chatgpt-dall-e-gpt-4']}
{'name': 'Customers š', 'count': 1, 'people_count': 1, 'sources_count': 1, 'quotes': [{'text': "They'll like you even better when you improve in response to their comments, because customers are used to companies ignoring them. If you're the rare exception-- a company that actually listens-- you'll generate fanatical loyalty. You won't need to advertise, because your users will do it for you.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/startuplessons.html'}], 'people': ['Paul Graham'], 'sources': ['http://www.paulgraham.com/startuplessons.html']}
{'name': 'Decision-making š ', 'count': 43, 'people_count': 5, 'sources_count': 5, 'quotes': [{'text': '[What happens when insights or questions are withheld?] Each time an insight or fact is withheld or an appropriate question is suppressed, the decision-making process is less good than it might have been.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What complicates decision-making in complex issues?] When knowledge and position power are separated, both groups may feel uncertain, with knowledge holders uncomfortable with business factors and position holders unsure of technical details.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[How does fear of being overruled affect junior managers?] Junior managers may hang back due to fear of losing face if their position is vetoed or opposed by a senior manager or peers.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[Why are people reluctant to voice opinions?] One reason people are reluctant to state an opinion is the fear of going against the group by stating an opinion that is different from that of the group.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[How can the peer-group syndrome be addressed?] If the peer-group syndrome manifests itself, and the meeting has no formal chairman, the person who has the most at stake should take charge. If that doesnāt work, the senior person present can assume control.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What fear paralyzes decision-making?] One thing that paralyzes both knowledge and position power possessors is the fear of simply sounding dumb.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What undermines effective decision-making?] People didnāt really speak their minds freely, making it harder for a manager to make the right decisions.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[How can self-confidence help overcome peer-group syndrome?] Self-confidence stems from being familiar with the issue, having experience, and realizing that nobody has ever died from making a wrong business decision or being overruled.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[How does consensus develop in peer groups?] Groups often wander around, feeling each other out, waiting for a consensus to develop before anyone risks taking a position.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What is the peer-group syndrome?] The peer-group syndrome occurs when a group of peers meets to solve a problem or make a decision but goes in circles without progress because members are afraid to stick their necks out.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[How should dramatic decision changes be handled?] If the final decision is dramatically different from expectations, adjourn, reconvene the meeting after people have had a chance to recover, and solicit their views of the decision.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[Why is group decision-making onerous but necessary?] Group decisions do not always come easily, and the process can be onerous, but it is essential to ensure the decision is well-considered and broadly supported.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What is the criterion for decision timing?] Donāt push for a decision prematurely. Make sure you have heard and considered the real issues, but if you feel all sides have been raised, it is time to push for consensus or make a decision.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What happens if decisions are vetoed unexpectedly?] Unexpected vetoes, even if legitimate, create frustration, demoralization, and impressions of political maneuvering, which should be avoided at all costs.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[How can representation balance improve decisions?] In meetings involving multiple interest groups, it is important to give the sides roughly equal representation to ensure an even-handed decision.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What six questions should be addressed before making a decision?] What decision needs to be made? When does it have to be made? Who will decide? Who will need to be consulted prior to making the decision? Who will ratify or veto the decision? Who will need to be informed of the decision?', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[Why is it important to avoid premature decisions?] If you either enter the decision-making stage too early or wait too long, you wonāt derive the full benefit of open discussion.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What happens in organizations without consultation?] In organizations where decisions are made and implemented individually without consultation, it creates chaos as everyone is free to act unilaterally.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': "[What is the manager's role in decision output?] Decision-making has an output, which is the decision itself, and it is likelier to generate high-quality output in a timely fashion if expectations are clearly set at the outset.", 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What happens when no consensus is reached?] If the decision-making process has proceeded correctly, the senior manager can wield position-power authority to make a decision if the clear decision stage is reached and no consensus has developed.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[Why is clarity in decisions important?] When a decision is controversial, obscuring matters to avoid an argument does not avoid conflict but merely postpones it.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[Why is free discussion important?] The greater the disagreement and controversy, the more important becomes the word free. If knowledgeable people withhold opinions, whatever is decided will be based on less complete information and insight.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[Where should decisions ideally be made?] Any decision should be worked out and reached at the lowest competent level, where it will be made by people who are closest to the situation and know the most about it.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[How should status differentials be handled?] In the free discussion stage, everybody should voice opinions and beliefs as equals, forgetting or ignoring status differentials.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What mix of expertise is needed in decision-making?] Decision-making should occur in the middle ground, between reliance on technical knowledge on the one hand and judgment developed through experience on the other.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[Why does Intel promote egalitarianism?] In our business we have to mix knowledge-power people with position-power people daily, and together they make decisions that could affect us for years to come. Status symbols do not promote the flow of ideas, facts, and points of view.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What is the next stage of decision-making?] The next stage is reaching a clear decision. Particular pains should be taken to frame the terms of the decision with utter clarity.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What is required after a decision is made?] Everyone involved must give the decision reached by the group full support, even if they do not agree with it. Commitment to support is essential for the organization to function effectively.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[Why do middle managers struggle with this model?] Middle managers often have trouble expressing their views forcefully, making difficult decisions, and supporting a decision with which they donāt agree.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What is the first stage of decision-making?] The first stage should be free discussion, in which all points of view and all aspects of an issue are openly welcomed and debated.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[How does the rate of change impact decision-making?] The faster the change in the know-how on which the business depends or the faster the change in customer preferences, the greater the divergence between knowledge and position power.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[How did traditional industries approach decision-making?] In traditional industries, authority to make decisions went with responsibility, or position in the management hierarchy.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What is the challenge in knowledge-based businesses?] In businesses that mostly deal with information and know-how, a rapid divergence develops between power based on position and power based on knowledge.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What types of decisions do managers face?] Decisions range from the profound to the trivial, from the complex to the very simple.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[Why do traditional decision-making models fail in fast-changing industries?] If Intel used people holding old-fashioned position power to make all its decisions, decisions would be made by people unfamiliar with the technology of the day.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What happens to knowledge-based power over time?] A young person entering a technical organization possesses a good deal of knowledge-based power, but as he is promoted and time passes, his position power grows while his intimate familiarity with current technology fades.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What is the role of middle managers in decision-making?] The key to success is the middle manager, who not only is a link in the chain of command but also can see to it that the holders of the two types of power mesh smoothly.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[Why is decision-making important?] Making decisionsāor more properly, participating in the process by which they are madeāis an important and essential part of every managerās work from one day to the next.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': "Don't let perfect be the enemy of good, get going, make a decision and iterate.", 'person': 'Roelof Botha', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQAZ3iV3gSg&list=TLGGp__Zzi2H69UzMTEwMjAyNA'}, {'text': "I'm sure many of you heard about the sort of irreversible and reversible decisions type one, type two, I think the irreversible decisions just require an enormous amount of thought and pressure testing...And so you want to take those decisions very seriously and other ones are less consequential, and you can reverse course very easily, and you should make those decisions fast and iterate and learn very quickly.", 'person': 'Roelof Botha', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQAZ3iV3gSg&list=TLGGp__Zzi2H69UzMTEwMjAyNA'}, {'text': 'Throughout the spring and early summer of 2018, he prowled the factory floor, like he had in Nevada, making decisions on the fly. āElon was going completely apeshit, marching from station to station,ā says Juncosa. Musk calculated that on a good day he made a hundred command decisions as he walked the floor. āAt least twenty percent are going to be wrong,and weāre going to alter them later,ā he said. āBut if I donāt make decisions, we die.ā', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': 'Everyone talks about 10x engineers but the real risk for most companies is not whether you can build it, itās if youāre building the right thing. A designer that can distill why a user is adopting and then prototype the most clear version of that insight will save you millions.', 'person': 'Nikita Bier', 'source': 'https://x.com/nikitabier/status/1680336066325393408?s=46&t=qgopL_Y6F84neSIfv-BoPA'}, {'text': 'business boils down to making the better decision time after time after time after time and when you make the wrong call, accepting that you made a mistake, and quickly adapting not much more to it tbh', 'person': 'Alexandr Wang', 'source': 'https://twitter.com/alexandr_wang/status/1652078305024311298?s=20'}], 'people': ['Alexandr Wang', 'Andy Grove', 'Elon Musk', 'Nikita Bier', 'Roelof Botha'], 'sources': ['https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management', 'https://twitter.com/alexandr_wang/status/1652078305024311298?s=20', 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQAZ3iV3gSg&list=TLGGp__Zzi2H69UzMTEwMjAyNA', 'https://x.com/nikitabier/status/1680336066325393408?s=46&t=qgopL_Y6F84neSIfv-BoPA']}
{'name': 'Emailing š§ ', 'count': 5, 'people_count': 2, 'sources_count': 3, 'quotes': [{'text': 'Third, emails relating to topics that are current working projects or pressing issues go into temporary subfolders of a folder called Action. You should only have Action subfolders for the things that really matter, right now. Those subfolders then get used, and the messages in them processed, when you are working on their respective projects in the normal course of your day. Fourth, aside from those temporary Action subfolders, only keep three standing email folders: Pending, Review, and Vault. Emails that you know youāre going to have to deal with againāsuch as emails in which someone is committing something to you and you want to be reminded to follow up on it if the person doesnāt deliverāgo in Pending. Emails with things you want to read in depth when you have more time, go into Review. Everything else goes into Vault. Every once in a while, sweep through your Action subfolders and dump any of them that you can into Vault. (And do the same thing for messages in your Pending folderāmost of the things in there you will never look at again. Actually, same is true for Review.)', 'person': 'Marc Andreessen', 'source': 'https://pmarchive.com/guide_to_personal_productivity.html'}, {'text': "Second, when doing email, either answer or file every single message until you get to that empty inbox state of grace. Not keeping a schedule helps here, a lot, if you can pull it offāyou can reply to a lot of messages with 'Iām sorry, Iām not keeping a schedule in 2007, I canāt commit to that.'", 'person': 'Marc Andreessen', 'source': 'https://pmarchive.com/guide_to_personal_productivity.html'}, {'text': 'First, always finish each of your two daily email sessions with a completely empty inbox. I donāt know about you, but when I know I have emails in my inbox that havenāt been dealt with, I find it hard to concentrate on other things.', 'person': 'Marc Andreessen', 'source': 'https://pmarchive.com/https://pmarchive.com/guide_to_personal_productivity.html'}, {'text': 'Do email exactly twice a dayāsay, once first thing in the morning, and once at the end of the workday.\n\nAllocate half an hour or whatever it takes, but otherwise, keep your email client shut and your email notifications turned off.\n\nAnyone who needs to reach you so urgently that it canāt wait until later in the day or tomorrow morning can call you, or send a runner, or send up smoke signals, or something else.', 'person': 'Marc Andreessen', 'source': 'https://pmarchive.com/guide_to_personal_productivity.html'}, {'text': 'You know, years ago I wrote a little program to look at this, like how quickly our best founders\u200aā\u200athe founders that run billion-plus companies\u200aā\u200aanswer my emails versus our bad founders. I donāt remember the exact data, but it was mind-blowingly different. It was a difference of minutes versus days on average response times.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://conversationswithtyler.com/episodes/sam-altman/'}], 'people': ['Marc Andreessen', 'Sam Altman'], 'sources': ['https://conversationswithtyler.com/episodes/sam-altman/', 'https://pmarchive.com/guide_to_personal_productivity.html', 'https://pmarchive.com/https://pmarchive.com/guide_to_personal_productivity.html']}
{'name': 'Exploring š', 'count': 1, 'people_count': 1, 'sources_count': 1, 'quotes': [{'text': 'I spent 15ā17 years in the UK, and London became home. But after working in different cities, I realized thereās so much more in other cities in terms of lifestyle, infrastructure, and openness. When you live and work in many places, you become more open-minded.', 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXubBqd8uXs'}], 'people': ['Nikolay Storonsky'], 'sources': ['https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXubBqd8uXs']}
{'name': 'Failing š© ', 'count': 2, 'people_count': 2, 'sources_count': 2, 'quotes': [{'text': "When I interviewed at Sequoia, Don Valentine was still alive and he interviewed me and he actually said that he worried that I hadn't faced enough adversity and failed enough before I joined Sequoia. Because he was worried that I wouldn't have the fortitude to deal with adversity of being in our business. Because the truth is, over sequoia's history of over 50 years, about half the time we don't generate a profit on an investment. Now there's a power law that's more dynamic in our industry, and when it works, it works spectacularly. But you fail a lot. And that's hard, because when I was in your shoes, I was used to getting good grades and things kind of just worked. And that's one of the things that I think you will need to face as you embark on your careers. Because if you want to to be exceptional at something, you're probably going to have to push the boundaries. And you're going to be at that edge of incompetence where sometimes you're not going to get it right. But if you stay inside that edge and that boundary, you'll never do something special or exceptional.", 'person': 'Roelof Botha', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQAZ3iV3gSg&list=TLGGp__Zzi2H69UzMTEwMjAyNA'}, {'text': 'Itās OK to be wrong. Just donāt be confident and wrong.', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}], 'people': ['Elon Musk', 'Roelof Botha'], 'sources': ['https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQAZ3iV3gSg&list=TLGGp__Zzi2H69UzMTEwMjAyNA']}
{'name': 'Getting stuff done ā
', 'count': 38, 'people_count': 13, 'sources_count': 16, 'quotes': [{'text': 'Thereās a lot of alpha in being willing to do āmenialā work (take notes, send out agendas, order pizza, manually inspect raw data, whatever). Beware over-delegation and being too far from the details.', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'Doing things is energizing, wasting time is depressing. You donāt need that much ārestā.', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'Doing as much as you can every day is a form of life extension. ', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'Do the most important thing first thing in the morning, and donāt check social media until youāve done it. Because energy compounds, the first actions in the day matter a lot: the right actions get you into a positive spiral, the wrong actions get you into a negative spiral. The further into a negative spiral you get, the harder it is to get out. So if you start the morning by doing something you care about (e.g. writing a page of an essay), you are way more likely to have a good, productive and happy day overall, because youāve gotten yourself into a positive spiral.\n\nMoreover, even if you donāt subsequently do anything, you have at least done that one thing in the day; most people fail more from many days of zero output than they do from not maximizing output on any given day, so the key is to stay consistent.', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/advice'}, {'text': 'Energy compounds on itself. If you start the morning by getting something done (a workout, an important task, writing) then youāre going to have a higher baseline energy day overall. Itās as though the initial thing gives you a persistent āboostā throughout the day. Doing additional things becomes easier. Without this boost, thereās a good chance I get nothing important done that day.\n\nMost peopleās mental models of energy are flawed: they think thereās a ātankā of energy that gets depleted as you spend it. This may be roughly true for physical energy, but mental energy is different: spending mental energy on things that you consider productive or important gives you more mental energy for other things: a positive feedback loop. On the other hand, procrastinating, spending all day scrolling Twitter, or staying in bed all day reduces the amount of energy you have to spend; this means you are less likely to get anything done.\n\nItās common to get trapped in this negative energy feedback loop: you donāt feel like doing something, so you check Twitter for awhile, which reduces your energy levels, which makes you feel worse, but you try and do something anyway, but youāre even less energized now, so you decide to go to bed for a bit to rest, but the rest isnāt restfulā¦ etc.\n\nThe way to get out of these energy ruts is to just do something really small (empty the dishwasher! Write one sentence!) and get that tiny reward of accomplishment. This generates a little bit more energy. Use that spark to get something slightly bigger done, and so on.', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/advice'}, {'text': '[On daily routine] It depends on the country. If Iām in the UK, I wake up at 6:30, sometimes train in the morning, and start work by 8:30 or 9:00 a.m. If Iām in Asia, I start later and work until 11:00 p.m. If Iām in the US, I start early.', 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXubBqd8uXs'}, {'text': 'I have never seen ordinary effort lead to extraordinary results', 'person': 'Alexandr Wang', 'source': 'https://x.com/paulg/status/1856747693688668642'}, {'text': 'Every week he went over the most recent timetables and expressed, often rather strongly, his dissatisfaction. āPretend we are a startup about to run out of money,ā he said at one of these sessions. āFaster. Faster! Please mark anytime a date has slipped. All bad news should be given loudly and often. Good news can be said quietly and once.ā', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': 'Musk held a video call with the Starship team on August 4 from a conference room at Giga Texas, where he was preparing for the annual Tesla shareholder meeting that afternoon. As they walked him through slides, he got increasingly angry. āThese timelines are bullshit, a mega fail,ā he explained. āLike, no fucking way these should take so long.ā He decreed that they would start having meetings on Starship every night, seven daysa week. āWeare going to go through the first-principles algorithm every night, questioning requirements and deleting,ā he said. āThatās what we did to unfuck the bullshit that was Raptor.ā', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': 'By the time Musk got back from the launchpad to the Starbase main building, the video monitor by the front door had been reprogrammed. It read, āShip+Rocket Stacked T ā196h 44m 23s,ā and was counting down the seconds. Balajadia explained that Musk does not let them round off into days or even hours. Every second counted. āWe need to get to Mars before I die,ā he said. āThereās no forcing function for getting us to Mars other than us, and sometimes that means me.ā', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': 'After SpaceXās launch of astronauts to the Space Station in May 2020, it had an impressive run of eleven unmanned successful satellite launches in five months. But Musk, as always, feared complacency. Unless he maintained a maniacal sense of urgency, he worried, SpaceX could end up flabby and slow, like Boeing.', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': 'Nevertheless, he did not try to eliminate all possible risks. That would make SpaceX rockets as costly and late as those built by the governmentās bloated costplus contractors. So he demanded a chart showing every component, the cost of its raw materials, the cost that SpaceX was paying suppliers for it, and the name of the engineer responsible for getting that cost down. At meetings he would sometimes show that he knew these numbers better than the engineers doing the presentation, which was not a pleasant experience. Review meetings could be brutal. But costs came down.', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': 'Musk has a rule about responsibility: every part, every process, and every specification needs to have a name attached. He can be quick to personalize blame when something goes wrong. In the case of the launch failure, it became evident that the leak had come from a small B-nut that secured a fuel line. Musk fingered an engineer named Jeremy Hollman, one of Muellerās first hires, who, the night before the launch, had removed and then reattached the nut in order to get access to a valve. At a public symposium a few days later, Musk described the mistake by āone of our most experienced technicians,ā and insiders knew he was referring to Hollman.', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': 'Musk insisted on setting unrealistic deadlines even when they werenāt necessary, such as when he ordered test stands to be erected in weeks for rocket engines that had not yet been built. āA maniacal sense of urgency is our operating principle,ā he repeatedly declared. The sense of urgency was good for its own sake. It made his engineers engage in first-principles thinking.', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': 'One of Muskās management tactics, then as later, was to set an insane deadline and drive colleagues to meet it. He did that in the fall of 1999 by announcing, in what one engineer called āa dick move,ā that X.com would launch to the public on Thanksgiving weekend. In the weeks leading up to that, Musk prowled the office each day, including Thanksgiving, in a nervous and nervous-making frenzy, and slept under his desk most nights. One of the engineers who went home at 2 a.m. Thanksgiving morning got a call from Musk at 11 a.m. asking him to come back in because another engineer had worked all night and was ānot running on full thrusters anymore.ā Such behavior produced drama and resentments, but also success.', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': "When you're a startup, having a really focused effort, high velocity, moving quickly, getting things out, and learning often is the way to go. We're wrong a lot, all the time, but if you can understand how customers react to it, you can improve and more accurately point the direction and vector of your product. You get a lot further in the right direction a lot faster if you take these super large bets released in multi-month to multi-year cycles.We said, you know what, we are, at times, going to have many different ways of solving the problems. It's going to create some clutter, and we think that's a good thing. We need antibodies and internal mechanisms doing occasional QA to not stop the production and creation of new things, but to be cleaning and sweeping the streets.", 'person': 'Eric Glyman', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxI_S0uOHZM'}, {'text': "I've always had this hygiene of writing a email a letter to the company every weekā¦ it was just my impressions of the week that passed like what did I read, what conference did I go to what anecdote did I hear, what was my piece of research that people loved the mostā¦ sometimes it might be like here's literally what happened this week for me it's actually almost a decompression oflike I'm downloading my brain I'm forcing myself to synthesize a skill that I could get better and better at and then I'm sending that out in the world as my gift to you you don't have to read it but I'm also sending you a little bit of a signal about the pace that I expect us all to be revving at and I've definitely had people say hey get your email at the weekend it kind of implies to me I should be working at the weekend I'm like that might be what I'm implying actually because I haven't been in a company yet that's not in a fight to the death so we need to be working at a pace now I want people to find balance too but my balance is not your balance like you also need to have an accountability for what makes you tick but I feel less stressed when I get that email out on Saturday.\xa0", 'person': 'Sarah Friar', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4nDDprKASA&t=1335s'}, {'text': 'Iāve learned that listening is key. Iām still a terrible listener, but better than I was, and that change has come down to one word: maturity. Success didnāt make me lazy, but it brought me peace. Iām more at peace with the world and myself.', 'person': 'Doug Leone', 'source': 'https://articles.sequoiacap.com/2018-06-20-doug-leone'}, {'text': 'Execution gets divided into two key questions.\xa0One, can you figure out what to do and two, can you get it done.\xa0So I want to talk about two parts of getting it done, assuming that youāve already figured out what to do. And those are focus and intensity. So focus is critical. One of my favorite questions to ask founders about what theyāre spending their time and their money on. This reveals almost everything about what founders think is important.\n\nOne of the hardest parts about being a founder is that there are a hundred important things competing for your attention every day. And you have to identify the right two or three, work on those, and then ignore, delegate, or defer the rest. And a lot of these things that founders think are important, interviewing a lot at different\xa0law firms, going to conferences, recruiting advisers, whatever, they just donāt matter. What really does matter varies with time, but itās an important piece of advice. You need to figure out what the one or two most important things are, and then just do those.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': 'The way to have a company that executes well is you have to execute well yourself. Every thing at a startup gets modeled after the founders. Whatever the founders do becomes the culture. So if you want a culture where people work hard, pay attention to detail, manage the customers, are frugal, you have to do it yourself. There is no other way. You cannot hire a COO to do that while you go off to conferences. The company just needs to see you as this maniacal execution machine. As I said in the first lecture, thereās at least a hundred times more people with great ideas than people who are willing to put in the effort to execute them well. Ideas by themselves are not worth anything, only executing well is what adds and creates value.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': "everything i've learned about operating: trust your gut. act quickly. don't let problems stew.", 'person': 'Alexandr Wang', 'source': 'https://x.com/alexandr_wang/status/1705002729897447736?s=46&t=qgopL_Y6F84neSIfv-BoPA'}, {'text': "Most important advice I give to young people. A is just learn how to get stuff done. What I mean by that is - I've seen at every level people who are very good at describing problems. People who are very sophisticated in explaining why something went wrong or why something can't get fixed. But what I'm always looking for is no matter how small the problem or how big it is somebody who says: 'Let me take care of that'. If you project an attitude of whatever it is that's needed, I can handle it and I can do it, whoever's running that organization will notice, I promise.", 'person': 'Barack Obama', 'source': 'https://www.linkedin.com/news/story/barack-obamas-best-career-advice-5661620/'}, {'text': 'what sets great builders apart is not that they are smarter [lots of people are smart], or even that theyāre better at building itās that they ask the right questions and focus on the right problems. how do you get good at this? practice genuine, deep curiosity', 'person': 'Alexandr Wang', 'source': 'https://twitter.com/alexandr_wang/status/1678114360202280960?s=20'}, {'text': 'By realizing you have to use the system and studying how to get the system to do your work, you learn how to adapt the system to your desires. Or you can fight it steadily, as a small undeclared war, for the whole of your life.', 'person': 'Richard Hamming', 'source': 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html'}, {'text': "The word 'try' is an especially valuable component. I disagree here with Yoda, who said there is no try. There is try. It implies there's no punishment if you fail. You're driven by curiosity instead of duty. That means the wind of procrastination will be in your favor: instead of avoiding this work, this will be what you do as a way of avoiding other work. And when you do it, you'll be in a better mood. The more the work depends on imagination, the more that matters, because most people have more ideas when they're happy.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/marginal.html'}, {'text': "Hacking something together means deciding what to do as you're doing it, not a subordinate executing the vision of his boss. It implies the result won't be pretty, because it will be made quickly out of inadequate materials. It may work, but it won't be the sort of thing the eminent would want to put their name on. Something hacked together means something that barely solves the problem, or maybe doesn't solve the problem at all, but another you discovered en route. But that's ok, because the main value of that initial version is not the thing itself, but what it leads to. Insiders who daren't walk through the mud in their nice clothes will never make it to the solid ground on the other side.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/marginal.html'}, {'text': 'Make things. Operating in a space with a lot of uncertainty is a very different experience to learning something.', 'person': 'Patrick Collison', 'source': 'https://patrickcollison.com/advice'}, {'text': '[On Turenne and Eugene of Savoy] Manoeuvres and marches in the campaigns of 1646, 1648, 1672 and 1673 were based on the same principles of those of Alexander, Hannibal, Caesar and Gustavus Adolphusā¦ The boldness and length of these marches astonished France, and, until they were justified by success, they were the target for the criticism of mediocre men. If he had built bases every thirty leagues, if he had left reserve armies behind, they would have been defeated separately.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'Peril was always in front of me, and the dayās victory was always forgotten in the preoccupation with the necessity of winning a new victory on the morrow.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'Be successful! I judge men only by the results of their actions.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'Let no one search the past for examples that might slow down our advance! Nothing in all history resembles the last years of the eighteenth century; nothing in the last years of the eighteenth century resembles the present moment.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'His [Alexander the Greatās] warfare was methodical and deserves the highest praise. Not one of his convoys was interrupted. His armies always grew as they advanced; they were weakest on the Granicus, at the outset, and they had tripled when they reached the Indus, not counting the troops commanded by the governors of the conquered provinces.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'A man who has lost courage lacks decision because he faces alternatives that are all undesirable. And the worst thing in our enterprises is indecision. ', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'It takes time to make oneself loved, and even when I had nothing to do I always vaguely felt that I had no time to waste. ', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'My wife could have died in Munich or in Strasbourg and it would not have interfered for a quarter of an hour with the execution of my plans.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'The great majority of men attend to what is necessary only when they feel a need for it - the precise time when it is too late.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'I have gained some advantages over superior forces and when totally destitute of everything, because, in the persuasion that your confidence was reposed in me, my actions were as prompt as my thoughts.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'The best clue to Napoloenās aim in life lifes in his curious way of making budgets - and āoutside budgets there is no salvationā. If, for instance, he ordered the construction of some public work or edifice, he would make sure that it was built in stages and that at the end of each stage it could be put to some use, no matter how many years might elapse before the whole was completed. If the wing of a palace, or a stretch of road or canal, could be put to use after the first year, then its cost began to be amortized in the following year and could be charged off by the budget. By the time the whole was completed, it had paid for itself. By this sleight of hand, Napoleon combined long-term objectives with his passion for immediate usefulness.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}], 'people': ['Alexandr Wang', 'Barack Obama', 'Doug Leone', 'Elon Musk', 'Eric Glyman', 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'Napoleon', 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'Patrick Collison', 'Paul Graham', 'Richard Hamming', 'Sam Altman', 'Sarah Friar'], 'sources': ['http://www.paulgraham.com/marginal.html', 'https://articles.sequoiacap.com/2018-06-20-doug-leone', 'https://nabeelqu.co/advice', 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles', 'https://patrickcollison.com/advice', 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/', 'https://twitter.com/alexandr_wang/status/1678114360202280960?s=20', 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281', 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230', 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html', 'https://www.linkedin.com/news/story/barack-obamas-best-career-advice-5661620/', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXubBqd8uXs', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxI_S0uOHZM', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4nDDprKASA&t=1335s', 'https://x.com/alexandr_wang/status/1705002729897447736?s=46&t=qgopL_Y6F84neSIfv-BoPA', 'https://x.com/paulg/status/1856747693688668642']}
{'name': 'Giving back š¤² ', 'count': 2, 'people_count': 1, 'sources_count': 1, 'quotes': [{'text': "But there are a lot of generous people that enabled this great institution so that we could study here and we could launch our careers. And so I think it's with that mindset that we have an obligation also to pay it forward.", 'person': 'Roelof Botha', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQAZ3iV3gSg&list=TLGGp__Zzi2H69UzMTEwMjAyNA'}, {'text': "So I think it's with that mindset that we have an obligation also to pay it forward.", 'person': 'Roelof Botha', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQAZ3iV3gSg&list=TLGGp__Zzi2H69UzMTEwMjAyNA'}], 'people': ['Roelof Botha'], 'sources': ['https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQAZ3iV3gSg&list=TLGGp__Zzi2H69UzMTEwMjAyNA']}
{'name': 'High performance š„', 'count': 7, 'people_count': 4, 'sources_count': 5, 'quotes': [{'text': "And that may sound absurd but what his point was organization as a whole does everything exactly the right way. Then receivers will start running their routes at 7 yards not 8 yards. And that actually will matter. And if every person on the team executes to the same level of performance, you will have a team that is performing at the highest possible level. And at the highest performance level, the team will play at their best. So how to relate this to a company may include a lot of details that do not matter, not seem that they matter superficially. Most people would agree that details matter when faced with the user. But what the real debate it is on things that don't face the use. Steve Jobs famously in the Mac, insisted upon an immaculate circuit board, you can read about this in various books. The Mac, for those of you who don't remember the Mac. Maybe most of you here, but may have seen it. It couldn't be opened. So the circuit board couldn't be seen by any person in the world. There was no way to open the Mac except by the people that worked at Apple.\n\nSteve insisted that it be absolutely perfect and beautiful. That is the sort of detail obsession that building this sort of company requires. ", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': "The final topic I want to talk about is details. And in my assigned reading there is a great book by Bill Walsh, called The Score Takes Care of Itself. And the basic point of the book is that if you get all the details right, you don't worry about how to build a billion dollar business, you don't worry about how to have a billion dollars in revenue, you don't worry about having a billion users. Thats a byproduct of what you do everyday to get the details excellent. So the topics that he talks about in the book that really resonated with me was, he took over the 49ers in 1979. They were the worse team in football, I believe they were 2 in 14 which is really bad if you don't know football. In the next ten years he transformed the team into NFLās best, won three super bowls. And what's the first thing he did to go from the worse team to one of the best in many ways? He actually taught the receptionist to answer the phone properly. He wrote a three page memo on how to answer the phone.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': "The reason why is because\xa0most great people actually are ammunition. But what you need in your company are barrels.\xa0And you can only shoot through the unique barrels that you have. That's how the velocity of your company improves is having barrels. Then you stock them with ammunition, then you can do a lot. You go from one barrel company, which is mostly how you start, to a two barrel company and you get twice as many things done in a day, per week, per quarter. If you go to three barrels, great. If you go to four barrels, awesome. Barrels are very difficult to find. But when you have them, give them lots of equity. Promote them, take them to dinner every week, because they are virtually irreplaceable because\xa0they are also very culturally specific. So a barrel at one company may not be a barrel at another company.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs'}, {'text': "Which is why with young people you don't always need to be so impatient asking for the plum assignment. A lot of times the best way to get attention is whatever is assigned to you, you are just nailing. You're killing it. Because people will notice that's somebody who can get stuff done.", 'person': 'Barack Obama', 'source': 'https://www.linkedin.com/news/story/barack-obamas-best-career-advice-5661620/'}, {'text': 'engineering productivity is far more correlated with culture than team size there are startups w/ 10 engineers that ship more for their customers than big co engineering teams of 1000 (ex: Midjourney) you cannot throw people and/or money at building great things', 'person': 'Alexandr Wang', 'source': 'https://twitter.com/alexandr_wang/status/1648040173631049728?s=20'}, {'text': "Like so many people privy to these performances, Lyons came away with no illusions about Muskās personality but with the utmost respect for his vision and drive to execute. 'Working at Tesla back then was like being Kurtz in Apocalypse Now,' Lyons said. 'Donāt worry about the methods or if theyāre unsound. Just get the job done. It comes from Elon. He listens, asks good questions, is fast on his feet, and gets to the bottom of things.'", 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-SpaceX-Fantastic-Future/dp/006230125X'}, {'text': 'Teams that had worked separately for months back at the Space X factory - propulsions, avionics, software - were thrust together on the island and forced to become an interdisciplinary whole. The sum total was an extreme learning and bonding exercise that played like a comedy of errors.', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-SpaceX-Fantastic-Future/dp/006230125X'}], 'people': ['Alexandr Wang', 'Barack Obama', 'Elon Musk', 'Keith Rabois'], 'sources': ['https://twitter.com/alexandr_wang/status/1648040173631049728?s=20', 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-SpaceX-Fantastic-Future/dp/006230125X', 'https://www.linkedin.com/news/story/barack-obamas-best-career-advice-5661620/', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive']}
{'name': 'Hiring (& retaining) talent š¤ ', 'count': 95, 'people_count': 10, 'sources_count': 14, 'quotes': [{'text': "So each company has it's own velocity on this curve. So if the company is going like this, you can only keep people on the roles if their own learning curve is going like this. On the other hand, if your learning curve is like this, anyone learning faster than that, you can give them the same roles as they do. So always track the individual slope of employee and the company growth rate. Now that you have your barrels figured out, and you can identify people who can take ideas that you have in the back of your head, scope it out, run with it, ship it, and it's perfect. Where do you aim these barrels?", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': 'The other question everybody asks about people is when do you hire somebody above somebody. And when do you mentor somebody, and when do you replace somebody? And the way to think about this is that every company has their own growth rate, and every individual has their own growth rate.', 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': "[On identifying talent] The other signal to look for is once you've hired someone, with an open office, just watch who goes up to other people's desks. Particularly people they don't report to. If someone keeps going to some individual employees desk and they don't report them, it's a sign that they believe that person can help them. So if you see that consistently, those are your barrels. Just promote them, give them as much opportunity as you can.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': "How can you tell who is a barrel and who is not? One is you start with a very small set of responsibilities, it can be very trivial. It can be something like, I want to reward the engineers in my office at nine o'clock every night with a nice cold, fresh smoothie. This is actually a real example. I was frustrated, our engineers were working really hard, and maybe 20%, 30% would stay late in the evening and we had already served them dinner but I wanted to give them something cool to reward them. You can think about alcohol but that's a little complicated. So smoothies were probably a little bit better than pizza, which drains you of energy. But nobody could get smoothies to show up in my office at nine o'clock sharp, that were cold, that tasted good, and that were delivered in the right place that the engineers would find them.\n\nYou would think this is simple but in fact it took two months to get this done. So we had an intern start, and I think on his second day I was explaining this problem, and he said, well I will do it. And I was looking at him like there was no way. I have seen my office manager fail, my assistant fail, who were actually pretty good. This just isn't going to happen. And low and behold they show up. On time, cold, delivered at the right place, and my first instinct was great. Nothing about the smoothies, but now I can actually give him something more important that is more complicated to do.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': "One of the ways, the definition of a barrel is, they can take an idea from conception and take it all the way to shipping and bring people with them. And that's a very cultural skill set.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': "Most great people actually are ammunition. But what you need in your company are barrels. And you can only shoot through the unique barrels that you have. That's how the velocity of your company improves is having barrels. Then you stock them with ammunition, then you can do a lot. You go from one barrel company, which is mostly how you start, to a two barrel company and you get twice as many things done in a day, per week, per quarter. If you go to three barrels, great. If you go to four barrels, awesome. Barrels are very difficult to find. But when you have them, give them lots of equity. Promote them, take them to dinner every week, because they are virtually irreplaceable because they are also very culturally specific. So a barrel at one company may not be a barrel at another company.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': "The next and most important thing you do is edit the team. So these are the people you work with. Nobody is going to have a perfect team and you certainly aren't going to start that way. So what I am going to try to do is maximize the probability of success in editing the team. So I like this idea of barrels and ammunition. Most companies, when they get into hiring mode, as Sam pointed out you should defer that a bit, but when you do just hire a lot of people, you expect that when you add more people your horsepower or your velocity of shipping things is going to increase. Turns out it doesn't work that way. When you hire more engineers you don't get that much more done. You actually sometimes get less done. You hire more designers, you definitely don't get more done, you get less done in a day.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': '[On hiring] I learned how to do it now. Every time I hire for a new role Iāve never hired for before, I first interview the whole market to learn how people do the job. Only after learning how they do the job, I select the best person. If youāve never worked with designers, you have zero skills to hire designers. If youāve never worked in regulatory or government affairs, you have zero skills to assess who is good. To learn the skills, you need to interview as many people in that area as possible, then you learn, and then you select.', 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXubBqd8uXs'}, {'text': "We calculate the number of strong, average, and below-average performers. Our system filters out underperforming individuals, ensuring that Revolute only has high-quality people. It's a well-designed mechanism with the sole goal of maintaining top talent. Everything is quantifiable and process-driven.", 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZcTLjMTVZ4'}, {'text': 'You do not automate first; you need to delete, delete, delete. Get down to simple requirements before you do any of this stuff.', 'person': 'Eric Glyman', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrqo-dAQpfc'}, {'text': 'Sales is a craft. Design is a craft. Engineering is a craft. Great hiring is a craft.', 'person': 'Eric Glyman', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrqo-dAQpfc'}, {'text': 'The team you build is the company you build.', 'person': 'Eric Glyman', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrqo-dAQpfc'}, {'text': "You can build a great interview process, but you're better off just trying to use long-term information about people, if you can.", 'person': 'Eric Glyman', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrqo-dAQpfc'}, {'text': 'We design our products to make very complex things very easy.', 'person': 'Eric Glyman', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrqo-dAQpfc'}, {'text': "You should write unreasonably short job descriptions and know exactly what you're looking for, and make it easy to assess someone's performance on one metric first.", 'person': 'Eric Glyman', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrqo-dAQpfc'}, {'text': 'Discernment is very important... You need to understand when someone is a good designer. What does that mean mechanically? In what sense? In what context?', 'person': 'Eric Glyman', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrqo-dAQpfc'}, {'text': 'If you hire people who are great at their craft, I think and hope they are going to create guilds, people who are dedicated to a certain way of thinking and excellence in something that they do.', 'person': 'Eric Glyman', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrqo-dAQpfc'}, {'text': 'You want someone who is going to pound the table and say, Iām going to go and make this person successful, particularly if they are the hiring manager.', 'person': 'Eric Glyman', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrqo-dAQpfc'}, {'text': 'Question every requirement. Delete any part of the process that you can. Simplify and optimize. Accelerate cycle times. Automate.', 'person': 'Eric Glyman', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrqo-dAQpfc'}, {'text': 'The goal is not zero defects. Often weāre finding, you know, maybe very weird, in some cases malformed... You want to find people who are particularly spiky and on a steep slope.', 'person': 'Eric Glyman', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrqo-dAQpfc'}, {'text': 'Having simple rules for your company will clean a lot of things up.', 'person': 'Eric Glyman', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrqo-dAQpfc'}, {'text': "Follow some simple algorithms and you'll be able to hire at scale.", 'person': 'Eric Glyman', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrqo-dAQpfc'}, {'text': 'The team you build is the company you build.', 'person': 'Eric Glyman', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrqo-dAQpfc'}, {'text': 'Look for slope over intercept every time.', 'person': 'Eric Glyman', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrqo-dAQpfc'}, {'text': 'Before you try to go hire other people, you need to actually do it. You need to actually taste it. You need to have your own perspective on it.', 'person': 'Eric Glyman', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrqo-dAQpfc'}, {'text': 'Find deeply talented, very spiky people, people who are very good at one thing, and think hard about how to put them in roles where they can express that.', 'person': 'Eric Glyman', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrqo-dAQpfc'}, {'text': "Any company at its core, especially technology companies, they're not in the technology business, they're in the people business.", 'person': 'Eric Glyman', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrqo-dAQpfc'}, {'text': 'At Ramp, simplicity is really at the heart of everything that we do.', 'person': 'Eric Glyman', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrqo-dAQpfc'}, {'text': "Final concept, contrarian, I also believe in hiring people who have egos. My general view in the world is almost anybody who's been world class at anything, in any field, has an ego. Now, that doesn't mean you can always tell from afar, but having known a lot of professional athletes, professional DJs, politicians, I've never met a successful person who doesn't have an ego. So this is a famous quote from Michael. But I generally agree with this, so I do not filter, don't recommend filtering people. You want people who want to be winners because you want to build a winning company. And the only way you build a winning company is with winning people.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "Final concept here is I'd much rather hire for new capabilities than more of the same. So if you're struggling as a business, don't just hire X+1 of any role. It's unlikely that person is going to be the breakthrough. However, if you don't have any capability at all, adding a new capability can drive a breakthrough. So I think about are we adding more or are we adding something new and really try to push towards this new, not more.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "I'd rather just keep extending rope, all things being equal to talented people, increasing the degree of complexity and just seeing. That is how you plot the slope. You can start with small things like, you know, my famous, now, example of this smoothie intern at square, who now is CEO of a very good company. A more recent example is when I was moving over from Founders Fund to KV, literally stopped working at Founders Fund at 5 p.m. on Friday and was starting work at KV at 9 a.m. with real meetings on Monday, and, I told my chief of staff, get an office ready. It has to be perfect, ready to go 9 a.m. For those of you who ever opened an office Friday 5 p.m. to Monday 9 a.m. is pretty challenging. You need Wi-Fi. You need to negotiate a commercial lease. You need furniture. You need a lot of things. We actually had signage. So once Jack was successful at that, you can constantly expand so you can find projects that aren't catastrophic to the organization. Like if the office wasn't literally working at 9 a.m. perfectly. It's not like KV would have imploded, but it was a good acid test of under pressure, under stress, under time constraints. Can you do things that other people can't do? Or other people come up with excuses? Then constantly give people more and more complicated opportunities. So I think it's a good way to challenge people is just constantly push the envelope.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "Another Brian Chesky lesson is everybody basically will plateau at some point. So while people are on this slope of progression. You don't want to do anything to interfere with them. You want to promote them, promote and expand their responsibilities constantly, constantly. And everybody will start plateauing. And right around here is when you think about external hires. Brian's technique is can this person think six months ahead? So in any role, are they thinking six months ahead? And that's effectively the same thing as when does the slope plateau, some people think a little bit more naturally and easily and intuitively this way. Some people can think is this person 3, 4, 5, or 6 months ahead?", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "Every time you hire externally there's real risk. Brian will talk more about this in founder mode, that if you hire you're basically doing open heart surgery. And those are very expensive mistakes for a company that is thriving. So I would default to saying no and then only hire when the burden is the other way. And here's how to think about when it is. Basically, every company has its own growth rate, and the better you do, the faster the growth rate. But it's really hard for individual employees to keep up. So perversely, the best companies have this challenge on steroids. So I actually had this slide, a version of the slide, at a Square board meeting, and I had planned at Square to do roughly 50/50, 50% internal promotions, 50% external hires. And Vinod looked back at me and said not going to be possible. And I said, why? Because I had this whole robust plan and thought it through, like about ten pages of board slides. Heās like you guys are growing too fast. No way, no way. You're going to have to do 70/30. It was interesting. He was more right than wrong, actually, because when the company structure is like this, the chance that any even talented person can keep up with that trajectory is really, really small. If a company's growing more normally, like for a healthy company, maybe you can do 50/50. And then there's techniques for scaffolding that, but it's pretty tricky.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "Time. There is no substitute to building the team at the end of the day. I like this exercise. Like, let's try this, 75% of you I know are founders, raise your hand if recruiting is your number one priority. Okay, now, when you go back to your google calendar, go look at your last week or last month and see if the most time you spent was allocated to recruiting. Based upon experience doing with this with a lot of CEOs, if one of your hands is still raised, I'd be shocked. Almost no one maps the importance of recruiting to their time allocation. And it doesn't have to be perfect mapping, but you want it to be as close as possible.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "So, for example, at Square, we were a design driven company, and that's easy to say. But what that actually means is when we're hiring finance people, literally accountants, we actually force them to be design driven. And good luck interviewing accountants and trying to find a design driven accountant. Trust me, it's not easy. But Jack was adamant. He's like, nope, not approving this hire, not approving this hire. They're not design driven. We actually found one, this woman named Lauren. I hired her, talked her out of going to GSB. Turns out she was so design driven that she became our best PM. She now runs a company as CEO, but she started as an accountant. But because we took that criteria seriously, we excluded 99% of the world. If we hadn't taken that criteria seriously, I don't know if she would have got that offer. We might have pulled the trigger on someone else before she even interviewed. So take your cult principles very, very seriously.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "Another lesson about a startup is you're not trying to hire everybody. If you read Zero to One or listen to some Peters talks about cults, you're building a cult and what a cult means is you have views about the world that other people don't agree with. That's what a cult is, a shared understanding of the world that's basically contrarian. And so you only want people who are opting in to the cult. You don't want to try to convince people that don't believe in this religion, and you certainly don't want people who have views that are opposite or traits that are opposite to your cult.\xa0", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "Speed is your friend as a startup on every dimension, but it's especially important in recruiting. So I also wouldn't run in a lengthy interview process. I actually don't think you should almost ever have a candidate meet with more than five people. There's research on this. I won't bore you with all the research, but basically you hit diminishing marginal returns on every incremental person but you compromise your core trait, which is speed, and then you can use investors if you have quality investors on your cap table. Investors, one thing they are good at is helping close.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "Closing. So, Jack Dorsey taught me this question to ask candidates if you really want to send an offer, ask a candidate point blank, is there anything that would prevent you from accepting this offer? It's incredibly effective because a candidate will surface things and sometimes they'll surface things you weren't thinking about, and then you can address them. If you don't know the candidate has hesitations in a dimension that you're not thinking through. You forget to address them. And then all the sudden the candidate turns you down, and then you can try to fix it later, but that rarely works. Call like a 10% save rate on someone who turns you down and you have to go save them versus clarifying upfront", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "The hardest hire for me is usually a VPE. I'm not technical, or at least I haven't been technical since high school, and so making the call on a VPE sometimes for me is difficult. If it's really important, I'll call up someone like Max Levchin who's excellent, and ask him to interview a candidate for me. Now, I can't waste too much of Maxās time, so I have to get it down to two finalists at most. Then I can ask him to interview. You can borrow people that are in your network and ask them to do you a favor and just meet because it only takes a world class person 3 to 30 minutes to evaluate another world class person. Like I'd say it's more 3, but weāll be politically correct and say 30.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "This is a subtle point. I would talk more about this with Brian Chesky, because he's the one who taught me the best answer here. When you're hiring for a skill you don't know, how do you decide? How do you develop taste? The best thing you can do that Brian taught me is go find five people in the world who are awesome. So before you hire a CFO, go find the five best CFOs, and just ask to have coffee with them and just talk to them for 30 minutes. If you meet the five people who are amazing, you will suddenly develop taste. Now you're not going to be perfectly calibrated, but you'll have a pretty good feel for when you're dealing with world class people.\xa0", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "References. I think references are mostly about error avoidance, not about positive. So in other words, you can avoid mistakes with references. I don't think you usually get to a super exciting hire through references. That said, Tony from DoorDash does 20 references for everybody he hires for his team. That's a lot. Think about actually doing 20 references on any key hire. If I'm going to do a reference, I really simplify it. I really want to know, is this person a killer? So I'll actually phrase it that way sometimes just like, is this person a killer? And you can see from the person you're talking to who's the reference. If the person you're trying to hire is, they'll immediately light up, like immediately, the face, the response will be instant. Any other answer, the person is not a killer. So if you need a killer for your team and you want a culture of killers, pass on that candidate.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "The question comes up, do you have to have passion about the company you're recruiting them for? Do they have to have interest in your industry? I actually don't think you should screen that way. I think it's a mistake. Like when I started at PayPal, I knew nothing about financial services. I never thought I'd be a payments person, like I was not interested at all at the time. Now I spent a lot of my next 24 years in payments and financial services. I once interviewed Patrick Collison on stage at a CEO summit, and I asked Patrick this question and he said, look, at the end of the day, it's kind of arrogant of me to assume that you wake up and have some interest in Stripe. It's my job to convey why Stripe is the most compelling thing that you could do with your life. And so I think that's right. But I know there's a lot of debate about this, but I personally don't filter, and I don't even care if they're interested in my company. It's my job to get them interested.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "But anywhere you go, you might run into people who have talent. And in a hot market, you want to find talent wherever you can. You don't have the choice until the markets collapse, then it's easy. The other thing I look for is the trait and this is a concept. It's not as practical and tangible as some of the other comments I made. Can this person positively manipulate the world around them? Just think about when you meet somebody. This is literally how I filter people at Barry's like, does this person have traits that looks like they can positively manipulate the world around them? And when you meet someone who can, you'll know it. Like you just can't miss it. Like it's like there's something about their ability to just reframe the world. But it can be at a very micro level, like the soccer field, or can be a macro level. But that's the most important, I think, ingredient.\xa0", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "So I think figuring out what predicts success is really important. I like risk taking. And it doesn't mean that the person has taken risk before. This is another mistake that's very common. So one of the best people I ever hired actually was working at McKinsey, of all places, about as low risk, boring job. And I because I liked him, he's actually someone I recruited off my soccer team. So I knew him pretty well. And I was like, Jeff, you work at McKinsey, what the hell? I need people who can solve problems here and take risks. He first told me a story of this ridiculous futon startup he did in school. I was like, okay, that's not exactly the risk taking I was thinking of, but good start. But he was my goalie on my soccer team, and it occurred to me that he was the most crazy goalie I'd ever played with in like 40 years of playing soccer. He was a very aggressive goalie, which people are coached to do. But he would also be aggressive about translating defense into offense as fast as possible, which is pretty rare. And it actually occurred to me that if he could do that on a soccer field, it's possible he could learn to do that in a business. So you can get these signals from very random places.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "And I said, you know, Derek, when you meet a rookie for the first time in spring training, can you tell whether they're going to be an all star? He said absolutely every single time. And, I hesitated for a second and I did something I usually don't do, which is I asked a question I don't know the answer to, and I said, how? And he shocked me because I assumed he would talk about, like, someone swing, their technique, blah, blah, blah, something. He's like, nope, just their confidence. And then it was fascinating because as soon as you said that, it made so much sense and I re-derived it, it's like, well, why do you have confidence? Well, your technique and your swing may be actually pretty damn good. Like you actually know when you're batting, you're actually pretty damn good at what you do. But then also there's a lot of mental toughness, resilience is all more critical to success at a high level in most fields than just the technique. And so he combined the two and one really pithy answer.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "So you start learning about someone just by asking them what theyāre optimizing for. The second question I love, especially for mid-level people who have some experience in the world is, if you were CEO of your last company what would you have done differently? Itās my favorite question. It doesn't work for someone right out of college, but post about two to four years, it's a pretty reasonable question. You could see how much of the business they were working on and they absorbed. You can see whether they can think independently, differently. Do they just take conventional wisdom, what their boss or their supervisor or CEO told them, or can they actually derive independent thoughts?", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "So what I'm trying to figure out is does the person have a super power or strength that might make it more probable than not that they can solve the problem I'm suffering through. And do they have the motivation? So I start with motivation. Typically I'll say, so if you're gonna do anything else with your life, what's your criteria? Like what's the filter? And people start talking. You get them talking and you can tell a lot about a person by how they talk about what they care about. There are people who are motivated by money and it will come up every single time.\xa0", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "So let's talk about how do you interview. There are methods you can learn, and there are some books on this that might translate into high tech stuff. I'm not the biggest fan of them. Some of the people in this room have actually interviewed with me. I don't follow a script at all, because what I'm trying to do is figure out what someone's strengths and weaknesses are, and scripts for me don't work. So what I like to do is basically try to match what this person is motivated by and what they're talented at to the problem I have. So I have a business problem which I understand the context of. Any time you're running a company, you understand what the problem you're trying to solve is. It can be a marketing challenge. It could be a product challenge, it could be something. But you know what that problem is. And then what you're trying to basically say is, is this person Iām about to pull the trigger on or could pull the trigger on, do you have an unfair advantage in solving this specific problem?", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': 'So for example, a salesperson is almost never worth hiring early. Almost, almost, never compromise on a first, second sales hire. Although people make this mistake almost every day. ', 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "The other classic question is, okay, I've got this A-minus person, pretty good. I need a VP of marketing. I need a Director of Marketing. I need a design lead. Should I hire the person knowing that theyāre A-minus? Obviously if theyāre B-whatever, you're not going to hire them. But the A-minus or not is, is a classic dilemma. My general advice is there's a difference between a mediocre team and an incomplete team. I would much rather have an incomplete team than a mediocre team. Mediocrity spreads. Mediocrity compounds. Once you have a mediocre team, it's almost impossible to fix. So if you can live with not hiring, I would live with not hiring. There are exceptions. There's corner cases here where like literally there's a role where the entire company will blow up if you don't hire someone. You may have to pull the trigger on the A-minus hire.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "The way Eric framed it to me, which I think is fabulous, is he said I'm not worried about when people are leaving to start their own company. I'll be more worried when those caliber of people don't come to Ramp. And so I think that's the right way. If you're a magnet for the best people on the planet, things will work out pretty well and then challenge them to do as much as possible.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "Other question that comes up is, do you hire people who want to be founders or not? It's very controversial. Ask ten CEOs you're going to get five different answers. Should you hire someone who walks in the door and says, I want to found a company in two years? My answer is yes. So I like to hire these people. These are all people that I hired at Square that went on to found pretty good companies. But a lot of people are afraid as CEO of hiring someone who says, I'm going to leave in two years. The way I look at it is, first of all, these people have more potential. And then secondly, my job is to make sure the company is so interesting, so valuable and such a challenge for any of the employees that they don't want to leave. It is generational potential wealth for them. It's career defining. They're constantly tackling and learning new things. And if they leave, that's my fault. It's not theirs. So I'd encourage you to probably be willing to hire founders, people who are basically prototypical founders, and then make the company so exciting that it's at least 4, 5, 6, 7 years in the future.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "One of the other things that's really important that most people gloss over is to clarify, what are you actually trying to hire for. Now, simplifying a bit. There's two reasons you hire. One is value creation. Then, there's value protection.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "The other way to cheat is hire interns. I don't think you can do it too early. So I think you do need a critical density of people that have some experience in a job somewhere, but interns have more upside than anybody you're going to hire. Because what happens to the best interns is they become founders. And some fraction of those founders become really famous, and then you're never going to hire them. But if you intercept them when they're 16 to 20 years old, they don't know that they're yet ready to found a company and be the next Mark Zuckerberg. So you want to hire them as early as possible. And then we're going to talk about like, how do you find out that they're like high potential?", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "I think what you're likely to do is be accurate first in people that can reliably execute what I call ammunition, they're not that hard to find. You can get them mostly right. The art is can you find these barrels and can you assess them. And barrels are weird people like there's usually a screw loose. So this is why it's hard. If you delegate it too much, it's easy to identify why someone who's a barrel might have something wrong with them. But that doesn't mean that this person can't be the person who creates the most value in the history of the company. I can definitely tell you the people who created the most value in the history of PayPal, are the weirdest people that worked at PayPal.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "So you really need to own this. If you really believe, at the end of the day, the team you build is the company you build, the most important thing you can do is be the arbiter of the team. Now, the more reps you get with something like anything else in life, you're going to get better at it. And sometimes you have to sort of overrule execs or leaders, and they're going to complain because they're going to say, hey, you know, I'm doing great as an engineer, engineering manager, design lead. Why don't you trust me? And the answer is, being great at your craft is not the same skill as assessing some stranger that walks in the door. Now, over time, you hope that you can do both, but often people don't do both very well.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "So I had this hack, which is I went around the organization, I just kind of walked around the office and found the people that I thought were really talented, but that weren't currently kicking ass. And I was like, hey, you want to come over on my team? And it actually worked. So I got like three key people to kind of move over, and they were really good, and the team did really well and I got promoted. But the most important lesson was it wasn't that I couldn't evaluate people because I picked all three really well. It was that I couldn't evaluate strangers. So people in the building, I was pretty accurate at finding these people and moving them on to my team, and then eventually that causes too much friction. So you can't keep doing that.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "I think recruiters are mostly ineffective, but they do create a tempo and a discipline and a cadence that you can take advantage of. So when you're first starting and, and learning how to build a company and recruit, just allocating time ruthlessly, predictably does produce dividends. It's like inputs and outputs. If you've watched my how to operate lecture or read the score takes care of itself, and Mike's going to talk next about inputs. Fundamentally, recruiters drive inputs really well. They will basically ensure that you contact this many people per day that you review these people at this tempo, and getting that cadence working and getting that machine in motion may be worth it, but generally speaking, recruiters are not going to unlock gold. Once in a while, if you hire a recruiter who's phenomenal, you can unlock gold, but they're very, very rare, and it's not so easy from afar to determine that.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "I think the best reason to announce a financing is actually for recruiting. I don't believe that financing announcements typically generate customers. There are rare exceptions, but you shouldn't announce the financing because you think you're going to get customers. It does help bring talent to you. More importantly, it may help you close. People are more willing to join startups that their significant other or their family have heard of. So imagine you're in a relationship and you're joining this crazy company that no one's heard of and it's doing this ridiculous thing. Someone around that person often barfs and says, what the hell are you doing? If you can then send them a link that they can send to their spouse or their partner or their mom, it actually really helps you close.\xa0", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "I think my favorite metaphor for building a startup, and some of you may have heard in my how to operate lecture, is you're creating a movie. So like in the movie case, you need a trailer. Why do people go see movies? They've seen a trailer that looks attractive. So for your startup, you need a trailer. Why is this the most important thing, most interesting thing, most fundamentally, economically, you know, lucrative thingā¦ doesn't matter. But something why the most ambitious, interesting people on the planet should call you and figure out how to frame that. Peter does use this question. He uses this question a lot, which is when he's interviewing founders. He used to say pitch your 20th employee to me. How are you gonna get your 20th employee? Because you can do the first five through handcrafting people you already know and stuff like that. The 20th one, you need a really good trailer, so it's a good test.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "Second thing is what we call gene pool engineering, which is find the places where the people have the skills you want the most currently work. And then go to LinkedIn and go surf all of the profiles of the people that work at those three companies, let's say, and send them an email from you as CEO. That does actually work. But you're also going to need to do more than that.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "So you're going to have a core team. The first day anybody starts, have them write down on a piece of paper the 5 or 10 most impressive people they know, and definitely do it on the first day and then go reach out to those 5 or 10 people. Meta, or Facebook back in the day, used to do this ruthlessly, like completely, from like 2005 to 7. This is how they built Facebook before it was so cool and trendy that, you know, they could use all the other techniques.\xa0", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "When you're a small startup and you're beginning. And most people in this room are not running, you know, one of the top 20 companies on the planet at the moment, when you're a small startup, you need to get attention. You can do some outbound, and I would definitely encourage you to reach out to your network of friends, colleagues, mentors, former classmates. But that's pretty precarious. So at PayPal, we did only hire people who were friends. Like literally, that was the whole philosophy of Peter and Max. Every single person in the company was no more than one degree removed from someone who was a friend. That works if you can be ruthless, merciless, and incredibly disciplined about evaluating your friends. That is not for everybody. It's a very special taste. I actually did learn how to do that. I do it. I do invest in friends. I work with friends. I hire friends.\xa0", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "So the most important lesson I ever learned from Peter Thiel when I joined Paypal was we went for a jog around the Stanford campus. And Peter said, you can't hire anybody over 30. He might not say that exactly the same way today, but basically what he was trying to say by that is by time you're 30, everybody on the planet knows how to assess you pretty accurately because there's enough data points on your resume back then, LinkedIn profile today that everybody can come to a consensus view about your abilities. But if you come to a consensus view about everybody's abilities, guess what? Google is going to spend a lot of money on this person, or OpenAI is going to spend a lot of money on this person, or Meta is going to spend a lot of money on this person. And when you're a startup, you can't outspend large companies that are very profitable or have infinite money, like OpenAI. You need to be much more disciplined, much more frugal. You may not even want to hire these people, the people who are motivated by that much compensation may not even be the right builders.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "So the most important concept is you cannot hire the obvious people. The obvious people have a lot of options in the world and weāre going to talk about why you don't want to hire them, but you've got to get that out of your brain.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "We didn't hire a single person in the company whose skill was managing people. If you were going to lead a design team, you had to be the best designer. You're going to lead the engineering team, you had to be the best engineer. If you're going to lead the finance team, you had to be the best finance person. And we took that seriously and it became contrarian in its own sense. ", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "the team you build is the company you build. And like any good piece of advice, it's kind of something you already know, but it distills it in a really clear way. And especially coming from Vinod, who's a technologist. It really clarified to me don't get distracted ever, with products, markets, design. Everything else doesn't matter if you get the people right. Stripe has a phrase which I really like as well, which is every problem is a people problem. And once you orient your brain around that you realize that all these things you confront, all these challenges you have, if you have the right people, you're likely to solve them. If you have the wrong people, it's almost impossible.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s'}, {'text': "Ernest Shackleton was an expeditionary, like, 100 years ago. He had this giant shipwreck, and famously, all the guys, like, survived. And there's a very famous job posting. And here's the job posting. It says men wanted for hazardous journey. Small wages, bitter cold, long months of complete darkness, constant danger, safe return doubtful, honor and recognition in case of success. Probably the best job ad ever. And that's, I think one thing you should do is just don't sell a rosy picture of the experience of working. Like, why do the most fit people in the world want to be Navy Seals? Because they want the challenge. Now the average person doesn't want a challenge, but the best people want a challenge. And so that will turn off mediocre people and will turn on great people.", 'person': 'Brian Chesky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/@The-Art-of-Hiring/videos'}, {'text': 'I remember Andreessen Horowitz would tell me, you should do eight hours of reference checks per employee, which is probably over the top, but you should probably spend as much time referencing as you do hiring, and the way to find good people is ask any one person who the best people they know are. Then ask those people, then ask those people, and build a talent network. In other words, I think you should be recruiting outside of job openings. If you only recruit for a job opening, then you are going to create like a sales pipeline. And I think hiring is too much like a sales pipeline, and hiring should be more like network building than a sales pipeline.', 'person': 'Brian Chesky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/@The-Art-of-Hiring/videos'}, {'text': 'A players hire A players, B players hire lots of C players.', 'person': 'Brian Chesky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/@The-Art-of-Hiring/videos'}, {'text': 'You are as good as the people you hire because hopefully, you learn from them.', 'person': 'Brian Chesky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/@The-Art-of-Hiring/videos'}, {'text': 'Everything starts from within: inner peace, a drive to succeed, order. But it requires the courage to admit what you are and what you arenāt.\xa0I know my own limitations, what I can and canāt do.\xa0If you admit your own weaknesses, you can surround yourself with people who are better than you, and the greater good is stronger.', 'person': 'Doug Leone', 'source': 'https://articles.sequoiacap.com/2018-06-20-doug-leone'}, {'text': "So, the question is, how do you balance firing people fast and making early employees feel secure? The answer is that when an employee's not working, it's not like they screw up once or twice. Anyone will screw up once or twice, or more times than that, and you know you should be like very loving, not take it out on them, like, be a team, work together.\n\nIf someone is getting every decision wrong, that's when you need to act, and at that point it'll be painfully aware to everyone. It's not a case of a few screw-ups, it's a case where every time someone does something, you would have done the opposite yourself. You don't get to make their decisions but you do get to choose the decision-makers. And, if someone's doing everything wrong, just like a consistent thing over like a period of many weeks or a month, you'll be aware of it.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': "The last part on the team section is about firing people when it's not working. No matter what I say here is not going to prevent anyone from doing it wrong and the reason that I say that is that firing people is one of the worst parts of running a company. Actually in my own experience, I'd say it is the very worst part. Every first time founder waits too long, everyone hopes that an employee will turn around. But\xa0the right answer is to fire fast when it's not working.\xa0It's better for the company, it's also better for the employee. But it's so painful and so awful, that everyone gets it wrong the first few times.\n\nIn addition to firing people who are doing bad at their job, you also wanna fire people who are a) creating office politics, and b) who are\xa0persistently negative. The rest of the company is always aware of employees doing things like this, and it's just this huge drag - it's completely toxic to the company. Again, this is an example of something that might work OK in a big company, although I'm still skeptical, but will kill a startup. So that you need to watch out for people that are ifs.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': "One thing that founders forget is that after they hire employees, they have to retain them. I'm not going to go into full detail here because we're going to have a lecture on this later, but I do want to talk about it a little bit because founders get this wrong so often.\xa0You have to make sure your employees are happy and feel valued.\xa0This is one of the reasons that equity grants are so important. People in the excitement of joining a startup don't think about it much, but as they come in day after day, year after year, if they feel they have been treated unfairly that will really start to grate on them and resentment will build.\n\nBut more than that, learning just a little bit of management skills, which first-time CEOs are usually terrible at, goes a long way. One of the speakers at YC this summer, who is now extremely successful, struggled early on and had his team turn over a few times. Someone asked him what his biggest struggle was and he said, turns out\xa0you shouldn't tell your employees they're fucking up every day unless you want them all to leave because they will.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': "There is a famous test from Paul Graham called the animal test.\xa0The idea here is that you should be able to describe any employee as an animal at what they do.\xa0I don't think that translates out of English very well but you need unstoppable people.\xa0You want people that are just going to get it done. Founders who usually end up being very happy with their early hires usually end up describing these people as the very best in the world at what they do.\n\nMark Zuckerberg once said that he tries to hire people that A. he'd be comfortable hanging with socially and B. heād be comfortable reporting to if the roles were reversed. This strikes me as a very good framework.\xa0You don't have to be friends with everybody, but you should at least enjoy working with them. And if you don't have that, you should at least deeply respect them. But again, if you don't want to spend a lot of time around people you should trust your instincts about that.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': "Another thing that I have noticed from talking to YC companies is that good communication skills tend to correlate with hires that work out. I used to not pay attention to this. Weāre going to talk more about why communication is so important in an early startup. If someone is difficult to talk to, if someone cannot communicate clearly, it's a real problem in terms of their likelihood to work out.\xa0Also. for early employees you want someone that has somewhat of a risk-taking attitude.\xa0You generally get this, otherwise they wouldn't be interested in a startup, but now that startups are sort of more in fashion, you want people that actually sort of like a little bit of risk. If someone is choosing between joining McKinsey or your startup it's very unlikely they're going to work out at the startup.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': "There are three things I look for in a hire. Are they smart?\xa0Do they get things done?\xa0Do I want to spend a lot of time around them? And if I get an answer, if I can say yes to all three of these, I never regret it, it's almost always worked out. You can learn a lot about all three of these things in an interview but the very best way is working together, so ideally someone you've worked together with in the past and in that case you probably don't even need an interview. If you haven't, then I think it's way better to work with someone on a project for a day or two before hiring them. You'll both learn a lot they will too and most first-time founders are very bad interviewers but very good at evaluating someone after they've worked together.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': "Another question that founders ask us a lot about his experience and how much that matters. The short version here is that experience matters for some roles and not for others.\xa0When you're hiring someone that is going to run a large part of your organization experience probably matters a lot. For most of the early hires that you make at a startup, experience probably doesn't matter that much and you should go for aptitude and belief in what youāre doing. Most of the best hires that I've made in my entire life have never done that thing before. So it's really worth thinking, is this a role where I care about experience or not. And you'll often find to donāt, especially in the early days.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': "Sources of candidates. This is another thing that students get wrong a lot.\xa0The best source for hiring by far is people that you already know and people that other employees in the company already know.\xa0Most great companies in text have been built by personal referrals for the first hundred employees and often many more. Most founders feel awkward but calling anyone good that they've ever met and asking their employees to do the same. But she'll notice if you go to work at Facebook or Google one of the things they do in your first few weeks is an HR person sits you down and beat out of you every smart person youāve ever met to be able to recruit them.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': "If you compromise and hire someone mediocre you will always regret it.\xa0We like to warn founders of this but no one really feels it until they make the mistake the first time, but it can poison the culture. Mediocre people at huge companies will cause some problems, but it won't kill the company. A single mediocre hire within the first five will often in fact kill a startup.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': "On thing that founders always underestimate is how hard it is to recruit. You think you have this great idea and everyone's going to join. But that's not how it works. To get the very best people, they have a lot of great options and so it can easily take a year to recruit someone. It's this long process and so you have to convince them that\xa0your mission is the most important of anything that they're looking at.\xa0This is another case of why it's really important to get the product right before looking at anything else. The best people know that they should\xa0join a rocketship.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': "But by having an extremely high bar, by hiring slowly ensures that everyone believes in the mission, you can get that. So let's say, you listened to the warning about not hiring unless you absolutely have too. When you're in this hiring mode, it should be your number one priority to get the best people. Just like when you're in product mode that should be your number one priority. And when you're in fundraising mode, fundraising is your number one priority.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': "These hires really matter, these people are what go on to define your company, and so\xa0you need people that believe in it almost as much as you do.\xa0And it sounds like a crazy thing to ask, but he's gotten this culture of extremely dedicated people that come together when the company faces a crisis. And when the company faced a big crisis early on,\xa0everyone lived in the office,\xa0and they shipped product every day until the crisis was over. One of the remarkable observations about Airbnb is that if you talk to any of the first forty or so employees, they all feel like they were a\xa0part of the founding of the company.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': "Many of the best YC companies have had a phenomenally small number of employees for their first year, sometimes none besides the founders.\xa0They really try to stay small as long as they possibly can.\xa0At the beginning, you should only hire when you desperately need to. Later, you should learn to hire fast and scale up the company, but in the early days the goal should be not to hire. And one of the reasons this is so bad, is that the cost of getting an early hire wrong is really high. In fact, a lot of the companies that I've been very involved with, that have had a very bad early hire in the first three or so employees never recover, it just kills the company.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': "The second part of how to hire: try not to. One of the weird things you'll notice as you start a company, is that everyone will ask you how many employees you have.\xa0And this is the metric people use to judge how real your startup is and how cool you are.\xa0And if you say you have a high number of employees, they're really impressed. And if you say you have a low number of employees, then you sound like this little joke. But actually it sucks to have a lot of employees, and you should be proud of how few employees you have. Lots of employees ends up with things like a\xa0high burn rate, meaning you're losing a lot of money every month,\xa0complexity, slow decision making, the list goes on and it's nothing good.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': "In addition to relentlessly resourceful, you want a tough and a calm cofounder. There are obvious things like smart, but everyone knows you want a smart cofounder, they don't prioritize things like tough and calm enough, especially if you feel like you yourself aren't, you need a cofounder who is. If you aren't technical, and even if most of the people in this room feel like they are, you want a technical cofounder. There's this weird thing going on in startups right now where it's become popular to say,\xa0You know what, we don't need a technical cofounders, we're gonna hire people, we're just gonna be great managers.\n\nThat doesn't work too well in our experience.\xa0Software people should really be starting software companies.\xa0Media people should be starting media companies.\xa0In the YC experience, two or three cofounders seems to be about perfect. One, obviously not great, five, really bad. Four works sometimes, but two or three I think is the target.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': "So as you're thinking about cofounders and people that could be good, there's a question of what you're looking for right? At YC we have this public phrase, and it's\xa0relentlessly resourceful, and everyone's heard of it. And you definitely need relentlessly resourceful cofounders, but there's a more colorful example that we share at the YC kickoff. Paul Graham started using this and I've kept it going.\n\nSo, you're looking for cofounders that need to be unflappable, tough, they know what to do in every situation. They act quickly, they're decisive, they're creative, they're ready for anything, and it turns out that there's a model for this in pop culture. And it sounds very dumb, but it's at least very memorable and we've told every class of YC this for a long time and I think it helps them.\n\nAnd that model is James Bond.\xa0And again, this sounds crazy,\xa0but it will at least stick in your memory and you\xa0need someone that behaves like James Bond\xa0more than you need someone that is an expert in some particular domain.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': 'When hiring, look for people with the right attitude. Skills can be taught. Attitude changes require a brain transplant.', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': 'I think the single, most important fact about doing a startup is being clear about your vision and not letting it get distorted by what pundits and experts tell you. But the second most important thing is finding the right team. And thatās really, really hard, because people tend to look for people around them and so itās the person who they happen to know as opposed to the best possible person to find. You know, I was relentless. It took a lot of time. I used to say when I was starting my first company, I was much more of a glorified recruiter than a CEO, or a founder. I really spent probably well over 50% of my time recruiting, and I encourage all entrepreneurs to try and do that.', 'person': 'Vinod Khosla', 'source': 'https://venturehacks.com/khosla-recruiter'}, {'text': 'Hire people who hit two criteria. One is a high level of intensity and the other is a high degree of humility. Thatās a powerful combination. In a dynamic environment in which a small number of people are going to make a decision that affects the whole company, each person comes in with their own stubborn point of view and thereās a natural collision of ideas. When you have people who are both high intensity and high humility, I find that youāre more likely to create an environment that fosters an idea meritocracy, in which the best ideas win.', 'person': 'Will Ahmed', 'source': 'https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/lifestyle/article/will-ahmed-whoop-tips-for-success'}, {'text': 'there are 2 kinds of engineers - the kind that thinks about their job as solving a series of brain teasers - the kind that thinks about their job as building things big co folks skew towards the former because everything has already been built startup people skew to the latter', 'person': 'Alexandr Wang', 'source': 'https://twitter.com/alexandr_wang'}, {'text': "When he received a resumĆ© at 0230, 'he replied back in thirty minutes, addressing everything I put in there point by point. He said, āwhen you interview make sure you can talk concretely about what you do rather than use buzzwords.''", 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-SpaceX-Fantastic-Future/dp/006230125X'}, {'text': 'So the quality of hiring is the most important thing. I always say the team you build is the company you build, not the business plan you make. So some founders do this really, really well. Patrick Collison, college dropout, very, very young, inexperienced, built an incredible team. But Jack Dorsey did that at Square, both turned out great companies.', 'person': 'Vinod Khosla', 'source': 'https://www.thetwentyminutevc.com/vinodkhosla/'}, {'text': 'The single most important thing I spend time on, probably more than any other single thing in my calendar, is helping our companies recruit a great team.', 'person': 'Vinod Khosla', 'source': 'https://www.thetwentyminutevc.com/vinodkhosla/'}], 'people': ['Alexandr Wang', 'Brian Chesky', 'Doug Leone', 'Elon Musk', 'Eric Glyman', 'Keith Rabois', 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'Sam Altman', 'Vinod Khosla', 'Will Ahmed'], 'sources': ['https://articles.sequoiacap.com/2018-06-20-doug-leone', 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/', 'https://twitter.com/alexandr_wang', 'https://venturehacks.com/khosla-recruiter', 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-SpaceX-Fantastic-Future/dp/006230125X', 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281', 'https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/lifestyle/article/will-ahmed-whoop-tips-for-success', 'https://www.thetwentyminutevc.com/vinodkhosla/', 'https://www.youtube.com/@The-Art-of-Hiring/videos', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gYHSPKjMTM&t=2s', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXubBqd8uXs', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZcTLjMTVZ4', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrqo-dAQpfc']}
{'name': 'Improving diet š„', 'count': 5, 'people_count': 2, 'sources_count': 2, 'quotes': [{'text': 'But the thing that matters almost more than anything in determining whether Iāll have a happy, satisfying day is this: no matter what time you get up, start the day with a real, sit-down breakfast.', 'person': 'Marc Andreessen', 'source': 'https://pmarchive.com/guide_to_personal_productivity.html'}, {'text': 'I have one big shot of espresso immediately when I wake up and one after lunch. I assume this is about 200mg total of caffeine per day. I tried a few other configurations; this was the one that worked by far the best. I otherwise aggressively avoid stimulants, but I will have more coffee if Iām super tired and really need to get something done.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/productivity'}, {'text': 'Eating lots of sugar is the thing that makes me feel the worst and that I try hardest to avoid. I also try to avoid foods that aggravate my digestion or spike up inflammation (for example, very spicy foods). I donāt have much willpower when it comes to sweet things, so I mostly just try to keep junk food out of the house.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/productivity'}, {'text': 'I very rarely eat breakfast, so I get about 15 hours of fasting most days (except an espresso when I wake up). I know this is contrary to most advice, and I suspect itās not optimal for most people, but it definitely works well for me.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/productivity'}, {'text': 'Not eating a lot in the few hours before sleep helps. Not drinking alcohol helps a lot, though Iām not willing to do that all the time.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/productivity'}], 'people': ['Marc Andreessen', 'Sam Altman'], 'sources': ['https://blog.samaltman.com/productivity', 'https://pmarchive.com/guide_to_personal_productivity.html']}
{'name': 'Leading š¤“', 'count': 11, 'people_count': 7, 'sources_count': 7, 'quotes': [{'text': 'The leadership team is great at inspiring a vision for what is possible while also laying out the path to get there. They are also very conscientious about the fact that the process of building is itself just as important as what you are building, and give a lot of thought to how they are building, not just what they are building.', 'person': 'Jacob Peters', 'source': 'https://nextplayso.substack.com/p/spotlight-superpower'}, {'text': 'I quantify everything what a person does a team does a department does a company does', 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZcTLjMTVZ4'}, {'text': 'But then he added, āItās true that if they see the general out on the battlefield, the troops are going to be motivated. Wherever Napoleon was, thatās where his armies would do best. Even if I donāt do anything but show up, theyāll look at me and say that at least I wasnāt spending all night partying.ā\xa0', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': "Like, for example, the role of a great leader is to hire great people and empower them to do their job. And I'm not saying I disagree with that statement, but that statement, if you do that and you're not careful, your company will be destroyed. So let me tell you how that would happen. We had a company where we were like a matrix organization. And so like we had all these different teams. And by the way, there's no governor of how many teams there are. So teams can create teams, can create sub teams, can create sub teams that people can decide how many manager levels they create. Like if you're not careful people do this. And why do they do this? Because they want to have new teams. They want to have job responsibility, all these scopes. So let's take like a marketing or creative department.\xa0", 'person': 'Brian Chesky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/@The-Art-of-Hiring/videos'}, {'text': "Great leadership is presence, not absence. It is not good for you to hire great people and trust them to do their job. How do you know if they're doing a good job if you're not in the details?", 'person': 'Brian Chesky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/@The-Art-of-Hiring/videos'}, {'text': 'The role of a leader is to change the status quo, step up the pace, and increase the intensity. Leaders are the energy bunnies and pacemakers of the organization. Some people drain energy from organizations; not leaders, they engulf organizations with energy.', 'person': 'Frank Slootman', 'source': 'https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/amp-up-frank-slootman/'}, {'text': 'From the start, my prime directive, the fundamental goal, was the full and total implementation throughout the organization of the actions and attitudes of the Standard of Performance I described earlier.', 'person': 'Bill Walsh', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.fr/Score-Takes-Care-Itself-Philosophy/dp/1591843472'}, {'text': 'It is a conceptual blueprint for action; that is, a perception of what should be done, when it should be done, and why it should be done. Your philosophy is the single most important navigational point on your leadership compass.', 'person': 'Bill Walsh', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.fr/Score-Takes-Care-Itself-Philosophy/dp/1591843472'}, {'text': 'At its best, an organization - your team - bespeaks values and a way of doing things that emanate from a source; that source is you - the leader. ', 'person': 'Bill Walsh', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.fr/Score-Takes-Care-Itself-Philosophy/dp/1591843472'}, {'text': 'Never ask your troops to do something youāre not willing to do.', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': 'It should not be believed that a march of three or four days in the wrong direction can be corrected by a countermarch. As a rule, this is to make two mistakes instead of one.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}], 'people': ['Bill Walsh', 'Brian Chesky', 'Elon Musk', 'Frank Slootman', 'Jacob Peters', 'Napoleon', 'Nikolay Storonsky'], 'sources': ['https://nextplayso.substack.com/p/spotlight-superpower', 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281', 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230', 'https://www.amazon.fr/Score-Takes-Care-Itself-Philosophy/dp/1591843472', 'https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/amp-up-frank-slootman/', 'https://www.youtube.com/@The-Art-of-Hiring/videos', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZcTLjMTVZ4']}
{'name': 'Learning š', 'count': 64, 'people_count': 18, 'sources_count': 27, 'quotes': [{'text': 'If you want to think originally and differently, seek uncorrelated inputs. Read minor works, older things, obscure journals. ', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'The most valuable feedback usually hurts a lot.', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'Once in awhile, put away all concepts you read about online and reason āupā from the base of your experience and what youāve seen and done. (e.g. What were some of the best decisions you made? The worst? Why? Can you apply those lessons now? etc.)', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'Be honest about whether something is learning or entertainment. Real learning is extremely hard and effortful. (Podcasts, Atlantic articles, pop science books, anything thatās a bit too digestible is more āentertainmentā than real learning).', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'Ask dumb questions. The people who matter wonāt judge you for it, and youāll learn things as a result.', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'Synthesize things as you read. Just because youāve read something, doesnāt mean youāve understood it; your brain has to come up with its own encoding. Whatever understanding things is, itās related to compression. Which implies that you want to read and then restate in your own words, so that your mind is forced to compress the thing. Ideally several times, in varying ways.\n\nOnce youāve done this, you are much more likely to retain the thing, and to actually grasp it; and if youāre struggling with this exercise, then you donāt understand the thing and should go back and look at it again. (This is also a useful bullshit filter -- try and restate someoneās claim in a different way, and see if it still holds up).\n\nWhen I say ārestate it in several different waysā, one useful way would be drawing it. Just draw a schematic representation of what you think is being said. Another would be to state it as though youāre writing an article for simple words Wikipedia. ', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/advice'}, {'text': 'Write regularly, and learn to āthink in writingā. This is true for literally everyone, regardless of whether you want to be a writer or not, whether you want to publish or not. Just have a Google Doc in which you add a page a day of whateverās on your mind. This has a million benefits, but a simple one is just clearing your cache: if you donāt do this, your brain sort of gets clogged by all the things you have on your mind, whereas if you āemptyā your brain onto a page that creates room for new thoughts.', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/advice'}, {'text': 'I remember reading "Principles" by Ray Dalio over 10 years ago when it was just a 50-page PDF. I loved it because it was direct and unpolished. Five years later, he published a 400-page book that was highly polished. I don\'t recommend reading the book version as it\'s much worse compared to the original PDF.', 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZcTLjMTVZ4'}, {'text': "It's more due to my education. I studied physics and math, which taught me to model life. I always model various aspects of life in a quantitative way, including how the company should operate, how individuals should perform, and how to make investments.", 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZcTLjMTVZ4'}, {'text': 'They all have a growth mindset, theyāre all eager to listen...almost all of them [are] an absolute sponge.', 'person': 'Roelof Botha', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQAZ3iV3gSg&list=TLGGp__Zzi2H69UzMTEwMjAyNA'}, {'text': '...take the time to learn. There is so much valuable information you can get from your classroom.', 'person': 'Roelof Botha', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQAZ3iV3gSg&list=TLGGp__Zzi2H69UzMTEwMjAyNA'}, {'text': 'āI try to criticize the action, not the person. We all make mistakes. What matters is whether a person has a good feedback loop, can seek criticism from others, and can improve. Physics does not care about hurt feelings. It caresabout whether you got the rocket right.ā', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': "I think you have to be curious about what is required to run a good company at that stage and what's required to run Stripe well really matters. And one thing we try to do, is just spend a lot of time looking at all the other companies and what they've done. Not that you want to blindly emulate them, but you should at least understand. It's funny, I remember Tyler Cowen commenting about Magnus Carlsen that he entered some chess trivia contest that was just like literally like chess trivia and won it. He knew the most chess trivia out of anyone who was in this contest. And that's not a coincidence, I think, that the world's #1 player has also studied the most about all the chess history, extremely knowledgeable on that. I don't know if we'd win the business trivia, but I think we just have a respectable showing because youād have to understand what makes Apple versus Amazon.", 'person': 'Patrick Collison', 'source': 'https://www.joincolossus.com/episodes/85748309/collison-a-business-state-of-mind'}, {'text': 'the most valuable skill in the world is systems engineering: the ability to debug, understand, and improve a complex system with limited/poor measurement. THIS is what makes great scientists, engineers, PMs, operators, doctors & investors. not truly taught in school outside STEM', 'person': 'Alexandr Wang', 'source': 'https://twitter.com/alexandr_wang/status/1693313972848759290?s=20'}, {'text': 'one of the biggest lies of psychology is that introversion vs extroversion are innate traits extroversion can be learnedāgiven a sufficient number of positive social interactions, you can become an extrovert and introverts who become extroverts are generally unstoppable ;)', 'person': 'Alexandr Wang', 'source': 'https://twitter.com/alexandr_wang/status/1689644164978556929?s=20'}, {'text': "weird phenomenonā when you're young, you say what you thinkāyou don't know any better! then as you get older, you start to say not what you think, but what others want you to say. eventually, you learn that true power IS saying exactly what you think, and revert to childhood.", 'person': 'Alexandr Wang', 'source': 'https://twitter.com/alexandr_wang/status/1687489004793638913?s=20'}, {'text': 'the most valuable skill in the world is systems engineering: the ability to debug, understand, and improve a complex system with limited/poor measurement THIS is what makes great scientists, engineers, PMs, operators, doctors & investors not truly taught in school outside STEM', 'person': 'Alexandr Wang', 'source': 'https://twitter.com/alexandr_wang/status/1693313972848759290?s=20'}, {'text': 'Bill Gates began an annual tradition called the Think Week. He would seclude himself and spend an entire week dedicated to reading, learning, and thinking. The Think *Day* is my adaptation: Pick one day each month (or quarter) to step back from all of your day-to-day professional demands. The goal is to spend the entire day reading, learning, journaling, and THINKING. Six thinking question prompts I have found useful (that you should steal!): 1. What are your strongest beliefs? What would it take for you to change your mind on them? 2. What are a few things that you know now that you wish you knew 5 years ago? 3. How can you do less, but better? 4. Are you hunting antelope (big important problems) or field mice (small urgent problems)? 5. What actions were you engaged in 5 years ago that you cringe at today? What actions are you engaged in today that you will cringe at in 5 years? 6. What would your 80-year-old self say about your decisions today? The Think Day changed my life. Give it a shot and let me know what you think.', 'person': 'Sahil Bloom', 'source': 'https://twitter.com/SahilBloom/status/1681306307712921603?s=20'}, {'text': "[Think Weeks are] CPU time. It's time that you get to think about things... When you write down these things to think about, that's like the code, you know, when will low interest rates end? Why sin't the clinic working better? Okay, the private sector is good at this, do they have capacity? How many cities is this going to get into? Have we done the safety tests? Have we really underestimated this? What is in human sewage? Then you think, okay, do I need to read some books about that? Who do I need to talk about that? And, some things I just say to myself I need to think.", 'person': 'Bill Gates', 'source': 'https://www.netflix.com/title/80184771'}, {'text': 'Bill started to take Think Weeks back in the 90s when he was still running Microsoft. He would travel the Hood Canal and spend one week there alone, reading and thinking. He would absorb stacks of books and technical paper, anything that could help him undrstand the future.', 'person': 'Bill Gates', 'source': 'https://www.netflix.com/title/80184771'}, {'text': "If you want to think new thoughts that are different, then do what a lot of creative people do - get the problem reasonably clear and then refuse to look at any answers until you've thought the problem through carefully how you would do it, how you could slightly change the problem to be the correct one. So yes, you need to keep up. You need to keep up more to find out what the problems are than to read to find the solutions. The reading is necessary to know what is going on and what is possible. But reading to get the solutions does not seem to be the way to do great research. So I'll give you two answers. You read; but it is not the amount, it is the way you read that counts.", 'person': 'Richard Hamming', 'source': 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html'}, {'text': "Another trait, it took me a while to notice. I noticed the following facts about people who work with the door open or the door closed. I notice that if you have the door to your office closed, you get more work done today and tomorrow, and you are more productive than most. But 10 years later somehow you don't know quite know what problems are worth working on; all the hard work you do is sort of tangential in importance. He who works with the door open gets all kinds of interruptions, but he also occasionally gets clues as to what the world is and what might be important. Now I cannot prove the cause and effect sequence because you might say, ``The closed door is symbolic of a closed mind.'' I don't know. But I can say there is a pretty good correlation between those who work with the doors open and those who ultimately do important things, although people who work with doors closed often work harder. Somehow they seem to work on slightly the wrong thing - not much, but enough that they miss fame.", 'person': 'Richard Hamming', 'source': 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html'}, {'text': "If you believe too much you'll never notice the flaws; if you doubt too much you won't get started. It requires a lovely balance.", 'person': 'Richard Hamming', 'source': 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html'}, {'text': '- read and code CONSTANTLY. everything is changing so quicklyāthe tinkerers and voracious learners will win', 'person': 'Alexandr Wang', 'source': 'https://twitter.com/alexandr_wang/status/1637638523066150912?s=20'}, {'text': "A few books I recommend: 'Train Your Mind, Change Your Brain' ā Itās about neuroplasticity, and the role of the Dalai Lama and the Buddhist community in helping us understand our mind. 'Spark' - this outlines the science we understand behind the impact of our physical health on our cognitive abilities.", 'person': 'Yohei Nakajima', 'source': 'https://every.to/chain-of-thought/this-vc-is-slowly-automating-their-job'}, {'text': "'Crystal Nights' by Greg Egan, 'The Last Question' by Isaac Asimov, and 'The Gentle Seduction' by Marc Stiegler. Theyāre all about the development of a super powerful A.I. in very different ways. Actually, if I can recommend a bonus fourth one. This is a blog post, not a short story, but it really touches on a lot of this societal governance power issues weāre talking about relative to A.I. 'Meditations on Moloch.' Itās a blog post on Slate Star Codex. I strongly recommend that one.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/11/podcasts/transcript-ezra-klein-interviews-sam-altman.html'}, {'text': 'āWeāre all hanging out in this cabanaā¦ & Elon is there reading some obscure Soviet rocket manual that was all moldy & looked like it had been bought on eBayā¦ He was studying it & talking openly about space travel & changing the world.ā', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-SpaceX-Fantastic-Future/dp/006230125X'}, {'text': "After he sold PayPal, he started donating money to an organization called the Mars Society and hanging out there seeing what the plans were. He thought NASA and some other people would basically be trying to go to Mars. And when he looked it up, he was shocked that they weren't. So he was trying to influence this as much as he could.", 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-SpaceX-Fantastic-Future/dp/006230125X'}, {'text': 'When I highlight something from a book that contains an idea, concept, metaphor, or generally something more abstract, Iāll put it into my\xa0Zettelkasten\xa0instead of my flashcard system. These highlights arenāt to be remembered, they are to be connected.\xa0\nZettelkasten is German for āslip boxā and is a method to manage knowledge. Basically, you take ideas from books, articles or conversations and write those ideas on note cards, collect them in a central database, and link them together so that you can start to find larger relationships between concepts youāre learning.', 'person': 'Simon Eskildsen', 'source': 'https://every.to/superorganizers/how-to-build-a-learning-machine-299655'}, {'text': 'When I come across something in a book that seems useful to understand and\xa0remember, I will highlight it on my Kindle and add a note to it with the text:\xa0ā.flashā.\xa0All notes with ā.flashā in them are then automatically loaded into Readwise and organized under a āflashā tag. Iāll then periodically open the list of āflashā tags in Readwise, and then translate them into flashcard form in\xa0Anki.\xa0Anki helps me remember things by surfacing flashcards that Iām likely to forget\xa0just\xa0before Iād otherwise forget them. Itās called\xa0spaced repetition.', 'person': 'Simon Eskildsen', 'source': 'https://every.to/superorganizers/how-to-build-a-learning-machine-299655'}, {'text': 'Anything that I find thatās important, Iāll highlight on my Kindle. All of those highlights automatically go to my\xa0Readwise\xa0where I can add them to my learning system. Readwise is fantastic because it automatically scrapes all of my Kindle highlights and puts them into one place for me where I can search, tag, and review them.', 'person': 'Simon Eskildsen', 'source': 'https://every.to/superorganizers/how-to-build-a-learning-machine-299655'}, {'text': 'I pick books by browsing Amazon and sending samples to my Kindle. Then I check out the samples to decide what I want to actually read cover to cover. I learned this from\xa0my friend Dan Doyon.', 'person': 'Simon Eskildsen', 'source': 'https://every.to/superorganizers/how-to-build-a-learning-machine-299655'}, {'text': 'The one thing I do try to follow is to go on streaks of reading a lot of books on a particular topic around the same time. Doing this is useful because it means I donāt have to just trust one authorās perspective on a particular topic ā and helps me connect a lot of facts together, so I can understand things better.', 'person': 'Simon Eskildsen', 'source': 'https://every.to/superorganizers/how-to-build-a-learning-machine-299655'}, {'text': 'As I started to read more, the question was whether to go deep or wide. I am curious about so many things, so I naturally gravitated to read widely. I strive to be T-shaped:\xa0really\xa0good at something, but with a wide foundation ā\xa0and thatās a metaphor we use widely at Shopify.', 'person': 'Simon Eskildsen', 'source': 'https://every.to/superorganizers/how-to-build-a-learning-machine-299655'}, {'text': 'When I started managing, I felt a strong obligation to be the best\xa0lead\xa0I could for the team.\xa0Managing\xa0is a big responsibility ā and itās especially challenging when some of your reports are 10 years older than you. It seemed to me that the best way to meet this responsibility was to wake up earlier and read something every day before I came in.', 'person': 'Simon Eskildsen', 'source': 'https://every.to/superorganizers/how-to-build-a-learning-machine-299655'}, {'text': 'Reid recommends studying Ludwig Wittgenstein, about whom heās taught a course at Oxford. āOne of the bedrocks of modern analytic philosophy is to think of [language] . . . if youāre trying to talk to someone else about some problem, and youāre trying to make progress, how do you make language as positive an instrument as possible? What are the ways that language can work, and what are the ways that language doesnāt work?ā', 'person': 'Reid Hoffman', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Tools-Titans-Billionaires-World-Class-Performers/dp/1328683788'}, {'text': "Copying is a good way to learn, but copy the right things. When I was in college I imitated the pompous diction of famous professors. But this wasn't what made them eminent ā it was more a flaw their eminence had allowed them to sink into. Imitating it was like pretending to have gout in order to seem rich.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/marginal.html'}, {'text': "Working on small things is also a good way to learn. The most important kinds of learning happen one project at a time. ('Next time, I won't...') The faster you cycle through projects, the faster you'll evolve.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/marginal.html'}, {'text': "The Achilles heel of successful companies is their inability to cannibalize themselves. Many innovations consist of replacing something with a cheaper alternative, and companies just don't want to see a path whose immediate effect is to cut an existing source of revenue.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/marginal.html'}, {'text': 'My all time favorite is Lying by Sam Harris. ', 'person': 'Vinod Khosla', 'source': 'https://www.thetwentyminutevc.com/vinodkhosla/'}, {'text': 'Loonshots, about the culture of Silicon Valley. ', 'person': 'Vinod Khosla', 'source': 'https://www.thetwentyminutevc.com/vinodkhosla/'}, {'text': 'Uninhabited Earth, about the climate crisis, something Iāve been passionate about for a long time. ', 'person': 'Vinod Khosla', 'source': 'https://www.thetwentyminutevc.com/vinodkhosla/'}, {'text': 'My favorite economics book is Third Pillar, which is about the need for community in capitalism, and how politics, capitalists and community need to play together.', 'person': 'Vinod Khosla', 'source': 'https://www.thetwentyminutevc.com/vinodkhosla/'}, {'text': 'My favorite technical book is Life On the Edge, which is about quantum biology.', 'person': 'Vinod Khosla', 'source': 'https://www.thetwentyminutevc.com/vinodkhosla/'}, {'text': 'Whatās really useful to a founder if you have a good board, is focus on the two or three questions that you most need feedback on. In private company boards, I donāt think the role of a board is as much fiduciary as it is in public companies, itās much more advisory. So ask the board the questions youāre most struggling with, the questions where youāre most uncertain, where you want a different point of view.', 'person': 'Vinod Khosla', 'source': 'https://www.thetwentyminutevc.com/vinodkhosla/'}, {'text': 'Well, I always say my willingness to fail is what has allowed me to succeed. And not being embarrassed about large failures Iāve had, has given me the courage to keep going.', 'person': 'Vinod Khosla', 'source': 'https://www.thetwentyminutevc.com/vinodkhosla/'}, {'text': 'Find vivid examples of success in the domains you care about. If you want to become a great scientist, try to find ways to spend time with good (or, ideally, great) scientists in person. Watch YouTube videos of interviews. Follow some on Twitter.', 'person': 'Patrick Collison', 'source': 'https://patrickcollison.com/advice'}, {'text': 'Aim to read a lot.', 'person': 'Patrick Collison', 'source': 'https://patrickcollison.com/advice'}, {'text': "In particular, try to go deep on multiple things. (To varying degrees, I tried to go deep on languages, programming, writing, physics, math. Some of those stuck more than others.) One of the main things you should try to achieve by age 20 is some sense for which kinds of things you enjoy doing. This probably won't change a lot throughout your life and so you should try to discover the shape of that space as quickly as you can.", 'person': 'Patrick Collison', 'source': 'https://patrickcollison.com/advice'}, {'text': '[On reading] Iām trying to strip out all the stuff in the middle. What Iāve discovered is the number of people who can write something in the middle zone ā when theyāre trying to explain something that happened last week, month, a year or even a decade ā and who I trust to actually give me an objective read on the situation is just a really, really short list. Thereās a handful but there arenāt very many. We have one situation currently ā whatās literally happening right now [with COVID-19]. Coronavirus is one where everyday Iām looking at all the science and all the economics because these are critical issues. And Iām trying to avoid all the commentary and all of the interpretation. And then the other, as you said, thereās just a very large amount of timeless stuff that really has been proven right over time. You could spend your entire life only reading timeless works which is what smart people used to do.', 'person': 'Marc Andreessen', 'source': 'https://a16z.com/marc-andreessen-on-productivity-scheduling-reading-habits-work-and-more/'}, {'text': 'Really valuable to keep a personal document - so not one that lives on your work servers - as you traverse your career you are going to learn what gives you energy and what takes it away. And you are going to learn what youāre naturally good at - things you donāt even realise youāre good at because itās like breathing. And the things that you really struggle with. If you are going to build self-awareness but also figure out āwhatās my place in life career-wise where I have skills, impact and it gives me energy?ā Youāre privileged if you get to choose that kind of career. If you donāt build that self-awarenessā¦ Write in this document every six months. It is not a journal. It is like a āokay for the last six months I was doing this job and here is what I was good at and here is what I was not good at and hereās what I really liked about it and hereās what I did not like about itā. And if you start to watch your patterns you start to figure out what you are and what you do and what you need to work on. And it is just going to be a guide. Itās never about titles to me. Itās more about what is the actual action that you are doing and how do you feel and are you good at it. And getting better at honing in on that so you can hone in on what your calling is. So thatās some advice. Write it down though. Do not just keep it in your head. Because you will surprise yourself when you see patterns repeat if you write it down. ', 'person': 'Claire Hughes-Johnson', 'source': 'https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/techsetters/episodes/Claire-Hughes-Johnson--Increasing-the-GDP-of-the-Internet-e10qpp1'}, {'text': 'Yet no matter what you say to him, no matter what he learns, he will profit little from it if in his innermost heart he lacks that sacred flame, that love of the good which alone inspires great deeds.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'Historical factā¦ cannot be ascertained when events actually occur, in the heat of contrary passions; and if, later on, there is a consensus, this is only because there is no one left to contradict. But if this is so, what is this historical truth in nearly every case? An agreed-upon fiction, as has been most ingeniously said.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'History I conquered rather than studied: that is to say, I wanted from it and retained of it only what could add to my ideas, I spurned what was of no use, and I seized upon certain conclusions that pleased me.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'Finally, use your time to learn what you do not know - cavalry, infantry and artillery tactics and the administration of justice and of finance.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'Nations and individuals alike learn only from their own experience - and, most of the time, from misfortunes. ', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'The true wisdom of the nations is experience. ', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'What is a theory? Mere nonsense, if you want to apply it to human masses. ', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'It is dangerous to give too extensive a knowledge of mathematics to people who are not rich.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'The most important thing about evaluating someone is their rate of improvement.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://conversationswithtyler.com/episodes/sam-altman/'}, {'text': 'Learn, voraciously.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/the-days-are-long-but-the-decades-are-short'}, {'text': 'Itās important to learn that you can learn anything you want, and that you can get better quickly.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/productivity'}, {'text': 'āThe Mind of Napoleonā. The thing that stuck with me the most\u200aā\u200aand this is a trait we see among many of our good founders\u200aā\u200awas not his operational excellence. It was not his vision. It was not any of the things that he is well known for, that are all necessary if you want to do what he did in such a short period of time. But it was his incredible understanding of human psychologyā¦ It was really just about equality, but it was tied up with this weird French ideal of status and differentiation as well. So he talked about how you build a system\u200aā\u200agiven that people say this one thing but feel this other\u200aā\u200ahow you build a system where you can control the people.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://conversationswithtyler.com/episodes/sam-altman/'}, {'text': "Short stories? āCrystal Nightsā by Greg Egan, āThe Last Questionā by Isaac Asimov, and 'The Gentle Seduction' by Marc Stiegler. Theyāre all about the development of a super powerful A.I. in very different ways. Actually, if I can recommend a bonus fourth one. This is a blog post, not a short story, but it really touches on a lot of this societal governance power issues weāre talking about relative to A.I. āMeditations on Moloch.ā Itās a blog post on Slate Star Codex. I strongly recommend that one.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/11/podcasts/transcript-ezra-klein-interviews-sam-altman.html'}], 'people': ['Alexandr Wang', 'Bill Gates', 'Claire Hughes-Johnson', 'Elon Musk', 'Marc Andreessen', 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'Napoleon', 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'Patrick Collison', 'Paul Graham', 'Reid Hoffman', 'Richard Hamming', 'Roelof Botha', 'Sahil Bloom', 'Sam Altman', 'Simon Eskildsen', 'Vinod Khosla', 'Yohei Nakajima'], 'sources': ['http://www.paulgraham.com/marginal.html', 'https://a16z.com/marc-andreessen-on-productivity-scheduling-reading-habits-work-and-more/', 'https://blog.samaltman.com/productivity', 'https://blog.samaltman.com/the-days-are-long-but-the-decades-are-short', 'https://conversationswithtyler.com/episodes/sam-altman/', 'https://every.to/chain-of-thought/this-vc-is-slowly-automating-their-job', 'https://every.to/superorganizers/how-to-build-a-learning-machine-299655', 'https://nabeelqu.co/advice', 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles', 'https://patrickcollison.com/advice', 'https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/techsetters/episodes/Claire-Hughes-Johnson--Increasing-the-GDP-of-the-Internet-e10qpp1', 'https://twitter.com/SahilBloom/status/1681306307712921603?s=20', 'https://twitter.com/alexandr_wang/status/1637638523066150912?s=20', 'https://twitter.com/alexandr_wang/status/1687489004793638913?s=20', 'https://twitter.com/alexandr_wang/status/1689644164978556929?s=20', 'https://twitter.com/alexandr_wang/status/1693313972848759290?s=20', 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-SpaceX-Fantastic-Future/dp/006230125X', 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281', 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230', 'https://www.amazon.com/Tools-Titans-Billionaires-World-Class-Performers/dp/1328683788', 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html', 'https://www.joincolossus.com/episodes/85748309/collison-a-business-state-of-mind', 'https://www.netflix.com/title/80184771', 'https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/11/podcasts/transcript-ezra-klein-interviews-sam-altman.html', 'https://www.thetwentyminutevc.com/vinodkhosla/', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZcTLjMTVZ4', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQAZ3iV3gSg&list=TLGGp__Zzi2H69UzMTEwMjAyNA']}
{'name': 'Luck āļø', 'count': 2, 'people_count': 2, 'sources_count': 2, 'quotes': [{'text': 'Luck isnāt a constant, it increases with surface area: be in the right places, have lots of conversations, put yourself out there, ask for what you want and be optimistic and positive.', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': "It isn't that you only do a little great work at this circumstance and that was luck, there are many opportunities sooner or later. There are a whole pail full of opportunities, of which, if you're in this situation, you seize one and you're great over there instead of over here. There is an element of luck, yes and no. Luck favors a prepared mind; luck favors a prepared person. It is not guaranteed; I don't guarantee success as being absolutely certain. I'd say luck changes the odds, but there is some definite control on the part of the individual.", 'person': 'Richard Hamming', 'source': 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html'}], 'people': ['Nabeel S Quereshi', 'Richard Hamming'], 'sources': ['https://nabeelqu.co/principles', 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html']}
{'name': 'Making lists š', 'count': 7, 'people_count': 5, 'sources_count': 4, 'quotes': [{'text': "I use TODOIST.com as my todo application manager and have the following routine: Every morning, I check the list of tasks of the day and rank them by priority and how I want to do them: the first task on top, the second task after. I check my meetings of the day to see if it fits the need. I have always in my calendar time that is blocked for my work ('no meeting'). Every evening, I check what I have finished or not from the day, and I either re-allocate to another day the tasks I have not done, either change ownership of them or cancel them. Every Tuesday evening, I check: My TODO for the next 7 days and I re-organize it. Here are some questions I ask myself: 'Do I really want to do that this week?', 'Should I postpone it to another week?', 'Am I the right owner?', 'How many tasks per day?'. I also keep some room for new issues I might contribute to (starting on Thursday, a bit more on Friday, ā¦). My calendar for the next 7 days. My OKRs to I check if I am not missing something. From that, I prepare my next week priorities in my GDoc.", 'person': 'Jean-Charles Samuelian', 'source': 'https://alan.com/en/blog/discover-alan/a/self-organization-guide'}, {'text': 'What you do is this: every time you do somethingāanythingāuseful during the day, write it down in your Anti-Todo List on the card. Each time you do something, you get to write it down and you get that little rush of endorphins that the mouse gets every time he presses the button in his cage and gets a food pellet. And then at the end of the day, before you prepare tomorrowās 3x5 card, take a look at todayās card and its Anti-Todo list and marvel at all the things you actually got done that day.', 'person': 'Marc Andreessen', 'source': 'https://pmarchive.com/guide_to_personal_productivity.html'}, {'text': 'Each night before you go to bed, prepare a 3x5 index card with a short list of 3 to 5 things that you will do the next day.\nAnd then, the next day, do those things. I sit down at my desk before I go to sleep, pull up my Todo List (which I keep in Microsoft Wordās outline mode, due to long habit), and pick out the 3 to 5 things I am going to get done tomorrow. I write those things on a fresh 3x5 card, lay the card out with my card keys, and go to bed. Then, the next day, I try like hell to get just those things done. If I do, it was a successful day.', 'person': 'Marc Andreessen', 'source': 'https://pmarchive.com/guide_to_personal_productivity.html'}, {'text': 'Keep three and only three lists: a Todo List, a Watch List, and a Later List... Into the Todo List goes all the stuff you āmustā doācommitments, obligations, things that have to be done. A single list, possibly subcategorized by timeframe (today, this week, next week, next month). Into the Watch List goes all the stuff going on in your life that you have to follow up on, wait for someone else to get back to you on, remind yourself of in the future, or otherwise remember. Into the Later List goes everything elseāeverything you might want to do or will do when you have time or wish you could do. If it doesnāt go on one of those three lists, it goes away.', 'person': 'Marc Andreessen', 'source': 'https://pmarchive.com/guide_to_personal_productivity.html'}, {'text': 'A to-do tool where it is very simple to add and move items. I use a well-organised TODOIST because having a list of notifications is overwhelming. I use the TODOIST + Alfred integration for my To-Do. I find it really amazing.', 'person': 'Jean Charles Samuelian', 'source': 'https://alan.com/en/blog/discover-alan/a/self-organization-guide'}, {'text': 'It was a whimsical economy of the same kind which dictated [Napoleonās] practice, when general in Italy, in regard to his burdensome correspondence. He directed Bourrienne to leave all letters unopened for three weeks, and then observed with satisfaction how large a part of the correspondence had thus disposed of itself and no longer required an answer.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'My system has three key pillars: āMake sure to get the important shit doneā, āDonāt waste time on stupid shitā, and āmake a lot of lists.ā', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/productivity'}], 'people': ['Jean Charles Samuelian', 'Jean-Charles Samuelian', 'Marc Andreessen', 'Napoleon', 'Sam Altman'], 'sources': ['https://alan.com/en/blog/discover-alan/a/self-organization-guide', 'https://blog.samaltman.com/productivity', 'https://pmarchive.com/guide_to_personal_productivity.html', 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230']}
{'name': 'Management š¼', 'count': 51, 'people_count': 6, 'sources_count': 8, 'quotes': [{'text': "Peter [Thiel] would enforce this pretty strictly. He would say, I will not talk to you about anything else besides than this one thing I assigned you. I don't want to hear about how great you are doing over here, just shut up, and Peter would run away. And then focus until you conquer this one problem. And the insight behind this is that most people will solve problems that they understand how to solve. Roughly speaking, they will solve B+ problems instead of A+ problems. A+ problems are high impact problems for your company but they are difficult. You don't wake up in the morning with a solution, so you tend to procrastinate them. So imagine you wake up in the morning and create a list of things to do today, there's usually the A+ one on the top of the list, but you never get around to it. And so you solve the second and third. Then you have a company of over a hundred people so it cascades. You have a company that is always solving B+ things which does mean you grow, which does mean you add value, but you never really create that breakthrough idea. No one is spending 100% of their time banging their head against the wall every day until they solve it. So I highly recommend some version of that. You can be less stringent, you can give people three things to work on, but I would still track the concept of what would happen if you only gave everybody one thing to prioritize.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': "So I am going to argue that you need to spend a lot of time focusing on people. This is something I learned from Peter Thiel actually. He used to insist at PayPal that every single person could only do exactly one thing. And we all rebelled, every single person in the company rebelled to this idea. Because it's so unnatural, it's so different than other companies where people wanted to do multiple things, especially as you get more senior, you definitely want to do more things and you feel insulted to be asked to do just one thing.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': "And that's actually what you want to do with every since employee, every single day, is expand the scope of responsibilities until it breaks. And it will break, everybody, I couldn't run the world, everybody has some level of complexity that they can handle. And what you want to do is keep expanding it until you see where it breaks and that's the role they should stay in. That level of sophistication. But some people will surprise you. There will be some people that you do not expect. With different backgrounds, without a lot of experience that can just handle enormously complicated tasks. So keep testing that and pushing the envelope.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': "So what I basically believe is where there is low consequence and you have very low confidence in your own opinion, you should absolutely delegate. And delegate completely, let people make mistakes and learn. On the other side, obviously where the consequences are dramatic and you have extremely high conviction that you are right, you actually can't let your junior colleague make a mistake. You're ultimately responsible for that mistake and it's really important. You just can't allow that to happen. Now the best way to do that is to actually explain your thinking why. It's easy to shortcut when you get busy explaining ways in the world but it's very important to try.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': "Delegating vs doing it yourself. You don't want to do it yourself too often. So I basically borrowed from Peter, this is my first two by two matrix ever in my life, but he taught me something at least. You basically sort your own level of conviction about a decision on a grate, extremely high or extremely low. There's times when you know something is a mistake and there's times when you wouldn't really do it that way but you have no idea whether it's the right or wrong answer. And then there is a consequence dimension. There are things that if you make the wrong decision are very catastrophic to your company and you will fail. There are things that are pretty low impact. At the end of the day they aren't really going to make a big difference, at least initially.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': "So it's actually a good thing if you do reference checks on somebody and half the people you call say they are a micromanager and the other half say they actually give me a lot of responsibility. That's a feature not a bug. I didn't understand that at first at all. I used to be befuddled when people would do reference checks on me and come back with this complicated mosaic. Then I finally figured out that maybe I was doing my job correctly. So then I taught others that this is the way to do it.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': "[On delegation] First, and this actually came from High Output Management and Andy Grove, is called task relevant maturity. It's a fancy phrase for, has this person ever done this before? It's really simple, how mature is this person in doing something? And the more they have done the exact same task before, the more rope you are going to give them. And the more they are trying something new, the more you are going to instruct them and constantly monitor. This is a basic concept but it's worth keeping in the back of your brain. The interesting implication, and this is pretty radical, is that any executive, any CEO, should not have one management style. Your management style should be dictated by your employee. So with one particular person, you may be very much a micromanager because they are quite low on this scale. And with another person,, you may be delegating a lot because they are quite mature on this scale.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': "Next complicated topic is delegating. So just like the other metaphor on editing is writers do most of the work in the world, editors are not writing most of the content in any publication. So that is true of your company, you shouldn't be doing most of the work. And the way you get out of most of the work, is you delegate. Now the problem with delegating is that you are actually responsible for everything. The CEO, founder, there is no excuse. There is no, there is that department over there, this person over there screwed up. You are always responsible for every single thing, especially when things go wrong.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': "The people who work with you, generally, should be coming up with their own initiatives. So a reporter, generally, who covers Google will come up with the interesting stories that they are hearing in ether and propose one or two to their editor for approval. But it's not the editor saying, go cover Google and this is the angle I want. Once in a while they do that, but its not the meat and potatoes of what a journalist does every day. Your goal over time is to use less red ink every day. So one way of measuring how well you are doing at communicating or talking to your colleagues about what's important and what's not, about why some things are important and why some things are not. It's how much red ink you are pulling out in a day, it's okay if you are having a bad day and the red ink is all over the place. But it's not okay if the red ink next month is more than it was last month, and next quarter more than this, so measure yourself by how much red ink youāre creating.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': "Now the next thing you do is you allocate resources. So the editor construct, this is what editors do all the time. They take editors from the Mideast, covering the Mideast and they move them to Silicon Valley, because Silicon Valley is more interesting. Or they move them to the sports section because they want to compete on the basis of sports journals and other publications. So that can be top down, where I take a whole bunch of resources and people and say, we are now going over here. We are going to compete on this basis. Then next month, next quarter, next year well that Middle East coverage is getting boring, we don't want to do that anymore. Let's go chase after something else. Or it can be bottom up, just like journalists mostly come up with their own stories.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': "[On asking clarifying questions] We try to narrow down to, what are the one two three four things that matter most to this company? And only focus on those things. So it allows us to be more decisive and we can make decisions rapidly. It allows us not to distract you from your day job which is actually building a company. And yet still I think we get to the highest fidelity question because we don't have all these extra extraneous details and data. Now it's hard, it's something you have to practice. But when you get good at it, every step you eliminate, Andy Grove estimated you can improve performance by 30-50%.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': "Second thing editors do, is they ask you clarifying questions. When you present a paper to someone, what do they usually do? They find some ambiguity somewhere and ask, do you really mean this? Did you really mean that? Give me an example of this? That's what your job is. So you are in a meeting, people are going to look to you. And the real thing you do, is you ask a lot of questions. And they can be simple basic questions like should we try this seven days a week? Or six days? They can be fundamental questions like, whereās our competitive advantage here? We try to do this as investors too.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': "Don't accept the excuse of complexity. A lot of people will tell you, this is too challenging, this is too complicated, yeah well I know other people simplify but that's not for me, this is a complicated business. Theyāre wrong. You can change the world in 140 characters. You can build the most important companies in history with a very simple to describe concept. You can market products in less than 50 characters. There is no reason why you can't build your company the same way. So force yourself to simply every initiative, every product, every marketing, everything you do. Basically take out that red and start eliminating stuff.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': "The first thing an editor does and you have all probably had this experience in school, is you submit a paper, to a TA, a draft to your friend, and the first thing that editor does is they take out a red pen, or nowadays you go online, and they start striking things. Basically eliminating things, the biggest task of an editor is to simplify, simplify, simplify and that usually means omitting things. So that's your job too, is to clarify and simplify for everybody on your team. The more you simplify, the better people will perform. People can not understand and keep track of a long complicated set of initiatives. So you have to distill it down to one, two, or three things and use a framework they can repeat, they can repeat without thinking about, they can repeat to their friends, they can repeat at night.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': "So one of the most important things I learned at Square is the concept of editing. And this is the best metaphor I have ever seen in 14 years of running stuff, of how to think about your job. It's a natural metaphor, so it's easy to take with you everyday and it's easy to transmit to each of your employees so they can figure out if they are editing or writing. It's a natural construct, you generally know when somebody asks you to do something, am I writing or am I editing? So an editor is the best metaphor for your job. And we are going to talk about the specific things you are doing in editing.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': "[On productivity] Turn off notifications. Quit Slack when you're doing deep work. Check your emails once a day and just literally go through them in five minutes. Oftentimes, most of them use lists. Check Slack only at the top of the hour. Use Slack snooze or reminders. I mean, there's a whole other podcast we can talk about over Slack channels and how to organize that, but just get really good at the tools you're using. I think the first year of consulting, we just got really good at Excel and Excel shortcuts, and it was a big part of our training. And so just train yourself and train your teams on how to use their tools, how to use your calendar, how to use Slack, how to use email, whatever the tool you've designed as the right tool for you. Be dogmatic.", 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript'}, {'text': "It's not something I've changed, it's more something that our head of design, Diego, has changed. Basically having designers spend more time creating more visionary prototypes and then sharing those out in videos. It just has just huge impact on how exciting work is and how excited the team are. And so just providing that clarity is massive. And I think just, again, Figma and Loom and prototypes that actually are interactive so people can actually play around with it is a huge way to unlock velocity.", 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript'}, {'text': "So my partner bought me this WHOOP recently. Wearing it now. It gives you this real-time stress signal. That's pretty helpful. But I think it's a great product in terms of just actual insights. It's very data-driven, so it'll tell you ... You have a daily journal of all the things you did that day and it'll correlate what you did that day to your recovery score or how healthy you are for that day. And so it'll give you insights around how certain actions you take will have impact on your next day's health, which is all about heart rate variability. I thought it was just a great way to continue to focus on your health. I think running a team has a huge impact on your physical health, on your mental health, and I think you are an athlete at a high growth startup or even a small business or a large company. And focusing on that health is really, really important. So any tools like the WHOOP to invest into that is great.", 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript'}, {'text': 'And I think an important element there is the initial people you hire end up impacting the next batch and the next set because they see, "Wow, this person is working at Ramp. That\'s incredible. I got to look at that." So there\'s an early compounding effect, too, that happens.', 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript'}, {'text': "And so I can write blogs all day on how we increased velocity, but if there's one thing to take away from this is that empowered and talented engineers and designers are the biggest reason why Ramp was so successful and it's something that requires a ton of focus. I mean, early on for the first year at Ramp, Karim, our CTO, was only focused on that. It was hiring the best talent. He was a lot less interested or focused on our product strategy, our product market fit, or even our revenue. It was all about bringing in the best engineers and the best designers and that has had compounding effects on the company and the team.", 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript'}, {'text': 'Typically, the folks that join product teams are the highest performers outside of product that either understand the customer really well and can advise product or understand the product very well and can serve customers. And so my advice is for folks that want to break into that is to find a role that is adjacent to product that enables you to have those experiences and to prove yourself. So, for example, product operations is a good one. Business operations is a good one. More consulting sales engineering or solution engineering is a good one.', 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript'}, {'text': "We look for people who have a very strong desire to have impact. And the best way to assess that is the impact that they've had or the reason why they are switching jobs.\nSo, again, it goes back to what I was mentioning earlier in the chat, which was velocity leads to people wanting to join because they want to have velocity. And the best signal that is, I'm leaving because things got too slow, things got too bureaucratic. I missed the old days where we were just building and shipping and launching. I look for people who can think deeply, so I'll go super deep into a decision, a tradeoff that they had to make. And I'll really just scratch at that until I get to a deep understanding of how they make decisions and how deep they think about things. And in general, we tend to overemphasize those two skills rather than necessarily experience because experience ... Again, to the point around Ramp is a unique business, it matters a lot less. You can have a lot less impact than your ability to be hungry and your ability to think deeply.", 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript'}, {'text': "Your job is to make sure that they're aligned with the long-term vision and that they can deliver what they've committed to, but on top of that, they can do whatever the hell they want. And if they're taking on something that puts the things that they committed to at risk, they'll communicate that. So, again, that proactiveness, that desire to help, that desire to improve that accountability on their product. If their product isn't performing, if their product has feedback, are they doing it themselves or they need you to push them? So those are all mentality and culture aspects.", 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript'}, {'text': "[On identifying A players] Yeah, it's very hard to identify. A few things. One is, does the engineer want to win in the market? Does the engineer really care about winning against competitors, winning the hearts and minds of the customer? Do they understand the business context in which they operate by which they need to do that?\nAre they curious about how the company makes money, about what customers love and don't love, about what the most important project is and why it's important? They're asking you questions about the business outside of just the engineering domains. Are they able to execute on what they said they were going to execute without your help or do you actually feel like you need to be behind them? Are they the one actually setting the pace, asking you to keep up with your specs, keep up with your decisions, respond more quickly to the things that are blocking them, bringing more PMs or more designers to do more things? Are they being proactive in different channels where you think it's actually your job, but actually they'll jump in anyways?", 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript'}, {'text': "So making everyone feel like a PM is a great way to get leverage as a PM, and that means basically empowering the designer to think about the actual specs and priorities and scopes more than you or empower the engineer to take something that's fairly lightweight in terms of a spec or direction and actually think through it deeply and come back with some great questions that the PM hasn't thought through.", 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript'}, {'text': "So that's what I would do is just spend a lot more time on the processing, be extremely good at just task management, and then grouping things, and then the next day, creating your calendar aligned to the goals that you've set for yourself the day before in terms of the tactical, where you group those tactical tasks together and then the more strategic deep thinking, walking out that additional space.", 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript'}, {'text': "I don't spend time just grooming. So at the end of the day, I use notes. I have just a page-long thing of all the things I need to get done, all the things people need to get done for me. And then I spend time grooming, which is basically just trying to group things together in logical chunks, grouping the tactical versus the strategic, the important versus the less important.\nI group also what other people owe me and I Slack them what they owe me and I put a reminder on Slack for when they owe it to me by. And that way, it's just out of sight, out of mind.\nI think that the high-level theme is I try to create or free up headspace for processing, not memory. And so I just basically spend very little time memorizing anything and I write everything down.", 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript'}, {'text': "If you're a manager and, like me, you're in back-to-back meetings from 10:00 to 6:00, it's very easy to be completely overwhelmed with a sheer amount of stuff you need to do. And so I've invested over time in just a very robust but fairly simple task management process, which is, at the end of every meeting, I would write down the tasks that I owe and the tasks that someone else owes and I would write them down to as clearly as possible, not some vague thing, but a very clear thing and just when I need to get this done by.", 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript'}, {'text': "Because we're really anti-meeting at Ramp, I had time in my calendar. And so what I would basically do is the Friday before I clocked out, I would look at the next week, I would look at the top questions that I needed to spend time thinking about, and I would block out that time. I also work on one day of the weekend in terms of deep work. I find that hanging out outside and doodling on my piece of paper, some thoughts is actually really refreshing because it doesn't feel like work. It feels like just me just philosophizing about something. And so, yeah, blocking out that time, finding a space where things are less busy, where you're not in a critical path either early mornings or later afternoons or a day on the weekend is the best path for it.", 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript'}, {'text': "All these things are really tough. And I found myself ... You could read things and that's helpful, but I don't think that reading makes you necessarily think better. It makes you more wise, but the best way to increase your capacity to think is to actually do the thinking. And so that's where I see writing. If you're able to write things clearly, you're able to think through things clearly.", 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript'}, {'text': "Throughout the years at Ramp, I was often faced with a problem or a question that I couldn't answer off the bat, and I had to go back to first principles. And the best way of doing that is to shut down your laptop, take out a piece of paper, write the question as simply as possible at the top of the paper, and just spend time just thinking about how to answer that question. And there were a ton of questions over time.", 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript'}, {'text': 'And what better way of holding the product team accountable for support other than having support report into product. And the second piece was that we believe that a lot of our value to our customers were because it was going to come from deeply understanding them, deeply listening to them, and moving on that feedback. And so instead of hiring people who were focused just on resolving the ticket, we incentivized people to actually decrease number of tickets over time and decrease deflection or increase deflection. And that required hiring a different breed of people that then became leaders in different parts of the organization as well.', 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript'}, {'text': 'So support reports into me. And the first principle there was saying, "Well, every support ticket is a failure of our product." We literally have that as a quote just posted on all those channels. It\'s a failure. And if the product works perfectly, no one should ever have to contact our support team.', 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript'}, {'text': "And the way to do that is to, again, align on that goal and give it to them and to problems to solve. If everyone feels like it's their team, it's their company, their mini company, then they will radically avoid burnout. But if they feel like the work is being pushed onto them, they feel like they're not aligned on the goal or they don't feel empowered with the solution, then the burnout will absolutely happen.", 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript'}, {'text': 'And I think that oftentimes CEOs would say, or leaders would say, "Hey, we\'ve got increased velocity, therefore let\'s just add these status meetings and let\'s add all this process and all these documents and all these ways to hold teams accountable." And that\'s just a huge way to demotivate people. And so I\'ve never had a status meeting. I\'ve never scheduled a status meeting. Statuses are done async. They are done in the systems by which they operate and largely they should be in real time. And meetings should be all about collaboration, ideation, decision-making, et cetera. So just look at your calendar and just kill as many things as possible and kill just unimportant process.', 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript'}, {'text': "Yeah. And you have to create a system by which those folks are getting that feedback. And so we've really focused on what are the control mechanisms that ensure that your high velocity doesn't tank the business. And so examples of that is we have a voice of customer processes where every single negative review that is shared to our products is shared back to the tech lead, the PM and the designer on a monthly basis. We report back NPS and CSAT. We report back operational overhead, meaning the percentage of tickets that come from your product area normalized by the number of users that are using that product. And that's a core contract that the team has to maintain a low or lower part of operational burden. We also have bugs and issues being directly assigned to the engineer that's on call. So they feel that pain and then they can continue, to your point, leveraging velocity to solve those problems. Velocity is just a magnitude, it's not necessarily a specific direction.", 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript'}, {'text': "And, again, it didn't use to start that way. I mean, when we first started, it was just me and another PM. I was fairly micromanaging in some areas. I think you build trust over time and you start having these contracts. And so as, I suppose, good more senior, they're basically publishing out the API by which they interact with me and we basically align on what's most important on each one on one. So I basically have teams ... All my directs post their goals every week first thing Monday.\nThe goal there is to also have them review each other's goals. I have a one-on-one template that I basically use to keep on track of how progress is being made, but I certainly don't spend the time in the one on one going into that. I spend the one on one just focusing on what they need from me. And then on a biweekly basis, I have a team-wide meeting where I share context that everyone is missing and we go deep on the most important topics of the day.", 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript'}, {'text': "You should be debating the interpretation of data, you should be debating the hypotheses and the different ideas that you have there as to what's really going on or you should be debating the goals themselves. And so whenever things went wrong at Ramp, it was when I was being prescriptive with regards to the solution without actually explaining and aligning upstream on the goal, the hypothesis, and the data. And if you do that, you realize that the solutions actually can come much better from teams that are much closer to the ground.", 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript'}, {'text': "And so that's where you really just start alignment is, what is the goal that you're going after? What is the hypothesis that you have to reach that goal? What is the data by which you're coming up with that hypothesis? And then what is the potential solution to test that hypothesis?\nAnd oftentimes, more junior leaders, and I was certainly in that camp earlier on, kept focusing on the solutions and debating the right solution when in fact you should really be debating upstream of that.", 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript'}, {'text': 'And that product is moving in billions of dollars a year. And I think the recipe for all this is constantly small teams have a single-threaded focus, give them the resources they need to execute big lofty goals, very tight timelines, and then shield them from the chaos that is the rest of the organization.', 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript'}, {'text': 'There is a tendency to get to 95% done instead of 100% done. This creates ongoing project debt and mental overhead. It means that projects extend for longer than necessary. The DRI fights to avoid this by closing the loop.', 'person': 'Jacob Peters', 'source': 'https://nextplayso.substack.com/p/spotlight-superpower'}, {'text': 'We start every project by aligning on the definition of done. We fight to avoid expanding the definition during the project without reason. This allows us to effectively scope projects, understand the requirements, and close the loop.', 'person': 'Jacob Peters', 'source': 'https://nextplayso.substack.com/p/spotlight-superpower'}, {'text': "I don't really work with people who are not excellent. The way I define people who are excellent, strong, average, or below average is pretty simple. They should be like a self-guided missile. Excellent people select a goal themselves, press the button, and reach the goal. Strong people need to be shown the goal, and they reach it without iteration. Average people require weekly iteration to reach the goal. Below-average people often donāt reach the goal even with iteration. The key is to select strong or excellent direct reports who reach the goal themselves without you.", 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXubBqd8uXs'}, {'text': '[On assessing performance] Well, they just give them the goals. Then you have weekly or bi-weekly catchups, and they show you what they produced. You observe what they produced for two or three weeks to see how small or deep their analysis is, based on what they show you.', 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXubBqd8uXs'}, {'text': "So what I basically believe is where there is low consequence and you have very low confidence in your own opinion, you should absolutely delegate. And delegate completely, let people make mistakes and learn. On the other side, obviously where the consequences are dramatic and you have extremely high conviction that you are right, you actually can't let your junior colleague make a mistake. You're ultimately responsible for that mistake and it's really important. You just can't allow that to happen. Now the best way to do that is to actually explain your thinking why. It's easy to shortcut when you get busy explaining ways in the world but it's very important to try.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs'}, {'text': "So how do you both delegate but not abdicate? It's a pretty tricky challenge, both are sins. You over delegate and you abdicate, or you micromanage, those are both sins. So I'm going to give you\xa0a couple techniques for solving this. First, and this actually came from High Output Management and Andy Grove, is called task relevant maturity. It's a fancy phrase for, has this person ever done this before? It's really simple, how mature is this person in doing something? And the more they have done the exact same task before, the more rope you are going to give them. And the more they are trying something new, the more you are going to instruct them and constantly monitor. This is a basic concept but it's worth keeping in the back of your brain. The interesting implication, and this is pretty radical, is that any executive, any CEO, should not have one management style. Your management style should be dictated by your employee. So with one particular person, you may be very much a micromanager because they are quite low on this scale. And with another person,, you may be delegating a lot because they are quite mature on this scale.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs'}, {'text': "Second thing editors do, is they ask you clarifying questions. When you present a paper to someone, what do they usually do? They find some ambiguity somewhere and ask, do you really mean this? Did you really mean that? Give me an example of this? That's what your job is. So you are in a meeting, people are going to look to you. And the real thing you do, is you ask a lot of questions. And they can be simple basic questions like should we try this seven days a week? Or six days? They can be fundamental questions like, whereās our competitive advantage here?", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs'}, {'text': "Basically eliminating things, the biggest task of an editor is to simplify, simplify, simplify and that usually means omitting things. So that's your job too, is to clarify and simplify for everybody on your team. The more you simplify, the better people will perform. People can not understand and keep track of a long complicated set of initiatives.\xa0So you have to distill it down to one, two, or three things and use a framework they can repeat, they can repeat without thinking about, they can repeat to their friends, they can repeat at night.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs'}, {'text': "You have to not micromanage. You have to continually give people small areas of responsibility. These are not the things that founders think about.\xa0I think the best thing you can do as a first-time founder is to be aware that you will be a very bad manager and try to overcompensate for that.\xa0Dan Pink talks about these three things that motivate people to do great work:\xa0autonomy, mastery, and purpose.\xa0I never thought about that when I was running my company but I've thought about since and I think thatās actually right. I think it's worth trying to think about that. It also took me a while to learn to do things like one on one and to give clear feedback.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': 'Whenever there are problems to solve, donāt just meet with your managers. Do a skip level, where you meet with the level right below your managers. ', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': "'Musk found himself flying across the country to pay visits - sometimes surprise ones - on the contractors to check on their progress'\n", 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-SpaceX-Fantastic-Future/dp/006230125X'}], 'people': ['Elon Musk', 'Geoff Charles', 'Jacob Peters', 'Keith Rabois', 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'Sam Altman'], 'sources': ['https://nextplayso.substack.com/p/spotlight-superpower', 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/', 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-SpaceX-Fantastic-Future/dp/006230125X', 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281', 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXubBqd8uXs']}
{'name': 'Managing risk āļø', 'count': 6, 'people_count': 5, 'sources_count': 5, 'quotes': [{'text': 'Any given ābetā you take is likely to fail. Success is making lots of ābetsā and trying as hard as possible at each of them. P(success) is higher the more bets you take & the better your execution per bet. (This is also why fast cycle time is so important). Ravin first articulated this to me.', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'You are probably too risk-averse. Write out the worst things that can happen, realize theyāre not that bad, then take the leap.', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': "I learned early on that no matter how smart you are, you cannot predict what will happen. For me, the best approach is to try things and use quantitative feedback to determine if they work. If they do, I continue in the same direction; if not, it's fine to move on.f", 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZcTLjMTVZ4'}, {'text': 'founders are not actually risk takers, they are risk mitigators. They understand all the variables [that] could go wrong in their business and they work feverishly to fix those things and to make sure that the business is on good footing.', 'person': 'Roelof Botha', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQAZ3iV3gSg&list=TLGGp__Zzi2H69UzMTEwMjAyNA'}, {'text': 'Like the decision to forgo slosh baffles on the early version of the Falcon 1, taking these risks turned out to be a mistake. Itās unlikely that NASA or Boeing, with their stay-safe approach, would have made those decisions. But Musk believed in a fail-fast approach to building rockets. Take risks. Learn by blowing things up. Revise. Repeat. āWe donāt want to design to eliminate every risk,ā he said. āOtherwise, we will never getanywhere.ā', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': 'We have a culture of taking risks. I prefer you take a shot. Iād rather have someone who gets A, F, F, A than someone that gets B+, B+, B+, B+. I prefer people who ask for forgiveness rather than for permission. You have to be willing to put yourself out of business by trying new things, before someone else does.', 'person': 'Doug Leone', 'source': 'https://www.sequoiacap.com/people/doug-leone/'}], 'people': ['Doug Leone', 'Elon Musk', 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'Roelof Botha'], 'sources': ['https://nabeelqu.co/principles', 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281', 'https://www.sequoiacap.com/people/doug-leone/', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZcTLjMTVZ4', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQAZ3iV3gSg&list=TLGGp__Zzi2H69UzMTEwMjAyNA']}
{'name': 'Managing time ā³', 'count': 8, 'people_count': 5, 'sources_count': 6, 'quotes': [{'text': "Turns out the answer is tomorrow, and the reason it's useful for you is you will always have enough time for the things you choose to prioritize. And so you have to decide what you're going to procrastinate and what you're going to prioritize if you want to achieve what you want to achieve, because you all are an incredible place. You all have incredible talent, otherwise you wouldn't even be here, and this place provides you with all the opportunity you need. You just have to decide what to make it.", 'person': 'Roelof Botha', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQAZ3iV3gSg&list=TLGGp__Zzi2H69UzMTEwMjAyNA'}, {'text': "How does responsibility constrain you? The worst thing is that it allows you not to focus on real work. Just as the most dangerous forms of procrastination are those that seem like work, the danger of responsibilities is not just that they can consume a whole day, but that they can do it without setting off the kind of alarms you'd set off if you spent a whole day sitting on a park bench.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/marginal.html'}, {'text': "The lives of the eminent become scheduled, and that's not good for thinking. One of the great advantages of being an outsider is long, uninterrupted blocks of time. That's what I remember about grad school: apparently endless supplies of time, which I spent worrying about, but not writing, my dissertation. Obscurity is like health food ā unpleasant, perhaps, but good for you. Whereas fame tends to be like the alcohol produced by fermentation. When it reaches a certain concentration, it kills off the yeast that produced it.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/marginal.html'}, {'text': 'A very structured calendar to have time for unstructured thinking. No meeting in the morning with focus time on deep topics. Dedicated time where I check my emails, slack, and contribute to issues (otherwise those tools are closed). My interviews and discussions happen in the afternoon. Before lockdown, I was trying to have lunch with the team every day.', 'person': 'Jean-Charles Samuelian', 'source': 'https://alan.com/en/blog/discover-alan/a/self-organization-guide'}, {'text': 'Only agree to new commitments when both your head and your heart say yes...\n\nIn my experience, it takes time to tell the difference between your head saying yes and your heart saying yes.\n\nI think the key is whether youāre really excited about it.\n\nIf you get that little adrenaline spike (in a good way) when you think about it, then your heart is saying yes.\n\nThe corollary, of course, is that when your head says no and your heart says yes, your mouth should generally say yes as well :-).\n\nBut not when your head says yes and your heart says no.', 'person': 'Marc Andreessen', 'source': 'https://pmarchive.com/guide_to_personal_productivity.html'}, {'text': 'If it doesnāt go on the calendar, it is not getting done.', 'person': 'Marc Andreessen', 'source': 'https://a16z.com/marc-andreessen-on-productivity-scheduling-reading-habits-work-and-more/'}, {'text': 'The big thing is basically *everything* is on the calendar. Sleep is on the calendar, going to bed is in there and so is free time. Free time is critical because thatās the release valve. You can work full tilt for a long time as long as you know you have actual time for yourself coming up. I find if you donāt schedule enough free time, you get resentful of your own calendar. When I was younger, I didnāt really have the concept of turning off. But there comes a time, a little bit with age, when your body rebels. And obviously, if you have a family, thatās not great with a system where youāre just always working.', 'person': 'Marc Andreessen', 'source': 'https://a16z.com/marc-andreessen-on-productivity-scheduling-reading-habits-work-and-more/'}, {'text': 'I make sure to leave enough time in my schedule to think about what to work on. The best ways for me to do this are reading books, hanging out with interesting people, and spending time in nature.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/productivity'}], 'people': ['Jean-Charles Samuelian', 'Marc Andreessen', 'Paul Graham', 'Roelof Botha', 'Sam Altman'], 'sources': ['http://www.paulgraham.com/marginal.html', 'https://a16z.com/marc-andreessen-on-productivity-scheduling-reading-habits-work-and-more/', 'https://alan.com/en/blog/discover-alan/a/self-organization-guide', 'https://blog.samaltman.com/productivity', 'https://pmarchive.com/guide_to_personal_productivity.html', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQAZ3iV3gSg&list=TLGGp__Zzi2H69UzMTEwMjAyNA']}
{'name': 'Meetings šŖ', 'count': 55, 'people_count': 1, 'sources_count': 1, 'quotes': [{'text': '[What should meeting minutes include?] Minutes should tell the reader what is to be done, who is to do it, and when, and they should be sent out quickly before attendees forget what happened.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What should a meeting agenda include?] An agenda should clearly state the purpose of the meeting, as well as what role everybody there is expected to play to get the desired output.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[Who should attend a mission-oriented meeting?] The chairman must identify who should attend and then try to get those people to come. If someone invited canāt make it, see to it that he sends a person with the power to speak for him.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[How to assess meeting frequency?] The real sign of malorganization is when people spend more than 25 percent of their time in ad hoc mission-oriented meetings.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[When should you call a meeting?] Before calling a meeting, ask yourself: What am I trying to accomplish? Is a meeting necessary? Or desirable? Or justifiable? Donāt call a meeting if all the answers arenāt yes.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[How to justify the cost of meetings?] Determine the purpose of a meeting before committing your time and your companyās resources. Get it called off early if it makes no sense, and find a less costly way to pursue the matter.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What is the ideal size of a decision-making meeting?] Keep in mind that a meeting called to make a specific decision is hard to keep moving if more than six or seven people attend. Eight people should be the absolute cutoff.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[Why are meeting minutes important?] Once the meeting is over, the chairman must send out minutes that summarize the discussion, the decision made, and the actions to be taken.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What logistical responsibilities does the chairman have?] The chairman should ensure all necessary equipment is present, send out an agenda that states the purpose of the meeting, and clarify the role of each attendee.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': "[What is the chairman's key responsibility?] The chairman must have a clear understanding of the meetingās objectiveāwhat needs to happen and what decision has to be made.", 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[How to handle lateness at meetings?] It is criminal for the chairman to allow people to be late and waste everyoneās time. Wasting time means wasting the companyās money, with the meter ticking away at $100 per hour per person.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What is a mission-oriented meeting?] A mission-oriented meeting is usually held ad hoc and is designed to produce a specific output, frequently a decision.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[How should the audience view their role?] Regard attendance at the meeting for what it is: work.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[How can operation reviews motivate managers?] Managers making the presentations will want to leave a good impression on their supervisorās supervisor and on their outside peers.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[Who should organize the operation review?] The supervisor of the presenting managers should organize the meeting, help the presenters decide what to discuss, handle housekeeping, and act as the timekeeper.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What is the role of the reviewing manager?] The reviewing manager should ask questions, make comments, and in general impart the appropriate spirit to the meeting, acting as a catalyst to provoke audience participation.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[How should the supervisor manage time during presentations?] The supervisor should pace the presenters using inconspicuous gestures, so that the manager talking doesnāt suddenly find himself out of time with only half his points covered.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[Why should the reviewing manager avoid previewing the material?] The reviewing manager should never preview the material, since that will keep him from reacting spontaneously.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[How should presenters use visual aids?] Presenters should use visual aids such as tables, numbers, or graphics and aim for four minutes of presentation and discussion time per visual aid.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[How can presenters gauge audience engagement?] A presenter has to watch his audience like a hawk. Facial expressions and body language will tell him if people are getting the message, if he needs to stop and go over something again, or if he is boring them and should speed up.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[Why are operation reviews important for junior and senior managers?] The junior person will benefit from the comments, criticisms, and suggestions of the senior manager, who in turn will get a different feel for problems from people familiar with their details.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[How should the audience approach participation?] If a presenter makes a factual error, it is your responsibility to go on record. Lack of interest undermines the confidence of the presenter.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': "[What is the audience's role in an operation review?] The audience participates by asking questions and making comments, paying attention, and contributing to the discussion.", 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What is the purpose of an operation review?] The basic purpose of an operation review is to keep the teaching and learning going on between employees several organizational levels apart.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': 'Peer interactionāespecially decision-making by a group of peersāis not easy. Yet it is key to good management.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What should be discussed at a staff meeting?] Anything that affects more than two of the people present.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': 'A supervisor should never use staff meetings to pontificate, which is the surest way to undermine free discussion and hence the meetingās basic purpose.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': 'Staff meetings are an ideal medium for decision-making, because the group of managers present has typically worked together for a long time.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[How structured should the meeting be?] It should be mostly controlled, with an agenda issued far enough in advance that the subordinates will have had the chance to prepare their thoughts for the meeting.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': "[What should a meeting agenda include?] It should also include an 'open session'āa designated period of time for the staff to bring up anything they want.", 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[How to maintain effectiveness in meetings?] The supervisor should keep things on track, with the subordinates bearing the brunt of working the issues.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[If the meeting degenerates into a conversation between two people] the supervisor should break it off and move on to something else that will include more of the staff, while suggesting that the two continue their exchange later.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What is the role of the supervisor in the staff meeting?] The supervisorās most important roles are being a meetingās moderator and facilitator, and controller of its pace and thrust.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': 'A staff meeting is one in which a supervisor and all of his subordinates participate, and which therefore presents an opportunity for interaction among peers.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[About scheduling meetings] One-on-ones should be scheduled on a rolling basisāsetting up the next one as the meeting taking place ends.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[About preparation for meetings] With an outline, the supervisor knows at the outset what is to be covered and can therefore help to set the pace of the meeting according to the meatiness of the items on the agenda.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[About preparation for meetings] The subordinate should be asked to prepare an outline, which is very important because it forces him to think through in advance all of the issues and points he plans to raise.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[About techniques for effective questioning] Ask one more question! When the supervisor thinks the subordinate has said all he wants to about a subject, he should ask another question.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[About shared understanding] By sharing his base of information with me, the two of us developed a congruent attitude, approach, and conclusion.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[About the leverage of one-on-one meetings] Ninety minutes of your time can enhance the quality of your subordinateās work for two weeks, or for some eighty-plus hours, and also upgrade your understanding of what heās doing.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[About the supervisorās role] The supervisor is there to learn and to coach. The good time users among managers do not talk to their subordinates about their problems but they know how to make the subordinates talk about theirs.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[About discussing deeper issues] The supervisor should encourage the discussion of heart-to-heart issues during one-on-ones, because this is the perfect forum for getting at subtle and deep work-related problems affecting his subordinate.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[About note-taking during meetings] Many issues in a one-on-one lead to action required on the part of the subordinate. When he takes a note immediately following the supervisorās suggestion, the act implies a commitment, like a handshake, that something will be done.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[About time-saving methods] A real time-saver is using a hold file where both the supervisor and subordinate accumulate important but not altogether urgent issues for discussion at the next meeting.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[About how long one-on-one meetings should last] I feel that a one-on-one should last an hour at a minimum. Anything less, in my experience, tends to make the subordinate confine himself to simple things that can be handled quickly.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[About note-taking during meetings] Both the supervisor and subordinate should have a copy of the outline and both should take notes on it, which serves a number of purposes.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[About what should be covered in one-on-one meetings] The meeting should cover anything important that has happened since the last meeting: current hiring problems, people problems in general, organizational problems and future plans, andāvery, very importantāpotential problems.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[About where one-on-one meetings should take place] I think you should have the meeting in or near the subordinateās work area if possible. A supervisor can learn a lot simply by going to his subordinateās office.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[About the subordinateās role] It should be regarded as the subordinateās meeting, with its agenda and tone set by him.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[About how long one-on-one meetings should last] The subordinate must feel that there is enough time to broach and get into thorny issues.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': 'At Intel, a one-on-one is a meeting between a supervisor and a subordinate, and it is the principal way their business relationship is maintained. Its main purpose is mutual teaching and exchange of information. By talking about specific\nproblems and situations, the supervisor teaches the subordinate his skills and know-how, and suggests ways to approach things. At the same time, the subordinate provides the supervisor with detailed information about what he is\ndoing and what he is concerned about. From what I can tell, regularly scheduled one-on-ones are highly unusual outside of Intel. When I ask a manager from another company about the practice, I usually get an āOh no, I donāt need scheduled meetings with my supervisor [or subordinate]; I see him several times a day..." But there is an enormous difference between a casual encounter by a supervisor and a subordinate, or even a meeting (mission-oriented) to resolve a specific problem, and a one-on-one.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': 'At Intel we use three kinds of process-oriented meetings: the one-on-one, the staff meeting, and the operation review.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': 'To make the most of this kind of meeting [process-oriented meeting], we should aim to infuse it with regularity. In other words, the people attending should know how the meeting is run, what kinds of substantive matters are discussed, and what is to be accomplished. It should be designed to allow a manager to ābatchā transactions, to use the same āproductionā set-up time and effort to take care of many similar managerial tasks. Moreover, given the regularity, you and the others attending can begin to forecast the time required for the kinds of work to be done. Hence, a āproduction controlā system, as recorded on various calendars, can take shape, which means that a scheduled meeting will have minimum impact on other things people are doing.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': 'The two basic managerial roles produce two basic kinds of meetings. In the first kind of meeting, called a process-oriented meeting, knowledge is shared and information is exchanged. Such meetings take place on a regularly scheduled basis. The purpose of the second kind of meeting is to solve a specific problem. Meetings of this sort, called mission-oriented, frequently produce a decision. They are ad hoc affairs, not scheduled long in advance, because they usually canāt be.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': 'But there is another way to regard meetings. Earlier we said that a big part of a middle managerās work is to supply information and know-how, and to impart a sense of the preferred method of handling things to the groups under his control and influence. A manager also makes and helps to make decisions. Both kinds of basic managerial tasks can only occur during face-to face encounters, and therefore only during meetings. Thus I will assert again that a meeting is nothing less than the medium through which managerial work is performed. That means we should not be fighting their very existence, but rather using the time spent in them as efficiently as possible.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}], 'people': ['Andy Grove'], 'sources': ['https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management']}
{'name': 'Mental health š ', 'count': 8, 'people_count': 6, 'sources_count': 6, 'quotes': [{'text': 'Tell the right stories about yourself. One of the more underrated insights you can get from reading self-help books is that the story you tell yourself about yourself matters. If you tell yourself youāre very energetic person, that feeling tired is temporary, and you keep this belief going, you actually become more energetic. If you tell yourself you donāt get jetlagged, you might get less jetlagged on average. This goes for many other traits, too -- you can psyop yourself into believing lots of things about yourself which then come true, and make you more like the person you want to be.', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/advice'}, {'text': 'To stay calm under pressure, you need a lot of energy. To have a lot of energy, you need to build a lifestyle that brings energyālike through sports.', 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXubBqd8uXs'}, {'text': 'Highs that donāt lead to subsequent lows:\n\nā¢ Meditation, gratitude, prayer, journaling, unconditional love.\n\nā¢ Yoga, exercise, play, nature walks.\n\nā¢ Creating art, reading for fun, singing, poetry.\n\nā¢ Practicing a craft, pursuing curiosity, work done for its own sake, flow.', 'person': 'Naval Ravikant', 'source': 'https://x.com/navalismhq/status/1860932932782748107?s=46&t=qgopL_Y6F84neSIfv-BoPA'}, {'text': "If you really want to be a first-class scientist you need to know yourself, your weaknesses, your strengths, and your bad faults, like my egotism. How can you convert a fault to an asset? How can you convert a situation where you haven't got enough manpower to move into a direction when that's exactly what you need to do? I say again that I have seen, as I studied the history, the successful scientist changed the viewpoint and what was a defect became an asset.", 'person': 'Richard Hamming', 'source': 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html'}, {'text': "'Their decisions go bad. Elon gets hyperrational. Heās still able to make very clear, longterm decisions. The harder it gets, the better he gets. Anyone who saw what he went through firsthand came away with more respect for the guy. Iāve just never seen anything like his ability to take pain.'", 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-SpaceX-Fantastic-Future/dp/006230125X'}, {'text': '[On church bells ringing] Quite often people thought I was meditating on a campaign plan or a law when I was simply resting my mind by abandoning myself to the earliest impressions of my life.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'You know, my dear doctor, the art of healing is simply the art of lulling and calming the imagination. ', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'You must tranquilize your mind: this is the best way to cure the body.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}], 'people': ['Elon Musk', 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'Napoleon', 'Naval Ravikant', 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'Richard Hamming'], 'sources': ['https://nabeelqu.co/advice', 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-SpaceX-Fantastic-Future/dp/006230125X', 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230', 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXubBqd8uXs', 'https://x.com/navalismhq/status/1860932932782748107?s=46&t=qgopL_Y6F84neSIfv-BoPA']}
{'name': 'Mental models š§ ', 'count': 10, 'people_count': 2, 'sources_count': 3, 'quotes': [{'text': 'Be very suspicious of a priori arguments on empirical matters (e.g. āAI will certainly kill everyoneā), theyāre usually wrong no matter how convincing. Reality is endlessly surprising. (Cf. Knightian uncertainty.)', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'Understand power laws. Outlier math rules all.', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'If you really canāt disprove something, it has a chance of being right. (Fallibilism.)', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'Form opinions on things and then find the strongest critique of those opinions. Repeat. ', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'Map out problems using logic trees. This is a classic problem-solving and brainstorming technique, also known as morphological analysis. Itāll be familiar to any consultant, as itās 80% of their secret sauce. \n\nTake a problem, say analyzing a businessās profits (as in consulting). Break it down into logically exhaustive possibilities, e.g. ārevenueā and ācostsā. Break down each branch further into its component parts, e.g. revenue becomes price * quantity. Follow this process recursively, each time breaking the tree down into components.\n\nNow you have a full map of the possibilities and can start to answer questions like āhow do we increase profits?ā by listing out all available options. This often helps you spot options that other people will overlook...\n\nI found this technique especially useful when tackling ambiguous problems in a startup. Questions that seem like āhow do we grow faster?ā, can be reduced to lower-level components that are easier to reason and brainstorm about, and because youāre making sure each ālayerā of the tree is mutually exhaustive, youāre not missing anything. ', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/advice'}, {'text': 'Whenever you make a claim or an argument, try and imagine the strongest possible argument against it. In chess, a thing that distinguishes a good player from a worse one is that the good player tests their potential move against the opponentās strongest possible replies. Weak players often play āhope chessā: they launch an attack, and assume their opponents will go along with their plans by playing weak responses. As a result they donāt see how their attack might fail, and they lose.\n\nStronger players make a mental habit of checking their opponentās strongest responses and this allows them to pick the move that is in fact the best one.\n\nThis sounds obvious, but itās actually very hard to do and requires practice and training: itās as though your brain resists the mental motion of modeling your opponent as strong too, as though it āwantsā the idea to work and blocks you from thinking about the resources your opponent actually has.\n\nA similar thing goes in life: people very rarely model out the very best arguments against their positions and then adjust accordingly. Itās hard to do, itās painful, and the rewards are not obvious unless you strongly care about truth. But if you do want true beliefs, this mental habit is essential.', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/advice'}, {'text': 'A related helpful thinking technique is putting bounds on things: āwell, itās not as high as X, and itās not as low as Y, so given that itās somewhere in between those numbers we can assume itās roughly Zā. \n\nFor example, if I ask you when strong human level AGI will come about, you might experience some mental paralysis, or just answer honestly that you donāt know. But you do have some intuitions here, which this exercise draws out: youād be very surprised if it came about next month, and youād probably also be surprised if humanity hadnāt invented it by 2150, say, so you can at least conclude that your model of the world predicts that itās likely to fall somewhere in between next month and 2150. Well, thatās already a surprising conclusion! It implies that your grandkids will probably see AGI. Not so far away, is it?', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/advice'}, {'text': 'Get in the habit of Fermi estimation, looking up key quantities, and using upper and lower bounds. Iāve noticed a lot of the smartest people I know do this: they donāt take any claims at face value, and check for themselves whether theyāre plausible. This means, e.g. when they hear a fact, theyāll look it up to assure themselves that itās true, because often people cite things that are false or partial.\n\nEngineers and physicists are trained to do this, everyone else has to learn. The usual name for this is Fermi estimation: estimating the rough order of magnitude of an unknown quantity using information that you already know.\n\nMost people donāt do this at all ā they donāt āthink in numbersā, and the result is that theyāre easily fooled. Every now and then thereās a Twitter meme that goes like āIf Elon sent money to every American instead of spending it all on the rockets, [etc.]ā and this will go viral because people do not do the math. I noticed this during COVID, too, during those periods in between COVID waves: the risk of getting COVID would drop a hundredfold or more, but people would āunder-correctā their behavior, remaining too risk-averse during relatively safe times, and too risk-loving during times of high infection risk, simply because they didnāt get a sense of local case numbers and convert those into probabilities.', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/advice'}, {'text': "To end this part, I'll remind you, it is a poor workman who blames his tools - the good man gets on with the job, given what he's got, and gets the best answer he can.' And I suggest that by altering the problem, by looking at the thing differently, you can make a great deal of difference in your final productivity because you can either do it in such a fashion that people can indeed build on what you've done, or you can do it in such a fashion that the next person has to essentially duplicate again what you've done. It isn't just a matter of the job, it's the way you write the report, the way you write the paper, the whole attitude. It's just as easy to do a broad, general job as one very special case. And it's much more satisfying and rewarding!", 'person': 'Richard Hamming', 'source': 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html'}, {'text': 'I think that if you look carefully you will see that often the great scientists, by turning the problem around a bit, changed a defect to an asset.', 'person': 'Richard Hamming', 'source': 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html'}], 'people': ['Nabeel S Quereshi', 'Richard Hamming'], 'sources': ['https://nabeelqu.co/advice', 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles', 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html']}
{'name': 'Motivation š¼', 'count': 18, 'people_count': 10, 'sources_count': 14, 'quotes': [{'text': '[On why he runs his company] Iām surprised no one asks this, but I ask myself many times. I have two answers: a) what else to do, and b) I need to do somethingāotherwise, itās boring.', 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXubBqd8uXs'}, {'text': "[On success] If you define success by the percentage of goals reached, itās very simple. If your goal is to be happily married with kids and you achieve it, you're 100% successful. If your goal is to make more money and you havenāt reached it, then youāre not. Itās a simple definition.", 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXubBqd8uXs'}, {'text': "Obviously, if you achieve something great, you need to celebrate. For me, it's about five minutes of happiness before moving on to the next big thing.", 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZcTLjMTVZ4'}, {'text': 'From 2007 onwards, until maybe last year, itās been nonstop pain. Thereās a gun to your head, make Tesla work, pull a rabbit out of your hat, then pull another rabbit out of the hat. A stream of rabbits flying through the air. If the next rabbit does not come out, youāre dead. It takes a toll. You canāt be in a constant fight for survival, always in adrenaline mode, and not have it hurt you. But thereās something else Iāve found this year. Itās that fighting to survive keeps you going for quitea while. When you are no longer in asurvive-or-die mode, itās not that easy to get motivated every day.', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': 'āTechnology does not automatically progress,ā Musk said. āThis flight was a great example of how progress requires human agency.ā', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': 'Performance. Do you bring it everyday? You canāt always be at 110%, but when itās playoff time the great players know how to bring it. You have to take as many people along with you for the ride. Teams always beat individuals. I love founders who are spiky, in any dimension. Itās never about money but about doing something meaningful. They do the impossible and you have to learn to dream with them, while helping them to build a business.', 'person': 'Doug Leone', 'source': 'https://www.sequoiacap.com/people/doug-leone/'}, {'text': 'give yourself a lot of shots to get lucky is even better advice than it appears on the surface. luck isnāt an independent variable but increases super-linearly with more surface areaāyou meet more people, make more connections between new ideas, learn patterns, etc.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://twitter.com/sama/status/1695775873545183584?s=20'}, {'text': 'Ninety-nine percent of people in the world are convinced they are incapable of achieving great things, so they aim for the mediocre. The level of competition is thus fiercest for ārealisticā goals, paradoxically making them the most time- and energy-consuming. If you are insecure, guess what? The rest of the world is, too. Do not overestimate the competition and underestimate yourself. You are better than you think. Unreasonable and unrealistic goals are easier to achieve for yet another reason. Having an unusually large goal is an adrenaline infusion that provides the endurance to overcome the inevitable trials and tribulations that go along with any goal. Realistic goals, goals restricted to the average ambition level, are uninspiring and will only fuel you through the first or second problem, at which point you throw in the towel. If the potential payoff is mediocre or average, so is your effort. The fishing is best where the fewest go, and the collective insecurity of the world makes it easy for people to hit home runs while everyone else is aiming for base hits. There is just less competition for bigger goals.', 'person': 'Tim Ferriss', 'source': 'https://x.com/tferriss/status/1687979233451126784?s=46&t=qgopL_Y6F84neSIfv-BoPA'}, {'text': "Work has ups and downs. Don't let the downs spook you. When you hit a down, you'll feel like you're never going to have another idea. But don't worry, you will. Follow your curiosity and eventually you'll get rolling again.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'https://x.com/paulg/status/1688327150058033152?s=46&t=qgopL_Y6F84neSIfv-BoPA'}, {'text': "I found out many times, like a cornered rat in a real trap, I was surprisingly capable. I have found that it paid to say, oh yes, I'll get the answer for you Tuesday, not having any idea how to do it. By Sunday night I was really hard thinking on how I was going to deliver by Tuesday. I often put my pride on the line and sometimes I failed, but as I said, like a cornered rat I'm surprised how often I did a good job. I think you need to learn to use yourself. I think you need to know how to convert a situation from one view to another which would increase the chance of success. ", 'person': 'Richard Hamming', 'source': 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html'}, {'text': "The steady application of effort with a little bit more work, intelligently applied is what does it. That's the trouble; drive, misapplied, doesn't get you anywhere. I've often wondered why so many of my good friends at Bell Labs who worked as hard or harder than I did, didn't have so much to show for it. The misapplication of effort is a very serious matter. Just hard work is not enough - it must be applied sensibly. ", 'person': 'Richard Hamming', 'source': 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html'}, {'text': "What you believe determines what you think. What you think determines what you prioritize, and what you prioritize determines of what you do, and what you do determines whether or not you're successful. ", 'person': 'Jason Droege', 'source': 'https://jcnews.substack.com/p/scaling-innovation-tips-from-uber'}, {'text': '- donāt be intimidated. most of what is changing the world today has been invented in the past few years. we are all novices', 'person': 'Alexandr Wang', 'source': 'https://twitter.com/alexandr_wang/status/1637638523066150912?s=20'}, {'text': 'When on rising from sleep a man does not know what to do with himself and drags his tedious existence from place to place; when, scanning the future, he sees nothing but dreadful monotony, one day resembling the next; when he asks himself, āWhy do I existā - then, in my opinion, he is the most wretched of all. His machine breaks down, his heart loses the energy that is proper to man. How can this empty heart manage to exist? To live thus is to lead the life of beasts with the moral faculties peculiar to our nature.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'Something about focus and determination and drive to win and perform at your highest level. I think one thing that is a really important thing to strive for is being internally driven, being driven to compete with yourself, not with other people. If you compete with other people, you end up in this mimetic trap, and you sort of play this tournament, and if you win, you lose.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://conversationswithtyler.com/episodes/sam-altman/'}, {'text': 'Managing your own moraleāand your teamās moraleāis one of the greatest challenges of most endeavours. Itās almost impossible without a lot of self-belief.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/how-to-be-successful'}, {'text': 'Like most people, I sometimes go through periods of a week or two where I just have no motivation to do anything (I suspect it may have something to do with nutrition). This sucks and always seems to happen at inconvenient times. I have not figured out what to do about it besides wait for the fog to lift, and to trust that eventually it always does. And I generally try to avoid people and situations that put me in bad moods, which is good advice whether you care about productivity or not.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/productivity'}, {'text': 'Self-belief is immensely powerful. The most successful people I know believe in themselves almost to the point of delusion. Cultivate this early. As you get more data points that your judgment is good and you can consistently deliver results, trust yourself more.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/how-to-be-successful'}], 'people': ['Alexandr Wang', 'Doug Leone', 'Elon Musk', 'Jason Droege', 'Napoleon', 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'Paul Graham', 'Richard Hamming', 'Sam Altman', 'Tim Ferriss'], 'sources': ['https://blog.samaltman.com/how-to-be-successful', 'https://blog.samaltman.com/productivity', 'https://conversationswithtyler.com/episodes/sam-altman/', 'https://jcnews.substack.com/p/scaling-innovation-tips-from-uber', 'https://twitter.com/alexandr_wang/status/1637638523066150912?s=20', 'https://twitter.com/sama/status/1695775873545183584?s=20', 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281', 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230', 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html', 'https://www.sequoiacap.com/people/doug-leone/', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXubBqd8uXs', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZcTLjMTVZ4', 'https://x.com/paulg/status/1688327150058033152?s=46&t=qgopL_Y6F84neSIfv-BoPA', 'https://x.com/tferriss/status/1687979233451126784?s=46&t=qgopL_Y6F84neSIfv-BoPA']}
{'name': 'Networking šøļø', 'count': 13, 'people_count': 8, 'sources_count': 10, 'quotes': [{'text': 'Donāt network, make friends. Writing online is great for bringing interesting people your way. Having a wide network of friends really makes a difference to the opportunities you get and how easy it is to launch your projects.', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'There are some people who, after you talk to them, you feel more energized and you want to conquer the world or climb a mountain or something. Theyāre rare but they exist. Go find them and make friends with them.', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'Send more cold emails. People respond! Assume everyoneās your friend. ', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': "The world's a small place. Silicon Valley is an incredibly small place. And one of the taglines I have is friends come and go, enemies accumulate. And if you look around this auditorium, if you look around your classroom at the GSB. They're going to be lots of your friends or colleagues or classmates that do really interesting things and you should delight in that and take pleasure in their success.", 'person': 'Roelof Botha', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQAZ3iV3gSg&list=TLGGp__Zzi2H69UzMTEwMjAyNA'}, {'text': 'My best and most general life advice: Seek positive-sum systems and relationships; avoid zero/negative-sum systems and relationships', 'person': 'Paul Buchheit', 'source': 'https://twitter.com/paultoo/status/1694442846814961878?s=20'}, {'text': "I think it's very valuable to have first-class people around. I sought out the best people. The moment that physics table lost the best people, I left. The moment I saw that the same was true of the chemistry table, I left. I tried to go with people who had great ability so I could learn from them and who would expect great results out of me. By deliberately managing myself, I think I did much better than laissez faire.", 'person': 'Richard Hamming', 'source': 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html'}, {'text': 'In general, I think networking is a waste of time. If you focus on building something great or solving a specific problem, those things lead you to meeting really interesting people, but very organically. At this point, I have a fascinating network and a lot of people Iām proud to know, but I wouldnāt say I met any of them through networking.', 'person': 'Will Ahmed', 'source': 'https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/lifestyle/article/will-ahmed-whoop-tips-for-success'}, {'text': "'He realised that just by being in Los Angeles he would be surrounded be the worldās top aeronautics thinkers. They could help him refine any ideas, and there would be plenty of recruits to join his next venture.'\n", 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-SpaceX-Fantastic-Future/dp/006230125X'}, {'text': "But having good social skills confers life-long benefits. So, don't write them off. Get good at making a good first impression, being funny (if possible... this author still working on it...), speaking publicly.", 'person': 'Patrick Collison', 'source': 'https://patrickcollison.com/advice'}, {'text': "Make friends over the internet with people who are great at things you're interested in. The internet is one of the biggest advantages you have over prior generations. Leverage it.", 'person': 'Patrick Collison', 'source': 'https://patrickcollison.com/advice'}, {'text': 'Go out of your way to be around smart, interesting, ambitious people. Work for them and hire them (in fact, one of the most satisfying parts of work is forging deep relationships with really good people). Try to spend time with people who are either among the best in the world at what they do or extremely promising but totally unknown. It really is true that you become an average of the people you spend the most time with.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/the-days-are-long-but-the-decades-are-short'}, {'text': 'I make it a point to meet and help as many smart people as I can; besides being fun and interesting, this is important to getting things done.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/how-things-get-done'}, {'text': 'Doing great work usually requires colleagues of some sort. Try to be around smart, productive, happy, and positive people that donāt belittle your ambitions. I love being around people who push me and inspire me to be better.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/productivity'}], 'people': ['Elon Musk', 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'Patrick Collison', 'Paul Buchheit', 'Richard Hamming', 'Roelof Botha', 'Sam Altman', 'Will Ahmed'], 'sources': ['https://blog.samaltman.com/how-things-get-done', 'https://blog.samaltman.com/productivity', 'https://blog.samaltman.com/the-days-are-long-but-the-decades-are-short', 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles', 'https://patrickcollison.com/advice', 'https://twitter.com/paultoo/status/1694442846814961878?s=20', 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-SpaceX-Fantastic-Future/dp/006230125X', 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html', 'https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/lifestyle/article/will-ahmed-whoop-tips-for-success', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQAZ3iV3gSg&list=TLGGp__Zzi2H69UzMTEwMjAyNA']}
{'name': 'Operating structure āļø', 'count': 8, 'people_count': 3, 'sources_count': 3, 'quotes': [{'text': "Finally around metrics. One insight I have had over my career is what you, you kind of want to look for the anomalies. You don't actually want to look for the expected behavior. So a famous example was at PayPal. None of the top ten markets that the company was planning on going after included eBay. One day, someone noticed that 54 of the sellers actually handwritten into their eBay listings, please pay me with Paypal and brought this to the attention of the executive team at the time. The first reaction from the executive team was, what the hell is going on? Let's get them out of the system, that is not the focus. Fortunately, David Sacks came back the next day and said, I think we found our market. Let's actually build tools for these power sellers instead of forcing them to write into their listing, pay me with PayPal. Why don't we just have an HTML button that they can just insert? And that actually worked. Then he thought, why should we have them insert it each time? Why don't we just automatically insert it for them? They can just insert it once, then every listing they have forever will have it automagically appear there. So that became the success for PayPal.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': '[On pairing indicators] What you want to measure at the same rate as your fraud rate, is your false positive rate. That forces the team to actually innovate. Similarly, you can give recruiters metrics around hiring. And guess what? You will have a lot of people come in for interviews. But if you are not tracking the quality of interviewers, you may be very unhappy about the quality of people you are hiring and giving interviews to. So you always want to create the opposite and measure both. And the people responsible for that team need to be measured on both.', 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': "And finally, metrics. So you want to measure things. You want to measure outputs, not inputs. And again, you should dictate this yourself. You should draft the dashboard yourself to tie this all together. One important concept is pairing indicators. Which is, if you measure one thing and only one thing, the company tends not to optimize to that. And often at the expense of something that is important. Cost is example of payments and financial services is risk. It's really easy to give the risk team the objective and say, we want to lower our fraud rate. It sounds great. Until they start treating every user in this audience as a suspect because they want to lower the fraud rate. So they require each of you to call them up on the phone and give them more supplemental information and fax in things. Then you have the lowest fraud rate in the world, you also have the lowest level of customer satisfaction score.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': 'Another thing we did at Square is when we scaled, not everybody is going to get invited to every meeting, but they are going to want to go to every meeting. The way you scale that is you create notes for every meeting and you send them to the entire company. So we created notes at least for every single meeting that involved more than two people, somebody would write notes and send it to the entire company. So everyone felt that as the company added employees, they continued to track what was interesting, what was going on. And they never felt excluded, hopefully.', 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': "Another concept is transparency. Transparency people talk a lot about, it's a goal everybody ascribes to but when push comes to shove, very few people actually adhere to it. So let me walk through a little bit of transparency and different stages of transparency. Metrics are the first step. So everyone in your company should have access to what's going on. Other things I like to do, is to take your board decks. As you get more formal, the board decks will get more complicated. And actually review every single slide with every single employee after the board meeting. You can strip out the compensation information if you really want to. But every other slide you should go through with every single employee and explain it. If you can remember some of the feedback you got from your board that is really cool to pass on.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': "You don't want to be making all these decisions yourself. You have to create tools that enable people to make decisions at the same level you would make them yourself. So how do you create scale and leverage? The first thing I would recommend is to build a dashboard. This is an old Square dashboard, it looks pretty presentable even today. The construct of the dashboard should be drafted by the founder. You need to simplify the value proposition in the company's metrics for success on a whiteboard. You can have other people build the dashboard, I don't care about that. But you need to draw it out. Like what does business success look to us and key inputs to those and then have someone create something that is very intuitive for every single person in the company, including customer support to use. And then, the key metric of whether you succeed is what fraction of your employees use that dashboard every day? If it's actually useful, it should be close to 100%. It's not going to be probably 100% but you want to measure that. Just like you have quality scores for your other KPIās with users, your dashboard needs to be as intuitive as your product is for users.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': 'So a good way to keep momentum is to establish an operating rhythm at the company early. Where you ship product and launch new features on a regular basis. Where youāre reviewing metrics every week with the entire company.\xa0This is actually one of the best things your board can do for you. Boards add value to business strategy only rarely. But very frequently you can use them as a forcing function to get the company to care about metrics and milestones.\n\nOne thing that often disrupts momentum and really shouldnāt is competitors. Competitors making noise in the press I think probably crushes a companyās momentum more often than any other external factor.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': 'Every week\xa0we meet with all of the stakeholders and we go through in an hour and a half, two hours, we go through\xa0every element of the strategy for accomplishing our objectives.\xa0Also, the status of that.\xa0We actually color code all of the team members.\xa0Green itās on plan. Yellow, they have an issue but they have a solution. And red they have a new issue but theyāre still working on the solution for it.\xa0Having clear performance goals and\xa0one plan.\xa0Most companies have many plans and most people are trying to figure out what the plan is, as we all know. Many people, many leaders, if they have a red item, first of all, that embarrasses them, they think theyāre not doing their job, as opposed\xa0to that red item is a gem.\xa0I clap when you have a red because youāre not red, itās your item is red.\xa0Thanks for sharing that.\xa0Now we all can work together to help you and us turn the reds to yellows to greens. Every business plan review, weād get together and weād say\xa0thank you, how can I help?', 'person': 'Alan Mullally', 'source': 'https://jcnews.substack.com/p/scaling-innovation-tips-from-uber'}], 'people': ['Alan Mullally', 'Keith Rabois', 'Sam Altman'], 'sources': ['https://jcnews.substack.com/p/scaling-innovation-tips-from-uber', 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive']}
{'name': 'Organizational structure š§±', 'count': 3, 'people_count': 2, 'sources_count': 3, 'quotes': [{'text': "The second thing that I would say is the biggest waste of time is meetings and status updates. And I think that oftentimes CEOs would say, or leaders would say, 'Hey, we've got increased velocity, therefore let's just add these status meetings and let's add all this process and all these documents and all these ways to hold teams accountable.' And that's just a huge way to demotivate people. And so I've never had a status meeting. I've never scheduled a status meeting. Statuses are done async. They are done in the systems by which they operate and largely they should be in real time. And meetings should be all about collaboration, ideation, decision-making, et cetera. So just look at your calendar and just kill as many things as possible and kill just unimportant process.", 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennyspodcast.com/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp-became-the-fastest-growing-saas-startup-of-all-time-geoff-charl/#transcript'}, {'text': "Your organizational setup has a huge influence on speed of execution: 'Design your org the way you want your product to perform. Ultimately, you ship your org structure. Think about what are the core competencies you want to amplify to accomplish your product strategy. If Data is not an equal, you are not elevating data-driven decision-making, data-science-driven products, and objective accountability. This matters as you get larger.'", 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://ramp.com/blog/how-we-build-product-at-ramp'}, {'text': 'Build a strong organisational systemā¦ Systems that scale are flexibleā¦ But they have some core elementsā¦ Use the architecture analogy: you have some steel beams; theyāre holding up the whole structure; but then what you do around it is going to change as your needs changeā¦ My general way of thinking about our system is: (1) why do we exist as an organisation - increasing the GDP of the internet; and (2) what are our operating principles and also our founding documentsā¦ And then if you think about that mission and those principles or values as two anchor tendons on what is a steel core that should run through your whole company, then the operating system around it is going to organically changeā¦ The organisation is going to change. The structure is going to change. Who you have round the table is going to change. But if you are tilting on that axis, you are not going to lose the centre of gravity.', 'person': 'Claire Hughes-Johnson', 'source': 'https://youtu.be/vIHKzRub7ts?si=52B5e2X4bpbzHX2E&t=1146'}], 'people': ['Claire Hughes-Johnson', 'Geoff Charles'], 'sources': ['https://ramp.com/blog/how-we-build-product-at-ramp', 'https://www.lennyspodcast.com/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp-became-the-fastest-growing-saas-startup-of-all-time-geoff-charl/#transcript', 'https://youtu.be/vIHKzRub7ts?si=52B5e2X4bpbzHX2E&t=1146']}
{'name': 'Performance āļø', 'count': 2, 'people_count': 2, 'sources_count': 2, 'quotes': [{'text': 'āIām a big believer that a small number of exceptional people who are highly motivated can do better than a large number of people who are pretty good and moderately motivated,ā he told me at the end of that painful second week at Twitter.', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': 'Regardless of your specific job, it is vital to our team that you do that job at the highest possible level in all its various aspects, both mental and physical (i.e., good talent with bad attitude equals bad talent). ', 'person': 'Bill Walsh', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.fr/Score-Takes-Care-Itself-Philosophy/dp/1591843472'}], 'people': ['Bill Walsh', 'Elon Musk'], 'sources': ['https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281', 'https://www.amazon.fr/Score-Takes-Care-Itself-Philosophy/dp/1591843472']}
{'name': 'Physical health šŖ', 'count': 14, 'people_count': 9, 'sources_count': 11, 'quotes': [{'text': 'Donāt sleep too much. Oversleeping also comes at the cost of time youāll never get back. Moreover, thereās a good amount of evidence that sleeping more than you need is bad for you. Usually people will tell you to get more sleep, but I think this is the wrong direction for many people. The sweet spot seems to be somewhere around 7-7.30 hours, although again this is a genetic thing and can vary!\n\nSome people claim that this is purely psychological and that you can train yourself to get by on four hours a night, but this has never worked for me. Iām making the weaker claim: there is a big difference between 7 hours and 9 hours, you can do a lot with those 2 hours, and often if youāre a 9 hour sleeper you can become a 7 hour sleeper, which will end up compounding if you use those extra 2 hours well. [2] So itās worth adopting the resolution to sleep less than you want to.', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/advice'}, {'text': "I do a lot of sports. So at least once a day I try to train. So I either do swimming or gym and I think that's a must. Do exercise for all entrepreneurs, otherwise your level of energy goes down very fast.", 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEOSWaYXCRY'}, {'text': 'Reasons to lift weights:\n\n1. Boosts metabolism \n2. Builds lean muscle \n3. Enhances mood \n4. Strengthens bones \n5. Improves sleep quality \n\nI have been fit for most of my life playing sports however Iāve never felt better than I do now and I attribute it weightlifting.', 'person': 'Will Ahmed', 'source': 'https://x.com/willahmed/status/1848395494495486153'}, {'text': 'I have an efficient workout. I lift weights twice a week, usually Monday and Tuesday, because I find that I can stall travel until Tuesday at 9:00 a.m. So, two hours Monday, two hours on Tuesday, during which I work out every body part known to man. Then that leaves five days of the week where I get as many cardio days as I can.', 'person': 'Doug Leone', 'source': 'https://www.brunswickgroup.com/sequoia-capital-doug-leone-silicon-valley-i11786/'}, {'text': 'Also, staying in shape is critical. I wake up at 4:30 a.m. to work out. Itās a commitment to have your mind and body as healthy as possible so you are ready to attack the problems of the day.', 'person': 'Doug Leone', 'source': 'https://articles.sequoiacap.com/2018-06-20-doug-leone'}, {'text': "If you want to get more serious about it, David Sinclair's podcasts and stuff are good to listen to. A Harvard professor who is into longevity and he has kind of a thing of resveratrol, vitamin K, vitamin D, NMN, and Metformin as sort of like a combination regime and the guy looks pretty young. He's got the science and so on behind it, and he's got the dosages or whatever there. If you want to listen to him, you can do that. None of that stuff is expensive. Metformin, you might need to get a prescription for, you can get like a pill box and start kind of doing that. That's like a V1 longevity stack. Longevity stuff is going to get bigger and bigger.", 'person': 'Balaji Srinivasan', 'source': 'https://www.joincolossus.com/episodes/85214124/srinivasan-optimizing-your-inputs?tab=transcript'}, {'text': "The intermittent fasting stuff is talked about, but it's not very precise often. When you fast, how do you fast. OMAD is something that a lot of tech people are doing now that is, I think very effective where it's what it sounds, like one meal a day. Basically the simplest version is you have a one hour or two hour window where you can eat in that window. You can basically eat whatever you want and you should eat healthy food, but you can basically eat what you want and you just don't eat outside that. Some people do dinner 6:00 to 8:00 PM so they can eat with their family and that's it. Basically, it's very easy to remember. It's essentially like a significant calorie restrictions because as long as you just don't eat at other times you can get in the habit of not eating at other times, it's kind of hard to eat a full day in one meal. The satiety kicks in. It's like 50% or more drop in calories. You start just dropping weight. It's also simpler because you just have fewer dishes to do and all that type of stuff. Right? The other way you can do it is like lunch 12:00 to 1:00 PM, whatever you want. Then you drink coffee or water, or you can have flavorless water or Vitamin Zero or something like that over the day, that kind of stuff. You can track your blood glucose and make sure that things are getting back to normal. That's like intermittent fasting and diet.", 'person': 'Balaji Srinivasan', 'source': 'https://www.joincolossus.com/episodes/85214124/srinivasan-optimizing-your-inputs?tab=transcript'}, {'text': "Number two, if you're interested in health, there's a few things that I think are producing pretty darn good results now among like the tech crew, whether it's a Fitbit or an Apple Watch or a Whoop or an Aura or something like that.", 'person': 'Balaji Srinivasan', 'source': 'https://www.joincolossus.com/episodes/85214124/srinivasan-optimizing-your-inputs?tab=transcript'}, {'text': 'The oxygen mask rule: āyou canāt help your company if youāre not able to perform at your best. Create routines to stay physically, emotionally, and mentally fit. Take vacations.', 'person': 'Jean-Charles Samuelian', 'source': 'https://medium.com/@jcsamuelian'}, {'text': "'Heās built like a tank,' she said. 'He has a level of stamina and an ability to deal with levels of stress that Iāve never seen in anyone else.'", 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-SpaceX-Fantastic-Future/dp/006230125X'}, {'text': "The soldier's health must come before economy or any other consideration.", 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'Breakfasted with Napoleon in the garden. Had a long medical argument with him, in which he maintained that his practice in case of malady - to eat nothing, drink plenty of barley water and no wine and ride for seven or eight leagues to promote perspiration - was much better than mine.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'But my Excel model for weight lifting is beautiful because theyāre numbers that go up and to the right, and itās really fun to play around with that.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://conversationswithtyler.com/episodes/sam-altman/'}, {'text': 'Exercise is probably the second most important physical factor. I tried a number of different exercise programs for a few months each and the one that seemed best was lifting heavy weights 3x a week for an hour, and high intensity interval training occasionally. In addition to productivity gains, this is also the exercise program that makes me feel the best overall.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/productivity'}], 'people': ['Balaji Srinivasan', 'Doug Leone', 'Elon Musk', 'Jean-Charles Samuelian', 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'Napoleon', 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'Sam Altman', 'Will Ahmed'], 'sources': ['https://articles.sequoiacap.com/2018-06-20-doug-leone', 'https://blog.samaltman.com/productivity', 'https://conversationswithtyler.com/episodes/sam-altman/', 'https://medium.com/@jcsamuelian', 'https://nabeelqu.co/advice', 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-SpaceX-Fantastic-Future/dp/006230125X', 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230', 'https://www.brunswickgroup.com/sequoia-capital-doug-leone-silicon-valley-i11786/', 'https://www.joincolossus.com/episodes/85214124/srinivasan-optimizing-your-inputs?tab=transcript', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LEOSWaYXCRY', 'https://x.com/willahmed/status/1848395494495486153']}
{'name': 'Planning & strategy šŗļø ', 'count': 78, 'people_count': 13, 'sources_count': 18, 'quotes': [{'text': 'Do a review of your year, every year, write it out, figure out what was good and what was bad, use this to make your goals for the next year.', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'Do a weekly review. Every Sunday, sit down for an hour with a text editor and review your week. What went well, what went poorly, and what youāre aiming for in the next coming week. I find this is a useful way to force myself to get out of ādoing modeā and into āreflection modeā, and often surfaces useful insights / things that I could be improving about my life. This goes into my plan for the next week, which sets off a set of slowly compounding improvements.', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/advice'}, {'text': 'A few extremely well-chosen objectives impart a clear message about what we say āyesā to and what we say ānoā to.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What is the purpose of MBO?] MBO is designed to provide feedback relevant to the specific task at hand, telling us how we are doing so we can make adjustments if needed.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': 'A successful MBO system needs only to answer two questions: Where do I want to go? (The objective.) How will I pace myself to see if I am getting there? (The key results.)', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[How often should objectives be set in an MBO system?] An MBO system should set objectives for a relatively short period, such as quarterly or monthly.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[Why is clarity important in planning?] If you donāt know where youāre going, you will not get there.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What is the key benefit of MBO?] The one thing an MBO system should provide par excellence is focus.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What is an example of an objective and key results?] I want to go to the airport to catch a plane in an hour. That is my objective. My key results become reaching towns A, B, and C in 10, 20, and 30 minutes respectively.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[Why is focus crucial in planning?] If we try to focus on everything, we focus on nothing.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': 'Management by objectivesāMBOāconcentrates on steps 2 and 3 of the planning process and tries very hard to make them specific.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What is required for effective resource allocation?] People who plan must have the guts, honesty, and discipline to drop projects as well as to initiate them, to say ānoā as well as to say āyes.ā', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[How often should planning occur?] We should avoid planning too frequently, allowing time to judge the impact of our decisions and to gather indispensable feedback for the next planning cycle.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What is the purpose of a plan?] The output of the planning process is the decisions made and the actions taken as a result of the process.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': "[What is planning's role in management?] Planning is a key managerial activity with enormous leverage through its impact on the future performance of an organization.", 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What should planners remember about commitments?] By saying āyesā to something, you are implicitly saying ānoā to something else.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What is the true output of the planning process?] The true output of the planning process is the set of tasks it causes to be implemented.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[Who should be involved in planning?] The operating management of the organization, because planners cannot be separate from those implementing the plan.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[How far ahead should planners look?] At Intel, we examine our future five years off, but the real influence is on the next yearāand only the next year.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[How should gaps in performance be addressed?] Todayās gap represents a failure of planning sometime in the past. Concentrate on what you have to do today to solveāor better, avoidātomorrowās problem.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What is the key to effective planning?] The key to planning is producing tasks that have to be performed now in order to affect future events.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[How strategies and tactics differ by level] A strategy at one managerial level is often the tactical concern of the next higher level.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[About analyzing demand over time] Focus on the difference between what your environment demands from you now and what you expect it to demand in the future.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[About determining your present status] List your present capabilities and projects in progress using the same terms or ācurrencyā in which you stated demand.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[About evaluating your environment] You should determine your customersā expectations and their perception of your performance, keep abreast of technological developments, and evaluate the performance of your vendors and other relevant groups.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[How to close the gap between demand and output] Undertake new tasks or modify existing ones to close the gap between your environmental demand and what your present activities will yield.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[Why not consider practical steps early?] Considering practical steps too early can confuse the issue and prevent adequate planning for real demand.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[About accounting for incomplete projects] Factor in a percentage of loss for incomplete or scrapped projects when forecasting your output.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[On defining strategy vs. tactics] The most abstract and general summary of your planned actions is your strategy, while the specific steps youāll take to implement it are your tactics.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[About defining your environment] Your environment is made up of other groups that directly influence what you do, such as customers, vendors, and competitors.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[How should general planning be structured?] Step 1 is to establish projected need or demand: What will the environment demand from you, your business, or your organization?', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What is step 3 in general planning?] Step 3 is to compare and reconcile steps 1 and 2: What more (or less) do you need to do to produce what your environment will demand?', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What is the dynamics of planning?] The dynamics of planning can best be understood by going back to basic production principles, focusing on forecasting demand and building to forecast.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[How to think about your present status in planning?] Put another way, where will your business be if you do nothing different from what you are now doing?', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[What is step 2 in general planning?] Step 2 is to establish your present status: What are you producing now? What will you be producing as your projects in the pipeline are completed?', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': '[How is factory planning summarized?] Step 1, determine the market demand for product; step 2, establish what the factory will produce if no adjustment is made; and step 3, reconcile the projected factory output with the projected market demand by adjusting the production schedule.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': 'Planning is an ordinary everyday activity; itās something all of us do all the time with no fanfare, in both our personal and professional lives.', 'person': 'Andy Grove', 'source': 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management'}, {'text': "And surely, I thought I was coming into Ramp and I was going to apply the best product process, and I had to shift that process entirely because the process was predicated on a B-plus engineering team, and I was faced with an A-plus engineering team. And so my entire ... I had to go back to first principles around how products should be developed and built. So, again, all the advice I'm sharing here, don't just take it and map it and copy paste. Start from the first principles that we're sharing. An example of that is our support team.", 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript'}, {'text': "And ultimately, if your product roadmap doesn't actually hit the goals of the company, then I'm accountable because I've created a system by which I've aligned with each team on why the roadmap is going to hit the goals. And so you essentially need to point back to the leader in that regard.", 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript'}, {'text': "I think that, again, strategy, financial plan, roadmap. I think where we landed on with OKRs were really around more cross-functional things in nature. So, for example, we'll have an OKR around winning a specific market and we'll have OKRs that are cross-functional across different teams.\nBut, again, an OKR is just a method to measure an objective with metrics and you can use them at various levels of granularity. I stay away from them from a product perspective because, again, I want to focus on velocity, which is just output, which is your roadmap, but they're pretty strong at more of the cross-functional side of things as well as the financial side of things.", 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript'}, {'text': 'We\'ve gone through iterations, good and bad, I think. For a period of time at Ramp, we created OKRs with financial goals and quotas to some extent for different teams. And that led to just taking a long time to plan because people were trying to make sure there was the right metric, trying to make sure that it was achievable. And it became very political, very annoying. And largely, our entire R&D team was like, "Look, we\'re just going to execute on the roadmap, screw the OKRs."\nAnd so we moved from quarterly, very expensive quarterly planning, which took one month every three months, so basically 33% of the time was planning, to a biannual one-pager on, these are the company priorities and it\'s much more smooth and much faster. Related to that, though, we have a strong financial plan that we execute on and each row or lever of that financial plan has an owner. Oftentimes it\'s marketing and sales. For anything that\'s product led, it\'s product. So that\'s one contract. And then we have our roadmap, that\'s the second contract.', 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript'}, {'text': "Correct. And now every pod basically spends time writing that doc for themselves. So the pods are basically organized against outcomes, so they should be very clear on their goals and they publish these things out. And then what I typically do is take all these documents and make sure that they're aligned with our high-level product strategy, which is a bit more long-term thinking than the individual pods, and that they are also aligned with our financial strategy, which we can get into. But that's a little bit of how you also create a culture of empowerment where each team is thinking about these things thinking like you. And the more that, as a leader, you make teams think like you, the more leverage you get over time and the more you can start thinking ahead on other ways of operating.", 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript'}, {'text': "Strategy means a lot of different things. In my mind, strategy is about how do we get to our goals? And it's not a roadmap and it's not a vision, it's something right in between that. So the first thing you need to do is align on what are the goals, what do you want to see in the world? Then the hypothesis, why do you think this will work? Figure out why we're uniquely positioned as a company to get after that goal. Figure out the metrics by which you would measure whether we reach that goal and then talk about the initiatives, talk about the risks, and talk about the long-term outcomes.", 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript'}, {'text': "And I think that for us, we've always been, from the start, the spend management platform that helps you spend less. Our strategy ... I share an annual newsletter around what we did and what we're going to do next year. And it's oftentimes pretty spot on in terms of the goals. Again, the goals and the value and the problem and the vision, that's consistent. The specifics, the timing, the quarterly scopes, all these things, yes, it changes, but what you want to avoid is the thrash of people waking up and feeling like they're working at a different company or that leaders are constantly changing their minds. We've been extremely consistent from the start and I think most of the products that we build, most of the code that we written, is in the customer's hands and hasn't been ripped away. And I think that speaks a lot to velocity, too.", 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript'}, {'text': 'As we grew bigger, we started planning for longer time frames. We still plan precisely for a quarter to a year and have longer-term plans. In reality, we try to do it, but it never works because something always comes up, such as resource constraints.', 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZcTLjMTVZ4'}, {'text': "When I started, I didn't think about the next 5 or 10 years. I was just trying to survive as a business. It was simple: we focused on a three-month view, built what we needed in that period, and then moved on to the next three months. We never had long-term planning. We were focused on surviving and building the features and products that people wanted, driven by short-term goals rather than long-term ones.", 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZcTLjMTVZ4'}, {'text': 'I arrived with an urgent timetable for installing an agenda of specific behavioral norms - actions and attitudes - that applied to every single person on our payroll. ', 'person': 'Bill Walsh', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.fr/Score-Takes-Care-Itself-Philosophy/dp/1591843472'}, {'text': 'The only rules are the ones dictated by the laws of physics. Everything else is a recommendation.', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': "Almost everyone's initial plan is broken. If companies stuck to their initial plans, Microsoft would be selling programming languages, and Apple would be selling printed circuit boards. In both cases their customers told them what their business should be-- and they were smart enough to listen. As Richard Feynman said, the imagination of nature is greater than the imagination of man. You'll find more interesting things by looking at the world than you could ever produce just by thinking. This principle is very powerful. It's why the best abstract painting still falls short of Leonardo, for example. And it applies to startups too. No idea for a product could ever be so clever as the ones you can discover by smashing a beam of prototypes into a beam of users.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/startuplessons.html'}, {'text': 'Still, Son insists we should keep our eyes fixed on the future, looking 100, 200 or 300 years ahead rather than paying too much attention to the passing obsessions of national politicians. āAre all of these decisions taken to protect minuscule interests bound by geography with a small-scale sense of justice and a short-term mindset really for the greater good of humanity?ā he asks. āWhenever you think youāve lost your way, look far off into the future.', 'person': 'Masayoshi Son', 'source': 'https://www.ft.com/content/81ca2462-0f65-4881-a4ff-8dd2dc711a49'}, {'text': 'At the age of 19, Son wrote a 50-year life plan to build a business empire. Now 45 years later, aged 64, he still regiments his life, dividing his daily diary into five-minute blocks. So hard did he work as a young man in the US that he twice turned up late for his own wedding. In Inoueās telling, we learn that Son is: āRound of face, baby-faced even. Friendly of expression. Short of stature. Completely boundless in energy. Occasionally explosive of temperament', 'person': 'Masayoshi Son', 'source': 'https://www.ft.com/content/81ca2462-0f65-4881-a4ff-8dd2dc711a49'}, {'text': 'Musk also trained employees to make the right trade-offs between spending money and productivityā¦ āHe would say that everything we did was a function of our burn rate and that we were burning through a hundred thousand dollars per dayā¦ Sometimes he wouldnāt let you buy a part for two thousand dollars because he expected you to find it cheaper or invent something cheaper. Other times, he wouldnāt flinch at renting a plane for ninety thousand dollars to get something to Kwaj because it saved an entire workday, so it was worth it. He would place this urgency that he expected the revenue in ten years to be ten million dollars a day and that every day we were slower to achieve our goals was a day of missing out on that money.ā', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-SpaceX-Fantastic-Future/dp/006230125X'}, {'text': 'What Musk would not tolerate were excuses or the lack of a clear plan of attack. Hollman was one of many engineers who arrived at this realization after facing one of Muskās trademark grillings. āThe worst call was the first one, ā Hollman said. āSomething had gone wrong, and Elon asked me how long it would take to be operational again, and I didnāt have an immediate answer. He said, āYou need to. This is important to the company. Everything is riding on this. Why donāt you have an answer?ā He kept hitting me with pointed, direct questions. I thought it was more important to let him know quickly what happened, but I learned it was more important to have all the information.ā', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-SpaceX-Fantastic-Future/dp/006230125X'}, {'text': 'The very first thing I do when I get up, almost always, is to sit down and work on that problem [Iāve set the day before] because thatās when Iām freshest. Iām not distracted by phone calls and responses to things, and so forth. Itās the most tabula rasaāblank slateāmoment that I have. I use that to maximize my creativity on a particular project. Iāll usually do it before I shower, because frequently, if I go into the shower, Iāll continue to think about it.', 'person': 'Reid Hoffman', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Tools-Titans-Billionaires-World-Class-Performers/dp/1328683788'}, {'text': 'I have come to learn that part of the business strategy is to solve the simplest, easiest, and most valuable problem. And actually, in fact, part of doing strategy is to solve the easiest problem, so part of the reason why you work on software and bits is that atoms [physical products] are actually very difficult.', 'person': 'Reid Hoffman', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Tools-Titans-Billionaires-World-Class-Performers/dp/1328683788'}, {'text': "This technique can be generalized to any sort of work: if you're an outsider, don't be ruled by plans. Planning is often just a weakness forced on those who delegate.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/marginal.html'}, {'text': 'One [checklist] I review weekly with medium-to-long-term things Iām thinking about. (Lots of Stripe things, friends, skills I want to learn, people I want to meet, topics I want to learn about, health-related stuff, &c.) Helps a lot with keeping myself primed. Start a new version every year... Itās just a Google Doc: Area, Goal, & Next step. Goals without next steps then stick out (thatās part of where priming comes inā¦). I update the next steps at least weekly, as part of review. I move completed goals to bottomāfeels good, plus fun end-of-year review.', 'person': 'Patrick Collison', 'source': 'https://twitter.com/patrickc/status/1081017433501052928'}, {'text': 'Yeah, weāre basically all about inputs. Itās basically process versus outcome. And itās exactly for the reason you said. Venture capital is too elongated an activity. We donāt really know whether something is going to work or not work in the first five years of its life after we passed. And so itās ā okay, what do I learn? Like, what, what do I learn in the first three years when itās not working? Because sometimes these companies really struggle for a while and then they really succeed. Sometimes itās the opposite ā they really succeed fast and then they have serious issues later... \n\nYeah, and so we really donāt spend a huge amount of time on that. What weāve zeroed in on is ā whatās the optimal way to run the process? Whatās the optimal way to run the firm? Whatās the optimal way to help the entrepreneur? By the way, the optimal way to help is not too much help. The optimal way is to make sure we understand whatās happening in the industry, whatās the best way to help with our network, the optimal way to help the management teams. Itās all a process.', 'person': 'Marc Andreessen', 'source': 'https://a16z.com/marc-andreessen-on-productivity-scheduling-reading-habits-work-and-more/'}, {'text': 'One, about every six months or so I feel overwhelmed. It all starts to kind of get away from me. And so typically about every six months, Iāll basically sit down and do a come-to-Jesus with myself. Which is āOkay, youāve got this great system, but itās becoming overloadedā. And āyouāre saying yes to too many things and are involved in too many thingsā. You really have to uplevel and figure out whatās important. I usually take a good hour to look at what Iāve been doing. Itās basically figuring out the threshold for āyesā versus ānoā. I try to revise that about once a year. Also about once a year, I rewrite my personal plan. I just write from scratch what Iām actually trying to do and my goals and then line up the activities that are below that. I would say a couple things about time allocation. One, itās not spreadsheet driven. You read about these executives/CEOs having this very complex exercise and they use a spreadsheet for their calendarā¦', 'person': 'Marc Andreessen', 'source': 'https://a16z.com/marc-andreessen-on-productivity-scheduling-reading-habits-work-and-more/'}, {'text': 'The head of an army must calculate the needs of all his generals on the basis of their positions and circumstances and not let their requests determine his decisions.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'In order to know whether his administration is good or bad, whether his laws are in harmony with custom, my son should ask for a yearly report on the number of sentences passed by the tribunals, together with their motivations. If crimes and misdemeanors increase, this is proof that misery is on the rise and that society is badly governed. Their decrease is proof of the contrary.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'Men take only their needs into consideration - never their abilities.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'This is how the smallest events change the destinies of the world. The mistakes of our enemies often are more useful to them than their abilities and cause us to commit mistakes still greater than theirs.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'In planning the Moravian campaign, the Emperor understood that the Russians, since they lacked a first rate general, would think that the line of retreat of the French army was anchored on Vienna. Consequently, they had to attach great importance to cutting the Vienna road, whereas in fact, throughout the whole Moravian campaign, the French line of retreat was never intended to bear on Vienna. This single circumstance falsified all the enemyās calculations and was bound to make him decide on movements which led to his annihilation.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'I always have loved to analyse, and if I ever fell seriously in love I would take my love apart piece by piece. ', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'There is no man more pusillanimous than I when I am planning a campaign. I purposely exaggerate all the dangers and all the calamities that the circumstances make possible. I am in a thoroughly painful state of agitation. This does not keep me from looking quite serene in front of my entourage; I am like an unmarried girl laboring with a child. Once I have made up my mind, everything is forgotten except what leads to success.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'My policies are frank and open, because they are the results of long meditations and of strength.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'A consecutive series of great actions never is the result of chance and luck; it is always the product of planning and genius. Great men are rarely known to fail in their most perilous enterprisesā¦ is it because they are lucky that they become great? No, but being great, they have been able to master luck. ', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'In war nothing can be gained except by calculation. Whatever has not been profoundly meditated in all its details is totally ineffectual. ', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'If I appear always ready to answer for everything and to meet everything, itās because, before entering on an undertaking, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. Itās not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or do in a circumstance unexpected by other people: it is reflection, meditation.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'Military science consists in first calculating all the possibilities accurately and then in making an almost mathematically exact allowance for accident. It is on this point that one must make no mistake; a decimal more or less may alter everything. Now, this apportioning of knowledge and accident can take place only in the head of a genius, for without it there can be no creation - and surely the greatest improvisation of the human mind is that which gives existence to the nonexistent. Accident thus always remains a mystery to mediocre minds and becomes reality for superior men.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'Thereās a man for you! He is forced to flee from an army that he dares not fight, but he puts eighty leagues of devastation between himself and his pursuers. He slows down the march of the pursuing army, he weakens it by all kinds of privation - he knows how to ruin it without fighting it.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'The great art of winning a battle consists in changing oneās line of operations in the middle of the action. This idea is entirely my own and altogether new. Itās what made me win at Marengo; the enemy attached my line of operations in order to cut it, but I had changed it and so he himself was cut in two.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'But strategy alone has no valueāvalue gets captured by execution.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/value-is-created-by-doing'}, {'text': 'One specific thing I do, which is sort of become this annual ritual I really like, is December 31st every year I take a break from vacation and I sit and I write down what went well the last year, what didnāt. I look at like how I did on my to-do list for the year, and I write the one out for the next year. Because I know Iām going to do that every year, I stress about it less the other 364 days. The fundamental pattern that has always worked for me is take time, explore a lot of things, try a lot of things, try to have a beginnerās mind about what will work and what wonāt work. But trust your intuitions, pursue a lot of things as cheaply and quickly as possible. Then be very honest with yourself about whatās working well and whatās not.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://www.ycombinator.com/blog/sam-altman-on-choosing-projects-creating-value-and-finding-purpose/'}, {'text': 'Have clear goals for yourself every day, every year, and every decade.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/the-days-are-long-but-the-decades-are-short'}, {'text': 'I had few really definite ideas, and the reason for this was that, instead of obstinately seeking to control circumstances, I obeyed them, and they forced me to change my mind all the time. Thus it happened that most of the time, to tell the truth, I had no definite plans but only projects. ', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'In order to govern, the question is not to follow out a more or less valid theory but to build with whatever materials are at hand. The inevitable must be accepted and turned to advantage.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}], 'people': ['Andy Grove', 'Bill Walsh', 'Elon Musk', 'Geoff Charles', 'Marc Andreessen', 'Masayoshi Son', 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'Napoleon', 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'Patrick Collison', 'Paul Graham', 'Reid Hoffman', 'Sam Altman'], 'sources': ['http://www.paulgraham.com/marginal.html', 'http://www.paulgraham.com/startuplessons.html', 'https://a16z.com/marc-andreessen-on-productivity-scheduling-reading-habits-work-and-more/', 'https://blog.samaltman.com/the-days-are-long-but-the-decades-are-short', 'https://blog.samaltman.com/value-is-created-by-doing', 'https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Output_Management', 'https://nabeelqu.co/advice', 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles', 'https://twitter.com/patrickc/status/1081017433501052928', 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-SpaceX-Fantastic-Future/dp/006230125X', 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281', 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230', 'https://www.amazon.com/Tools-Titans-Billionaires-World-Class-Performers/dp/1328683788', 'https://www.amazon.fr/Score-Takes-Care-Itself-Philosophy/dp/1591843472', 'https://www.ft.com/content/81ca2462-0f65-4881-a4ff-8dd2dc711a49', 'https://www.lennysnewsletter.com/p/velocity-over-everything-how-ramp#transcript', 'https://www.ycombinator.com/blog/sam-altman-on-choosing-projects-creating-value-and-finding-purpose/', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZcTLjMTVZ4']}
{'name': 'Principles š', 'count': 1, 'people_count': 1, 'sources_count': 1, 'quotes': [{'text': '- try to develop your own principles. the physics of technology totally changed. nobody truly understands how AI has changed the game yetāyou can lead!', 'person': 'Alexandr Wang', 'source': 'https://twitter.com/alexandr_wang/status/1637638523066150912?s=20'}], 'people': ['Alexandr Wang'], 'sources': ['https://twitter.com/alexandr_wang/status/1637638523066150912?s=20']}
{'name': 'Prioritizing šµ\u200dš«', 'count': 16, 'people_count': 6, 'sources_count': 11, 'quotes': [{'text': 'Figure out what your primary focus is and make progress on that every day, first thing in the morning, no exceptions. Days with 0 output are the killers.', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'I would say 12 months. I donāt do my best every secondāwho does?ābut I try to bring my best every day. Even then, you might have a day or a week where you donāt bring it, so I try to look at the bigger picture. Itās not every second or every hour that matters. It needs to be more strategic than that.\xa0With a year, youāve got to have a general direction where youāre going.\xa0It has an element of strategy, an aim and a goal. Then itās execution. It gives you enough time to be right and to be wrong.', 'person': 'Doug Leone', 'source': 'https://articles.sequoiacap.com/2018-06-20-doug-leone'}, {'text': 'I think it depends on your age. In my 20s, I never really had a five-year plan. I prioritized pursuing new opportunities more than imagining where Iād end up.\xa0When youāre younger, I think three years is a good period of time to consider.\xa0Itās short enough to feel real, but long enough that you can make meaningful progress and big changes. As you get older, though, five or ten years starts to make more sense.', 'person': 'Roelof Botha', 'source': 'https://articles.sequoiacap.com/2018-07-11-roelof-botha'}, {'text': 'Iām wrong all the time; as Yoda says in\xa0The Last JediāāThe greatest teacher, failure is.ā\xa0When I realize Iām wrong about an investment decision, for example, I try to learn not only from the things I missed at the time, but also from what I didnāt anticipate.\xa0What ended up happening that I failed to imagine? Once youāve made up your mind, itās difficult to go back and revisit those preconceived ideas. But thatās how you avoid the same traps next time.', 'person': 'Roelof Botha', 'source': 'https://articles.sequoiacap.com/2018-07-11-roelof-botha'}, {'text': 'Everything!\xa0My fantasy is omniscience. I used to watch Groundhog Day and daydream that if I were stuck in a time loop, Iād go back to university and read every book in the library. Itās not just about knowing things, itās about deep understanding. To gain true insight, you have to peel back the layers of something and understand it fundamentally, at its core.', 'person': 'Roelof Botha', 'source': 'https://articles.sequoiacap.com/2018-07-11-roelof-botha'}, {'text': "I frequently reassess my routines and ask myself, 'Am I accomplishing what I want to accomplish?'\xa0That means taking the time to think about what really makes me happy, and then setting specific goals. When I was in high school, I wrote my goals on two signsāI put one on the wall above my desk, and one on the inside of my door. When I got tired of studying, Iād look up and see my goals on the wall, put my head down, and keep going. If I got up anyway, Iād see my goals on the door and go back to my desk. It didnāt always workāsometimes you just need a break. But that system helped me remember what I was working toward.", 'person': 'Roelof Botha', 'source': 'https://articles.sequoiacap.com/2018-07-11-roelof-botha'}, {'text': '[When starting a company] You need to address an authentic, personal problem, not just manufacture an idea because you think thereās a market opportunity. Square is a great example. One of the founders, Jim McKelvey, is an engineer, but heās also an artistāa glassblower. He once lost a sale at his studio because he couldnāt process the transaction. That was the inspiration for Square. When youāve personally faced the problem youāre solving and you understand it on a visceral level, youāre much better prepared to address the specific challenges of building your company.', 'person': 'Roelof Botha', 'source': 'https://articles.sequoiacap.com/2018-07-11-roelof-botha'}, {'text': 'Friends come and go; enemies accumulate. At Sequoia, we meet with thousands of companies every year, and only partner with 15-20. Thatās thousands of interactions where we run the risk of making a negative impression. Regardless of whether we end up partnering with them, we always want founders to know we respect them and their ideas.\xa0Iām mindful of how I treat people and I think about the long-term consequences of my interactions.\xa0The people we meet with will tell others about their experience, good or bad.', 'person': 'Roelof Botha', 'source': 'https://articles.sequoiacap.com/2018-07-11-roelof-botha'}, {'text': "Unfortunately the trick to great execution is to say no a lot. Youāre saying no ninety-seven times out of a hundred, and most founders find they have to make a very conscious effort to do this. Most startups are nowhere near focused enough.\xa0They work really hard-maybe-but they donāt work really hard at the right things, so they'll still fail. One of the great and terrible things about starting a start up is that you get no credit for trying.\xa0You only get points when you make something the market wants. So if you work really hard on the wrong things, no one will care.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': 'What you focus on is what you improve. Most founders donāt build great products because they focus on things that arenāt important like investors, hiring, pitch decks, tweeting, press, their peers, etc. The best founders focus on their customers, their product, and their health. Itās easier to raise money, hang with startup investors, hire employees, sling decks, tweet, get on a Forbes list, and brag to your friends than it is to build a good product. Donāt let fear convince you to focus on whatās easy. Embrace the hard task of caring for your users and you maximize your chances of success. Understand that 90%+ of founders around you wonāt follow this advice. Act like the average startup founder - get the average result. At YC our core goal is to help you strive for excellence and accomplish an extraordinary outcome.', 'person': 'Michael Seibel', 'source': 'https://x.com/mwseibel/status/1677734511919140864?s=46&t=qgopL_Y6F84neSIfv-BoPA'}, {'text': "In summary, I claim that some of the reasons why so many people who have greatness within their grasp don't succeed are:\xa0they don't work on important problems,\xa0they don't become emotionally involved,\xa0they don't try and change what is difficult to some other situation which is easily done but is still important, and they keep giving themselves alibis why they don't, they keep saying that it is a matter of luck.\xa0", 'person': 'Richard Hamming', 'source': 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html'}, {'text': 'there are a lot of things you want to do that you are never going to get done. embracing that is the key to accomplishing the things you *really* want to do.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://twitter.com/sama/status/1663945432752332800?s=20'}, {'text': 'there are a lot of things you want to do that you are never going to get done. embracing that is the key to accomplishing the things you *really* want to do.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://twitter.com/sama/status/1663945432752332800'}, {'text': 'Focus intensely on the things that do matter. Every day, figure out what the 2 or 3 most important things for you to do are. Do those and ignore other distractions. Be a relentless execution machine.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/startup-advice-briefly'}, {'text': 'The founders that are really successful are relentless about making sure they get to their top two or three priorities each day (as part of this, they figure out what the right priorities are), and ignoring other items.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/super-successful-companies'}, {'text': 'I am relentless about getting my most important projects doneāIāve found that if I really want something to happen and I push hard enough, it usually happens.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/productivity'}], 'people': ['Doug Leone', 'Michael Seibel', 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'Richard Hamming', 'Roelof Botha', 'Sam Altman'], 'sources': ['https://articles.sequoiacap.com/2018-06-20-doug-leone', 'https://articles.sequoiacap.com/2018-07-11-roelof-botha', 'https://blog.samaltman.com/productivity', 'https://blog.samaltman.com/startup-advice-briefly', 'https://blog.samaltman.com/super-successful-companies', 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles', 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/', 'https://twitter.com/sama/status/1663945432752332800', 'https://twitter.com/sama/status/1663945432752332800?s=20', 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html', 'https://x.com/mwseibel/status/1677734511919140864?s=46&t=qgopL_Y6F84neSIfv-BoPA']}
{'name': 'Product š»', 'count': 6, 'people_count': 4, 'sources_count': 4, 'quotes': [{'text': "[On additional features causing product complexity] Solve this problem through interface design. The interface should be super simpleāshow the right product at the right time. Think about a car: it has a lot of functionality but is simple to use. You drive where you want, play music when you want. The same applies to banking products. If you position everything simply, there's no problem.", 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXubBqd8uXs'}, {'text': "To win in the market, you need to be product strategy-driven, not sales or marketing-driven. You need to believe that the product strategy will deliver value to the customer and that in turn drives value to the business. That belief is earned and needs to start early in the companyās lifecycle.'", 'person': 'Geoff Charles', 'source': 'https://ramp.com/blog/how-we-build-product-at-ramp'}, {'text': 'The best possible roadmap is have a very clear guide view of what matters to your merchant, have a super strong model of your own capabilities as a company. And then we run the function of deciding what is the very best thing you can work on. Every moment, you have teams ready to pick the next task instead of everyone of doggedly working off a thing that, of course, gets interrupted by reality.', 'person': 'Tobi LĆ¼tke', 'source': 'https://jcnews.substack.com/p/scaling-innovation-tips-from-uber'}, {'text': 'If your product seems finished, there are two possible explanations: (a) it is finished, or (b) you lack imagination. Experience suggests (b) is a thousand times more likely.', 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/startuplessons.html'}, {'text': "I think the solution is to assume that anything you've made is far short of what it could be. Force yourself, as a sort of intellectual exercise, to keep thinking of improvements. Ok, sure, what you have is perfect. But if you had to change something, what would it be?", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/startuplessons.html'}, {'text': "Perhaps the most important reason to release early, though, is that it makes you work harder. When you're working on something that isn't released, problems are intriguing. In something that's out there, problems are alarming. There is a lot more urgency once you release. And I think that's precisely why people put it off. They know they'll have to work a lot harder once they do.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/startuplessons.html'}], 'people': ['Geoff Charles', 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'Paul Graham', 'Tobi LĆ¼tke'], 'sources': ['http://www.paulgraham.com/startuplessons.html', 'https://jcnews.substack.com/p/scaling-innovation-tips-from-uber', 'https://ramp.com/blog/how-we-build-product-at-ramp', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXubBqd8uXs']}
{'name': 'Productivity š§', 'count': 128, 'people_count': 22, 'sources_count': 40, 'quotes': [{'text': 'Maximize your baseline energy levels. There is the obvious stuff: figure out a personal exercise practice and do it at least five days a week (I like running). If you donāt, youāre just leaving a bunch of power on the table.', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/advice'}, {'text': "[On what makes Sequoia so successful] I think it's grit, persistence, tenacity, determination, never/refusing to give up, not tolerating low performers, insistence on team, very simple goals, and showing up for work every day--which, in the venture business, gives you a competitive advantage. A profound competitive advantage.", 'person': 'Michael Moritz', 'source': 'https://aletteraday.substack.com/p/letter-134-michael-moritz-and-robert'}, {'text': "So then there's this question of how do you figure out what to focus on each day. Each day it's really important to have goals. Most good founders I know have a set of small overarching goals for the company that everybody in the company knows. You know it could be something like ship a product by this date, get this certain growth rate, get this engagement rate, hire for these key roles, those are some of them but everyone in the company can tell you each week what are our key goals. And then everybody executes based off of that.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': 'Writing is a design problem.\xa0Example: never use the idiom of āthe former or the latter.ā It forces the reader to go back and figure out what youāre referring to.', 'person': 'Naval Ravikant', 'source': 'https://venturehacks.com/writing'}, {'text': 'Break the rules once you learn the rules.\xa0Write in your authentic voice. Tell a story. Use adjectives.\xa0Write poetry. Learn which\xa0word choices\xa0unlock action. But first learn how to write clearly and concisely.', 'person': 'Naval Ravikant', 'source': 'https://venturehacks.com/writing'}, {'text': 'Skim\xa0Strunk & White\xa0once in a while.\xa0You donāt need to read the whole book at once. Also read\xa0The Day You Became a Better Writer.', 'person': 'Naval Ravikant', 'source': 'https://venturehacks.com/writing'}, {'text': 'Use persuasion checklists like CLASSR and SUCCES.', 'person': 'Naval Ravikant', 'source': 'https://venturehacks.com/writing'}, {'text': 'Donāt apologize.\xa0Donāt qualify, apologize or anticipate arguments. Just say it. Some people will never understand that\xa0BOCTAOE. You can always put an FAQ at the end.', 'person': 'Naval Ravikant', 'source': 'https://venturehacks.com/writing'}, {'text': 'Kill your darlings.\xa0Delete beautiful ideas and phrases if they donāt help the customer solve their problem.', 'person': 'Naval Ravikant', 'source': 'https://venturehacks.com/writing'}, {'text': 'Scrutinize every word for bias and rhetoric.\xa0Are they an āunruly mobā or āpatriotsā? Perhaps neitherājust call them by their name. Argue the other side of every word, at least to yourself. Learn more about\xa0bias.', 'person': 'Naval Ravikant', 'source': 'https://venturehacks.com/writing'}, {'text': 'Avoid adjectives.\xa0Use numbers instead. An adjective is an admission that you donāt know the number.', 'person': 'Naval Ravikant', 'source': 'https://venturehacks.com/writing'}, {'text': 'Delete half the words.\xa0Say more with less. Thatās good customer service. āIf I had more time, I would have written a shorter letter.ā', 'person': 'Naval Ravikant', 'source': 'https://venturehacks.com/writing'}, {'text': 'Writing is rewriting.\xa0Write down your thoughts in a stream of consciousness. Donāt get hung up on diction. Then spend most of your time rewriting and reorganizingāsweat the details. Iām still rewriting posts days after Iāve published them.', 'person': 'Naval Ravikant', 'source': 'https://venturehacks.com/writing'}, {'text': 'Start with a summary.\xa0A good summary absolves the reader from reading further. But they will still want to.', 'person': 'Naval Ravikant', 'source': 'https://venturehacks.com/writing'}, {'text': 'Donāt write your thought process. The final draft shouldnāt mimic the path you took to come up with the idea. Instead, start the piece with a conclusion and make your best case.', 'person': 'Naval Ravikant', 'source': 'https://venturehacks.com/writing'}, {'text': 'Email it to yourself and read it on your phone.\xa0Youāll see the words with fresh eyes, as if someone else wrote them. This will force you to keep it short and simple.', 'person': 'Naval Ravikant', 'source': 'https://venturehacks.com/writing'}, {'text': 'Sum it up in a tweet.\xa0If the tweet isnāt compelling, the rest isnāt compelling. The ideal tweet absolves the reader from reading further. Sequoia says, āSummarize the companyās business on the back of a business card.ā', 'person': 'Naval Ravikant', 'source': 'https://venturehacks.com/writing'}, {'text': 'Pretend youāre sending an email.\xa0Or a Slack message. It will calm your mind and yield better writing.', 'person': 'Naval Ravikant', 'source': 'https://venturehacks.com/writing'}, {'text': 'Itās good to know the market but the competition is\xa0irrelevant. The market is big. Winning comes by knowing the customer\xa0better, executing better, and continuing to work on the problem after sane people have cashed out.\xa0If a competitor is going to scare you,\xa0you shouldnāt have started a business in the first place. Every big\xa0market or successful business will attract competitors anyway. Always assume competition.', 'person': 'Naval Ravikant', 'source': 'https://venturehacks.com/always-assume-competition'}, {'text': 'At Facebook, there was a time (2005 thru mid-2006) when we hired customer service people at a constant ratio with user growth. When we had 10M users, we had less than 20 people in customer service. As we climbed towards our first 100M users, it was clear we could not just staff this up by 10x, so we charged our internal tools team with working closely with our customer service analysts to build ever more innovative tools and user interfaces to improve the efficiency of our customer service department by orders of magnitude. Today, we have only ~3x more customer service people (i.e. around 60-70), serving well over 325M users. There is no external company, off-the-shelf product, or management consulting strategy that could have yielded an order-of-magnitude gain in personnel effectiveness; it was the work of a small internal tools team that analyzed the work being done and created custom tools to streamline it by automating the parts that a computer could do quickly while optimizing the experience so that the human analyst could concentrate on what humans were best at.', 'person': 'Yishan Wong', 'source': 'http://algeri-wong.com/yishan/engineering-management-tools-are-top-priority.html'}, {'text': 'Hence, your operating efficiency, and thus the number of people you need to hire, and therefore your costs, are directly impacted by the ingenuity of your internal tools. This means that your tools teams should not be a back-office, after-thought function staffed with second-string players. Your most talented engineers should be working on your tools, and your culture must reflect this priority. Writing great tools and continuing to improve and replace them is more important than the next shiny feature.', 'person': 'Yishan Wong', 'source': 'http://algeri-wong.com/yishan/engineering-management-tools-are-top-priority.html'}, {'text': 'spend 10-20% of your time reorienting', 'person': 'Alexey Guzey', 'source': 'https://guzey.com/lifehacks/'}, {'text': 'you decide whether to live in the past or in the future with your every action', 'person': 'Alexey Guzey', 'source': 'https://guzey.com/lifehacks/'}, {'text': 'have a concrete positive vision of the future', 'person': 'Alexey Guzey', 'source': 'https://guzey.com/lifehacks/'}, {'text': 'if youāre not failing youāre not operating at the edge. if youāre not operating at the edge, youāre not learning as much as you can', 'person': 'Alexey Guzey', 'source': 'https://guzey.com/lifehacks/'}, {'text': 'easy to replace systems get replaced by difficult to replace systems', 'person': 'Alexey Guzey', 'source': 'https://guzey.com/lifehacks/'}, {'text': 'get to inbox 0 every day, unless you have a specific reason not to', 'person': 'Alexey Guzey', 'source': 'https://guzey.com/lifehacks/'}, {'text': 'every document must have a specific goal written at the top of it', 'person': 'Alexey Guzey', 'source': 'https://guzey.com/lifehacks/'}, {'text': 'set 5 minute timers and write next steps. set a 5 minute timer and start doing the next step', 'person': 'Alexey Guzey', 'source': 'https://guzey.com/lifehacks/'}, {'text': 'youāll learn 10x more by talking to the paperās author for 30 minutes versus reading it for 30 minutes\n', 'person': 'Alexey Guzey', 'source': 'https://guzey.com/lifehacks/'}, {'text': 'if you did a sequence of actions 3 times, make a checklist\n', 'person': 'Alexey Guzey', 'source': 'https://guzey.com/lifehacks/'}, {'text': 'everything has an MVP & final version. MVP can usually be done in 10% of the time with a timer for 5-10-15 minutes & ensures you donāt get stuck. whatās the mvp of your current top goal?', 'person': 'Alexey Guzey', 'source': 'https://guzey.com/lifehacks/'}, {'text': 'if you donāt have consistent scheduled time for your top goals, you donāt have top goals', 'person': 'Alexey Guzey', 'source': 'https://guzey.com/lifehacks/'}, {'text': 'expectation of progress towards a goal is key to motivation. we are not motivated if donāt know next step. we are not motivated if we donāt know what the goal is.', 'person': 'Alexey Guzey', 'source': 'https://guzey.com/lifehacks/'}, {'text': "I do believe that as a company and as an entrepreneur, you have to want to succeed more than your competitors want you not to. That is hard to teach. Somebody said recently that I'm the most tenacious CEO they've ever seen. I'm not exactly sure whether that's a compliment or not. But my will to survive exceeds almost everybody else's will to kill me. And so, I think that that is probably appropriate.", 'person': 'Jensen Huang', 'source': 'https://ecorner.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2003/01/1125.pdf'}, {'text': 'As human beings it is our right (maybe our moral duty) to reshape the universe to our preferences. Technology, which is really knowledge, enables this. You should probably work on raising the ceiling, not the floor.', 'person': 'Nat Friedman', 'source': 'https://nat.org/'}, {'text': 'The number one mistake people make is thinking too big on their first business. They try to start the next SpaceX when they should be starting a paving company. Something boring that gets you the money to start the next SpaceX later. Build the launch pad before the rocket.', 'person': 'Andrew Wilkinson', 'source': 'https://twitter.com/awilkinson/status/1698772216584999035?s=20'}, {'text': 'Execution certainly matters a great deal. And I think that within your question is, in fact, the fact that having simpler ideas that you can execute perfectly is sometimes better than having a grandiose idea that your company can\'t execute on it. And so, when you get large as a company and when you\'re trying to do complicated things, in fact, it is best, it is most prudent to keep it simple. Many ideas surface and a lot of people say, "Jensen, why don\'t you guys do this? Why don\'t you do this?" Our engineers are asking me, "Why don\'t we put this feature?" We could have done all that. I mean, it wasn\'t because we didn\'t have the ability to have the idea. You have to decide as a company, you have to decide as an engineering team or as an innovator, to say, "You know what? I don\'t need to change the world overnight. I\'m going to change the world over the next 50 years. I don\'t need to build a killer product overnight. I just need to build a winning product." And the goal of winning is so that you can play again. It\'s just like pinball.', 'person': 'Jensen Huang', 'source': 'https://ecorner.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2003/01/1125.pdf'}, {'text': 'Execution is critically important; it is better to have a simple idea that can be easily implemented rather than a complicated idea that has implementation challenges. Drastic changes do not have to be made overnight; it is a long road to success and each change need only take the company to the next step.', 'person': 'Jensen Huang', 'source': 'https://ecorner.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2003/01/1125.pdf'}, {'text': "Enthusiasm matters! It's much easier to work on things that are exciting to you. It might be easier to do big things than small things for this reason. Energy is a necessary input for progress.", 'person': 'Nat Friedman', 'source': 'https://nat.org/'}, {'text': 'You can do more than you think. We are tied down by invisible orthodoxy. The laws of physics are the only limit.', 'person': 'Nat Friedman', 'source': 'https://nat.org/'}, {'text': "If you could just play well enough to get another game, you can be there for a long time. Most companies just need to realize that in fact this is a long road and that you can't build that perfect that perfect product. So, once you do that, that you keep the project scope confined, you keep the project now simple, you have a long-term vision, your product definition is rather simple, you execute flawlessly on that because your people now can execute flawlessly on a simple plan and you come back and do it again.", 'person': 'Jensen Huang', 'source': 'https://ecorner.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2003/01/1125.pdf'}, {'text': 'It\'s important to do things fast. You learn more per unit time because you make contact with reality more frequently. Going fast makes you focus on what\'s important; there\'s no time for bullshit. "Slow is fake". A week is 2% of the year. Time is the denominator.', 'person': 'Nat Friedman', 'source': 'https://nat.org/'}, {'text': "Free startup idea: Pinterest for Knowledge A platform that allows individuals to bookmark the best content they've consumed around the internet. They can categorize these bookmarks by topic. They can also share their bookmarks with people who follow them. Ultimately, I see a world where the best curators of knowledge can monetize their curation. Followers will pay to subscribe to premium curated lists that Pro Curators create & update.", 'person': 'Alex Lieberman', 'source': 'https://twitter.com/businessbarista/status/1681060236482715648'}, {'text': "I would encourage people to read broadly in many different subject areas, and then try to find something where there's an overlap of your talents and what you're interested in. So people may be good at something, or they may have skill at a particular thing, but they don't like doing it. So you wanna try to find a thing that's a good combination of the things that you're inherently good at, but you also like doing.", 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://youtu.be/DxREm3s1scA?si=vEASaOafIrnKxQQw&t=8494'}, {'text': "I encourage people to read a lot of books, just read, basically try to ingest as much information as you can, and try to also just develop a good general knowledge. So you at least have a rough lay of the land of the knowledge landscape, try to learn a little about a lot of things. How would you know what you're really interested in if you at least aren't like doing it? Peripheral exploration broadly of the knowledge landscape. And talk to people from different walks of life and different industries, and professions, and skills, and occupations, like just try. Learn as much as possible. Be on the search for meaning", 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://youtu.be/DxREm3s1scA?si=Df23C3FUb_N-Hl0L&t=8433'}, {'text': 'Like I said, I would encourage people to use the mental tools of physics and apply them broadly in life. They are the best tools.', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://youtu.be/DxREm3s1scA?si=RfBMil7fRIQHWLzy&t=8379'}, {'text': "Try to be useful. Do things that are useful to your fellow human beings, to the world. It's very hard to be useful. Very hard. Are you contributing more than you consume? Try to have a positive net contribution to society. I think that's the thing to aim for. Not to try to be sort of a leader for the sake of being a leader or whatever. A lot of the time people who, a lot of times the people you want as leaders, are the people who don't want to be leaders. If you're living a useful life, that is a good life, a life worth having lived.", 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://youtu.be/DxREm3s1scA?si=CJ_Eq2z4c02irjds&t=8319'}, {'text': 'So what will often happen in trying to design a product is people will start with the tools and parts and methods that they are familiar with, and try to create a product using their existing tools and methods. The other way to think about it is actually imagine the, try to imagine the platonic ideal of the perfect product or technology, whatever it might be, and say, What is this? What is the perfect arrangement of atoms that would be the best possible product? And now let us try to figure out how to get the atoms in that shape.', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://youtu.be/DxREm3s1scA?si=aj7xO8VEqtdGnFEA&t=1500'}, {'text': "Like a good example of thinking about things in the limit is if you take any product, any machine or whatever, like take a rocket or whatever, and say, if you've got, if you look at the raw materials in the rocket, so you're gonna have like aluminum, steel, titanium, Inconel, specialty alloys, copper. And you say, 'What's the weight of the constituent elements of each of these elements, and what is their raw material value?' And that sets the asymptotic limit for how low the cost of the vehicle can be, unless you change the materials. And then when you do that, I call it like maybe the magic one number or something like that. So that would be like, if you had the, just a pile of these raw materials here, and you could wave a magic wand and rearrange the atoms into the final shape, that would be the lowest possible cost that you could make this thing for, unless you change the materials. So then, and that is always, almost always a very low number. So then, what's actually causing things to be expensive is how you put the atoms into the desired shape.", 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://youtu.be/DxREm3s1scA?si=M_H288JxviwG4GWy&t=1301'}, {'text': "And then another good physics tool is thinking about things in the limit. If you take a particular thing and you scale it to a very large number or to a very small number, how do things change? Both in number of things you manufacture, something like that, and then in time. Yeah, let's say, take an example of manufacturing, which I think is just a very underrated problem. Like I said, it's much harder to take an advanced technology part and bring it into volume manufacturing, than it is to design it in the first place. More is magnitude. So let's say you're trying to figure out, why is this part or product expensive? Is it because of something fundamentally foolish that we're doing? Or is it because our volume is too low? And so then you say, okay, well what if our volume was a million units a year? Is it still expensive? That's what I'm radical, thinking about things to the limit. If it's too expensive at a million units a year, then volume is not the reason why your thing is expensive. There's something fundamental about the design. And then you then can focus on the reducing complexity or something like that in the design. Gotta change the design to, change the part to be something that is not fundamentally expensive.", 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://youtu.be/DxREm3s1scA?si=TB1aNc0R6VFmcc5G&t=1169'}, {'text': "Saying like, physics is law and everything else was a recommendation. I've met a lot of people that can break the law, but I have never met anyone who could break physics. So first for any kind of technology problem you have to sort of just make sure you're not violating physics. First principles analysis, I think, is something that can be applied to really any walk of life, anything really. It's really just saying, let's boil something down to the most fundamental principles, the things that we are most confident are true at a foundational level, and that sets your axiomatic base, and then you reason up from there. And then you cross check your conclusion against the axiomatic truth. Some basics in physics would be like are violating conservation of energy or momentum or something like that, then it's not gonna work.", 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://youtu.be/DxREm3s1scA?si=YiLZ3XwsNGEpJx06&t=1097'}, {'text': "I mean, for me, it's simply this is something that is important to get done and we should just keep doing it or die trying. And I don't need a source of strength. So quitting is not even like... It's not, it's not in my nature. And I don't care about optimism or pessimism. Fuck that, we're gonna get it done.\t\thttps://youtu.be/DxREm3s1scA?si=8eZvBW_xFFq4PjSm&t=1043\tElon Musk", 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://youtu.be/DxREm3s1scA?si=8eZvBW_xFFq4PjSm&t=1043'}, {'text': 'If you feel behind focus on movement, not blame. Everything takes up energy. Choose wisely.', 'person': 'Amanda Goetz', 'source': 'https://twitter.com/AmandaMGoetz/status/1696190864119279969?s=20'}, {'text': 'The ātwo doā list has changed my life. Most people create a 30 point to-do list and then what? They do the easiest thing first and NEVER get to the hard stuff. So whatās the ātwo-doā list? Every night before bed I select 2 bug things to get done the next morning. It usually takes <2 hours. Todayās two-dos: Draft newsletter. Pull out all business expenses from my credit card statements. Now I get to go enjoy my day knowing Iāve focused and finished on two projects most would put off until the last minute. Planning and focus reduces procrastination and stress.', 'person': 'Amanda Goetz', 'source': 'https://twitter.com/AmandaMGoetz/status/1698345143483396519?s=20'}, {'text': 'The content no productivity guru will shareā¦.. Yesterday I sat on the couch for 7 hours. Binged Dave. Ate ice cream. Got a little high. Had no clue where my phone was. Iām a very effective person but part of the reason I get so much done is knowing when and how to take care of my body. Life is about knowing when to push and when to pause.', 'person': 'Amanda Goetz', 'source': 'https://twitter.com/AmandaMGoetz/status/1698403837109772576?s=20'}, {'text': 'Want to get ahead of everyone... ...reading about personal brands? ...bookmarking posts about personal brands? ...buying courses about personal brands? Step 1. Just start. Step 2. Keep going. Step 3. Learn. Step 4. Iterate. Step 5. Repeat. Learn by doing > Learn by watching', 'person': 'Amanda Goetz', 'source': 'https://twitter.com/AmandaMGoetz/status/1698769173084573902?s=20'}, {'text': "My 1 tip for climbing to VP at age twenty seven? My Managing Up Monday email. Most people do a horrible job of managing up & out yet it's the single most effective way to stand out from your colleagues. What is it? A weekly email to my boss & their boss. Why? 2 reasons. Managers only see a fraction of your work due to the breadth they cover. A way to prevent seagull management where someone gets anxious because they feel out of the loop and swoops in, causing chaos. Components. Weekly focus - the 2-3 Projects on my plate this week I'm pushing forward & how they align with the company goals. Last Week's Wins - Things that happened that they might not be aware of but worth celebrating. Need from you - Things I need to do my job better & faster. ", 'person': 'Amanda Goetz', 'source': 'https://twitter.com/AmandaMGoetz/status/1696895054713917608?s=20'}, {'text': 'When we combine various elements, we create new substances. This is no great surprise, but what can be surprising in the alloying process is that 2+2 can equal not 4 but 6 ā the alloy can be far stronger than the simple addition of the underlying elements would lead us to believe. This process leads us to engineer great physical objects, but we understand many intangibles in the same way; a combination of the right elements in social systems or even individuals can create a 2+2=6 effect similar to alloying.', 'person': 'Shane Parrish and Rhiannon Beaubien', 'source': 'https://fs.blog/mental-models/#learning_to_think_better'}, {'text': 'A catalyst either kick-starts or maintains a chemical reaction, but isnāt itself a reactant. The reaction may slow or stop without the addition of catalysts. Social systems, of course, take on many similar traits, and we can view catalysts in a similar light.', 'person': 'Shane Parrish and Rhiannon Beaubien', 'source': 'https://fs.blog/mental-models/#learning_to_think_better'}, {'text': 'A fire is not much more than a combination of carbon and oxygen, but the forests and coal mines of the world are not combusting at will because such a chemical reaction requires the input of a critical level of āactivation energyā in order to get a reaction started. Two combustible elements alone are not enough.', 'person': 'Shane Parrish and Rhiannon Beaubien', 'source': 'https://fs.blog/mental-models/#learning_to_think_better'}, {'text': 'Most of the engineering marvels of the world were accomplished with applied leverage. As famously stated by Archimedes, āGive me a lever long enough and I shall move the world.ā With a small amount of input force, we can make a great output force through leverage. Understanding where we can apply this model to the human world can be a source of great success.', 'person': 'Shane Parrish and Rhiannon Beaubien', 'source': 'https://fs.blog/mental-models/#learning_to_think_better'}, {'text': 'Velocity is not equivalent to speed; the two are sometimes confused. Velocity is speed plus vector: how fast something gets somewhere. An object that moves two steps forward and then two steps back has moved at a certain speed but shows no velocity. The addition of the vector, that critical distinction, is what we should consider in practical life.', 'person': 'Shane Parrish and Rhiannon Beaubien', 'source': 'https://fs.blog/mental-models/#learning_to_think_better'}, {'text': 'Both friction and viscosity describe the difficulty of movement. Friction is a force that opposes the movement of objects that are in contact with each other, and viscosity measures how hard it is for one fluid to slide over another. Higher viscosity leads to higher resistance. These concepts teach us a lot about how our environment can impede our movement.', 'person': 'Shane Parrish and Rhiannon Beaubien', 'source': 'https://fs.blog/mental-models/#learning_to_think_better'}, {'text': 'An object in motion with a certain vector wants to continue moving in that direction unless acted upon. This is a fundamental physical principle of motion; however, individuals, systems, and organizations display the same effect. It allows them to minimize the use of energy, but\xa0can cause them to be destroyed or eroded.', 'person': 'Shane Parrish and Rhiannon Beaubien', 'source': 'https://fs.blog/mental-models/#learning_to_think_better'}, {'text': 'The laws of thermodynamics describe energy in a closed system. The laws cannot be escaped and underlie the physical world. They describe a world in which useful energy is constantly being lost, and energy cannot be created or destroyed. Applying their lessons to the social world can be a profitable enterprise.', 'person': 'Shane Parrish and Rhiannon Beaubien', 'source': 'https://fs.blog/mental-models/#learning_to_think_better'}, {'text': 'If I push on a wall, physics tells me that the wall pushes back with equivalent force. In a biological system, if one individual acts on another, the action will tend to be reciprocated in kind. And of course, human beings act with intense reciprocity demonstrated as well.', 'person': 'Shane Parrish and Rhiannon Beaubien', 'source': 'https://fs.blog/mental-models/#learning_to_think_better'}, {'text': 'Relativity has been used in several contexts in the world of physics, but the important aspect to study is the idea that an observer cannot truly understand a system of which he himself is a part. For example, a man inside an airplane does not feel like he is experiencing movement, but an outside observer can see that movement is occurring. This form of relativity tends to affect social systems in a similar way.', 'person': 'Shane Parrish and Rhiannon Beaubien', 'source': 'https://fs.blog/mental-models/#learning_to_think_better'}, {'text': 'Hard to trace in its origin, Hanlonās Razor states that we should not attribute to malice that which is more easily explained by stupidity. In a complex world, using this model helps us avoid paranoia and ideology. By not generally assuming that bad results are the fault of a bad actor, we look for options instead of missing opportunities. This model reminds us that people do make mistakes. It demands that we ask if there is another reasonable explanation for the events that have occurred. The explanation most likely to be right is the one that contains the least amount of intent.', 'person': 'Shane Parrish and Rhiannon Beaubien', 'source': 'https://fs.blog/mental-models/#learning_to_think_better'}, {'text': 'Simpler explanations are more likely to be true than complicated ones. This is the essence of Occamās Razor, a classic principle of logic and problem-solving. Instead of wasting your time trying to disprove complex scenarios, you can make decisions more confidently by basing them on the explanation that has the fewest moving parts.', 'person': 'Shane Parrish and Rhiannon Beaubien', 'source': 'https://fs.blog/mental-models/#learning_to_think_better'}, {'text': 'Inversion is a powerful tool to improve your thinking because it helps you identify and remove obstacles to success. The root of inversion is āinvert,ā which means to upend or turn upside down. As a thinking tool it means approaching a situation from the opposite end of the natural starting point. Most of us tend to think one way about a problem: forward. Inversion allows us to flip the problem around and think backward. Sometimes itās good to start at the beginning, but it can be more useful to start at the end.', 'person': 'Shane Parrish and Rhiannon Beaubien', 'source': 'https://fs.blog/mental-models/#learning_to_think_better'}, {'text': 'Probabilistic thinking is essentially trying to estimate, using some tools of math and logic, the likelihood of any specific outcome coming to pass. It is one of the best tools we have to improve the accuracy of our decisions. In a world where each moment is determined by an infinitely complex set of factors, probabilistic thinking helps us identify the most likely outcomes. When we know these our decisions can be more precise and effective.', 'person': 'Shane Parrish and Rhiannon Beaubien', 'source': 'https://fs.blog/mental-models/#learning_to_think_better'}, {'text': 'Almost everyone can anticipate the immediate results of their actions. This type of first-order thinking is easy and safe but itās also a way to ensure you get the same results that everyone else gets. Second-order thinking is thinking farther ahead and thinking holistically. It requires us to not only consider our actions and their immediate consequences, but the subsequent effects of those actions as well. Failing to consider the second and third order effects can unleash disaster.', 'person': 'Shane Parrish and Rhiannon Beaubien', 'source': 'https://fs.blog/mental-models/#learning_to_think_better'}, {'text': 'Thought experiments can be defined as ādevices of the imagination used to investigate the nature of things.ā Many disciplines, such as philosophy and physics, make use of thought experiments to examine what can be known. In doing so, they can open up new avenues for inquiry and exploration. Thought experiments are powerful because they help us learn from our mistakes and avoid future ones. They let us take on the impossible, evaluate the potential consequences of our actions, and re-examine history to make better decisions. They can help us both figure out what we really want, and the best way to get there.', 'person': 'Shane Parrish and Rhiannon Beaubien', 'source': 'https://fs.blog/mental-models/#learning_to_think_better'}, {'text': 'First-principles thinking is one of the best ways to reverse-engineer complicated situations and unleash creative possibility. Sometimes called reasoning from first principles, itās a tool to help clarify complicated problems by separating the underlying ideas or facts from any assumptions based on them. What remains are the essentials. If you know the first principles of something, you can build the rest of your knowledge around them to produce something new.', 'person': 'Shane Parrish and Rhiannon Beaubien', 'source': 'https://fs.blog/mental-models/#learning_to_think_better'}, {'text': 'When ego and not competence drives what we undertake, we have blind spots. If you know what you understand, you know where you have an edge over others. When you are honest about where your knowledge is lacking you know where you are vulnerable and where you can improve. Understanding your circle of competence improves decision-making and outcomes.', 'person': 'Shane Parrish and Rhiannon Beaubien', 'source': 'https://fs.blog/mental-models/#learning_to_think_better'}, {'text': 'The map of reality is not reality. Even the best maps are imperfect. Thatās because they are reductions of what they represent. If a map were to represent the territory with perfect fidelity, it would no longer be a reduction and thus would no longer be useful to us. A map can also be a snapshot of a point in time, representing something that no longer exists. This is important to keep in mind as we think through problems and make better decisions.', 'person': 'Shane Parrish and Rhiannon Beaubien', 'source': 'https://fs.blog/mental-models/#learning_to_think_better'}, {'text': 'The last idea that I want to give you as you go out into a profession that frequently puts a lot of procedure and a lot of precautions and a lot of mumbo jumbo into what it does, this is not the highest\xa0form which\xa0civilization can reach. The highest\xa0form which\xa0civilization can reach is a seamless web of deserved trust. Not much procedure, just totally reliable people correctly trusting one another. Thatās the way an operating room works at the Mayo Clinic.', 'person': 'Charlie Munger', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jY1eNlL6NKs'}, {'text': 'Another thing of course is life will have terrible blows, horrible blows, unfair blows, doesnāt matter. And some people recover and others donāt. And there I think the attitude of Epictetus is the best. He thought that every mischance in life was an opportunity to behave well, every mischance in life was an opportunity to learn something, and your duty was not to be submerged in self-pity but to utilize the terrible blow in a constructive fashion. That is a very good idea.', 'person': 'Charlie Munger', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jY1eNlL6NKs'}, {'text': "Two partners that I chose for one little phase of my life had the following rule: They created a little design/build construction team, and they sat down and said, two-man partnership, divide everything equally, hereās the rule; 'Whenever weāre behind in our commitments to other people, we will both work 14 hours a day until weāre caught up.' Well, needless to say, that firm didnāt fail. The people died rich. Itās such a simple idea.", 'person': 'Charlie Munger', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jY1eNlL6NKs'}, {'text': 'Another thing that I found is an intense interest of the subject is indispensable if you are really going to excel. I could force myself to be fairly good in a lot of things, but I couldnāt be really good in anything where I didnāt have an intense interest. So to some extent, youāre going to have to follow me.\xa0If at all feasible you want to drift into doing something in which you really have a natural interest.', 'person': 'Charlie Munger', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jY1eNlL6NKs'}, {'text': 'I think the game of life in many respects is getting a lot of practice into the hands of the people that have the most aptitude to learn and the most tendency to be learning machines. And if you want the very highest reaches of human civilization thatās where you have to go. You do not want to choose a brain surgeon for your child among fifty applicants all of them just take turns during the procedure.\xa0You donāt want your airplanes designed that way.\xa0You donāt want your Berkshire Hathaways run that way.\xa0You want to get the power into the right people.', 'person': 'Charlie Munger', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jY1eNlL6NKs'}, {'text': 'Well we all remember that Darwin paid special attention to disconfirming evidence particularly when it disconfirmed something he believed and loved.\xa0Well, objectivity maintenance routines are totally required in life if youāre going to be a correct thinker. And there weāre talking about Darwinās attitude, his special attention to disconfirming evidence, and also to checklist routines.\xa0Checklist routines avoid a lot of errors. You should have all this elementary wisdom and then you should go through and have a checklist in order to use it. There is no other procedure that will work as well.', 'person': 'Charlie Munger', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jY1eNlL6NKs'}, {'text': 'The way I solved that is, I figured out the people I did admire and I maneuvered cleverly without criticizing anybody, so I was working entirely under people I admired. And a lot of law firms will permit that if youāre shrewd enough to work it out. And your outcome in life will be way more satisfactory and way better if you work under people you really admire. The alternative is not a good idea.', 'person': 'Charlie Munger', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jY1eNlL6NKs'}, {'text': 'Incentives are too powerful a controller of human cognition and human behavior, and one of the things you are going to find in some modern law firms is billable hour quotas. I could not have lived under a billable hour quota of 2,400 hours a year. That would have caused serious problems for me ā I wouldnāt have done it and I donāt have a solution for you for that. Youāll have to figure it out for yourself but itās a significant problem.', 'person': 'Charlie Munger', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jY1eNlL6NKs'}, {'text': 'Generally speaking, envy, resentment, revenge and self pity are disastrous modes of thought. Self-pity gets pretty close to paranoia, and paranoia is one of the very hardest things to reverse. You do not want to drift into self-pity.', 'person': 'Charlie Munger', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jY1eNlL6NKs'}, {'text': 'I have what I call an iron prescription that helps me keep sane when I naturally drift toward preferring one ideology over another. And that is I say āIām not entitled to have an opinion on this subject unless I can state the arguments against my position better than the people do who are supporting it. I think that only when I reach that stage am I qualified to speak.ā\xa0Now you can say thatās too much of an iron discipline..itās not too much of an iron discipline. Itās not even that hard to do.', 'person': 'Charlie Munger', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jY1eNlL6NKs'}, {'text': 'If youāre unreliable it doesnāt matter what your virtues are, youāre going to crater immediately.\xa0So doing what you have faithfully engaged to do should be an automatic part of your conduct. You want to avoid sloth and unreliability.', 'person': 'Charlie Munger', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jY1eNlL6NKs'}, {'text': 'The way complex adaptive systems work and the way mental constructs work, problems frequently get easier and I would even say usually\xa0are\xa0easier to solve if you turn around in reverse. In other words if you want to help India, the question you should ask is not āhow can I help India?ā, you think āwhatās doing the worst damage in India? What would automatically do the worst damage and how do I avoid it?ā\xa0Youād think they are logically the same thing, but theyāre not. Those of you who have mastered algebra know that inversion frequently will solve problems which nothing else will solve.\xa0And in life, unless youāre more gifted than Einstein, inversion will help you solve problems that you canāt solve in other ways.', 'person': 'Charlie Munger', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jY1eNlL6NKs'}, {'text': 'What I noted since the really big ideas carry 95% of the freight, it wasnāt at all hard for me to pick up all the big ideas from\xa0all the big disciplines and make them a standard part of my mental routines.\xa0Once you have the ideas, of course, they are no good if you donāt practice ā if you donāt practice you lose it. So I went through life constantly practicing this model of the multidisciplinary approach. Well, I canāt\xa0tell\xa0you what thatās done for me. Itās made life more fun, itās made me more constructive, itās made me more helpful to others, itās made me enormously rich, you name it, that attitude really helps. Now there are dangers there, because it works so well, that if you do it, you will frequently find you are sitting in the presence of some other expert, maybe even an expert thatās superior to you, supervising you. And you will know more than he does about his own specialty, a lot more. You will see the correct answer when heās missed it. It\xa0doesnāt help you just to know them enough just so you can give them back on an exam and get an A. You have to learn these things in such a way that theyāre in a mental latticework in your head and you automatically use them for the rest of your life.', 'person': 'Charlie Munger', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jY1eNlL6NKs'}, {'text': 'It means that youāre hooked for lifetime learning, and without lifetime learning you people are not going to do very well.\xa0You are not going to get very far in life based on what you already know.\xa0Youāre going to advance in life by what youāre going to learn after you leave hereā¦if civilization can progress only when it invents the method of invention, you can progress only when you learn the method of learning.', 'person': 'Charlie Munger', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jY1eNlL6NKs'}, {'text': 'Itās such a simple idea. Itās the golden rule so to speak:\xa0You want to deliver to the world what you would buy if you were on the other end.\xa0There is no ethos, in my opinion, that is better for any lawyer or any other person to have.\xa0By and large the people who have this ethos win in life and they donāt win just money, not just honors.\xa0They win the respect, the deserved trust of the people they deal with, and there is huge pleasure in life to be obtained from getting deserved trust.', 'person': 'Charlie Munger', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jY1eNlL6NKs'}, {'text': 'What is the one goal, if completed, that could change everything? What is the most urgent thing right now that you feel you āmustā or āshouldā do? Can you let the urgent āfailāāeven for a dayāto get to the next milestone for your potential life-changing tasks? Whatās been on your to-do list the longest? Start it first thing in the morning and donāt allow interruptions or lunch until you finish. Will ābadā things happen? Small problems will crop up, yes. A few people will complain and quickly get over it. BUT, the bigger picture items you complete will let you see these for what they areāminutiae and repairable hiccups. Make this trade a habit. Let the small bad things happen and make the big good things happen.', 'person': 'Tim Ferriss', 'source': 'https://x.com/tferriss/status/1693403435138236481?s=46&t=qgopL_Y6F84neSIfv-BoPA'}, {'text': "Life Hack: The 1-1-1 Method. Every single evening, write down three points: 1 win from the day, 1 point of tension, stress, or anxiety, & 1 point of gratitude. It's a simple 5 minute practice that provides an incredible return in the form of clarity and peace of mind.", 'person': 'Sahil Bloom', 'source': 'https://x.com/sahilbloom/status/1693260913900425474?s=46&t=qgopL_Y6F84neSIfv-BoPA'}, {'text': "Knowledge and productivity are like compound interest.' Given two people of approximately the same ability and one person who works ten percent more than the other, the latter will more than twice outproduce the former. The more you know, the more you learn; the more you learn, the more you can do; the more you can do, the more the opportunity - it is very much like compound interest. I don't want to give you a rate, but it is a very high rate. Given two people with exactly the same ability, the one person who manages day in and day out to get in one more hour of thinking will be tremendously more productive over a lifetime.", 'person': 'Richard Hamming', 'source': 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html'}, {'text': 'āEvery person on that island was a fucking star, and they were always holding seminars on radios or the engine. It was such an invigorating place.ā\xa0', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-SpaceX-Fantastic-Future/dp/006230125X'}, {'text': 'The sun rose at 7 A.M. each day, and thatās when the SpaceX team got to work. A series of meetings would take place with people listing what needed to get done, and debating solutions to lingering problems.', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-SpaceX-Fantastic-Future/dp/006230125X'}, {'text': 'I think a good model for thinking of the Weekly Review is as an operating system. It is the backbone of everything else that happens during your week; the master program on which all other programs run; the environment that creates the context for hundreds of small decisions and behaviors.', 'person': 'Tiago Forte', 'source': 'https://medium.com/praxis-blog/the-weekly-review-is-an-operating-system-8e8e04f885ab'}, {'text': "To the extent that you enjoy working hard, do. Subject to that constraint, it's not clear that the returns to effort ever diminish substantially. If you're lucky enough to enjoy it a lot, be grateful and take full advantage!", 'person': 'Patrick Collison', 'source': 'https://patrickcollison.com/advice'}, {'text': 'Notifications in the least places: Iām trying to have my notifications in as few places as possible. I have selected my email inbox and Slack and I donāt check notifications anywhere else.', 'person': 'Jean-Charles Samuelian', 'source': 'https://alan.com/en/blog/discover-alan/a/self-organization-guide'}, {'text': 'I take a lot of notes though Iāve never referred to the notes later. I was reading this great book about memory. When you take notes, itās actually like a double helping of memory, a double chance to remember something.', 'person': 'Marc Andreessen', 'source': 'https://a16z.com/marc-andreessen-on-productivity-scheduling-reading-habits-work-and-more/'}, {'text': 'He used sometimes to spend whole days without doing any work, yet without leaving the palace, or even his work-room. In these days of leisure, which was but apparent, for it usually concealed an increase of cerebral activity, Napoleon appeared embarrassed how to spend his time.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'I shall be credited with great profundity and subtlety in things which perhaps were simplicity itselfā¦', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'My great and most distinctive talent is to see everything in a clear light; even my eloquence is of the kind which sees the core of each question from all its facets at once - like the perpendicular, which is shorter than the diagonal.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'Mohammed came at a moment when general opinion was ready for a single Godā¦ A man is but a man, but often he can do much; often he is a tinderbox in the midst of inflammable matter.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'There is a moment in every battle at which the least manoeuvre is decisive and gives superiority, as one drop of water causes overflow. ', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'Sometimes a single battle decides everything, and sometimes, too, the slightest circumstance decides the issue of a battle. ', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'The issue of a battle is the result of a single instant, a single thought. The adversaries come into each otherās presence with various combinations; they mingle; they fight for a length of time; the decisive moment appears; a psychological spark makes the decision; and a few reserve troops are enough to carry it out.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'All great events hang by a single thread. The clever man takes advantage of everything, neglects nothing that may give him some added opportunity; the less clever man, by neglecting one thing, sometimes misses everything.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'The art of war consists, with a numerically inferior army, in always having larger forces than the enemy at the point which is to be attacked or defended. But this art can be learned neither from books nor from practice: it is an intuitive way of acting which properly constitutes the genius of war.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'The chief virtues of a soldier are constancy and discipline. Valor comes only in second place.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': '[Instructions, 1801, to his personal librarian] Every day, Citizen Ripault will obtain copies of all the newspapers except the eleven political papers. He will read them carefully and will analyse whatever they contain that might influence public opinion, especially as regards religion, philosophy, and political ideas. He will submit his analytical summary to me daily between five and six oāclock. Every ten days, he will submit to me the analysis of the brochures or books published within the last ten days and designate those passages which might affect public morality or which might interest me from the political or moral point of view. He will take to secure [copies of] all the plays that are performed and to analyse them for me, adding observations of the same nature as above. This analysis must be completed, at the latest, forty-eight hours after a play has been performed. Every first and sixth day between five and six oāclock, he will submit to me a bulletin on the posters, placards, or advertisements that may be worthy of attention; he will also report on whatever has come to his knowledge and has been done or said in the various lycĆ©es, literary assembles, sermons, newly established schools, or sensational court hearings that might be of interest from the point of view of politics or morals.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'No one knew so well as he how to sort papers, documents, and statements. Lists were to be all of like dimensions, clothed in uniform binding, arranged in identical order. The same with estimates. ā¦ For foreign armies and fleets he has boxes with compartments in which slide cards inscribed with the regiments and vessels. ā¦ On all subjects he has a collection of information of the same order, dictionaries of individuals arranged by classes or by states. ā¦ It is this machinery, this spirit of order and method which he brings to bear on everything, that choice of those around him, which alone are capable, not of explaining, but of rendering credible, the amount of work which Napoleon got through, and which is actually ten times more important than one imagines; for he was not content to grasp the whole, he entered into the smallest detail, and for fourteen years it was he who thought for eighty millions of men.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'I cannot write well, because my ideas and my hand are in two different currents. The ideas go faster, and then good-bye legibility! I can only dictate, and this is convenient, because it is as if I were conversing.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'During the night, enter my chamber as seldom as possible. Do not awake me when you have any good news to communicate; with that there is no hurry. But when you bring bad news, rouse me instantly, for then there is not a moment to be lost.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'I arrive tired, I must stay up all night for administrative work, and I must go everywhere in person to restore order.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': "He [Napoleon] told me that he had frequently laboured in state affairs for fifteen hours, without a moment's cessation, or even having taken any nourishment. On one occasion, he had continued at his labors for three days and nights, without laying [sic] down to sleep.", 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'I have no ambition - or, if I have any, it is so natural to me, so innate, so intimately linked with my existence that it is like the blood that circulates my veins, like the air I breathe. It causes me to act neither more precipitately, nor in any way differently, than do the natural motives that move me.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'Work is my element. I was born and built for work. I have known the limitations of my legs, I have known the limitations of my eyes; I have never been able to know the limitations of my working capacity.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'All my life I have sacrificed everything - comfort, self-interest, happiness - to my destiny. Destiny must be fulfilled - that is my chief doctrine. ', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'Iām always working, and I meditate a great deal.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'The Emperor explained the clarity of his ideas and his ability to prolong his occupations indefinitely without experiencing fatigue by saying that each object and each business was filed in his head as in a chest of drawers. āWhen I wish to interrupt one occupation,ā he said, āI shut its drawer and open another. They do not mix, and when I am busy with one I am not importuned or tired by the otherā¦ When I want to sleep, I shut all the drawers, and I am fast asleep.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'Hereās what I like in a workspace: natural light, quiet, knowing that I wonāt be interrupted if I donāt want to be, long blocks of time, and being comfortable and relaxed (Iāve got a beautiful desk with a couple of 4k monitors on it in my office, but I spend almost all my time on my couch with my laptop).', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/productivity'}, {'text': 'I use a full spectrum LED light most mornings for about 10-15 minutes while I catch up on email. Itās greatāif you try nothing else in here, this is the thing Iād try. Itās a ridiculous gain for me. I like this one, and itās easy to travel with.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/productivity'}, {'text': 'Focus is a force multiplier on work. Almost everyone Iāve ever met would be well-served by spending more time thinking about what to focus onā¦ Once you have figured out what to do, be unstoppable about getting your small handful of priorities accomplished quickly. I have yet to meet a slow-moving person who is very successful.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/how-to-be-successful'}, {'text': 'I have a fixed budget of cognitive output per day. I can spend that on whatever. If I let it go on unimportant stuff then I never have time to get to the really important stuff. Itās so easy to get heads down and focused and sort of miss what am I actually accomplishing. The number of people who have said to me, āMan I thought for ten years I was doing incredible work because I felt like I was creating a huge amount of output. But in retrospect it was in the wrong direction,ā is always depressing.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://www.ycombinator.com/blog/sam-altman-on-choosing-projects-creating-value-and-finding-purpose/'}, {'text': 'Minimize your own cognitive load from distracting things that donāt really matter. Itās hard to overstate how important this is, and how bad most people are at it. Get rid of distractions in your life. Develop very strong ways to avoid letting crap you donāt like doing pile up and take your mental cycles, especially in your work life.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/the-days-are-long-but-the-decades-are-short'}, {'text': 'I wrote custom software for the annoying things I have to do frequently, which is great. I also made an effort to learn to type really fast and the keyboard shortcuts that help with my workflow.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/productivity'}], 'people': ['Alex Lieberman', 'Alexey Guzey', 'Amanda Goetz', 'Andrew Wilkinson', 'Charlie Munger', 'Elon Musk', 'Jean-Charles Samuelian', 'Jensen Huang', 'Marc Andreessen', 'Michael Moritz', 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'Napoleon', 'Nat Friedman', 'Naval Ravikant', 'Patrick Collison', 'Richard Hamming', 'Sahil Bloom', 'Sam Altman', 'Shane Parrish and Rhiannon Beaubien', 'Tiago Forte', 'Tim Ferriss', 'Yishan Wong'], 'sources': ['http://algeri-wong.com/yishan/engineering-management-tools-are-top-priority.html', 'https://a16z.com/marc-andreessen-on-productivity-scheduling-reading-habits-work-and-more/', 'https://alan.com/en/blog/discover-alan/a/self-organization-guide', 'https://aletteraday.substack.com/p/letter-134-michael-moritz-and-robert', 'https://blog.samaltman.com/how-to-be-successful', 'https://blog.samaltman.com/productivity', 'https://blog.samaltman.com/the-days-are-long-but-the-decades-are-short', 'https://ecorner.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2003/01/1125.pdf', 'https://fs.blog/mental-models/#learning_to_think_better', 'https://guzey.com/lifehacks/', 'https://medium.com/praxis-blog/the-weekly-review-is-an-operating-system-8e8e04f885ab', 'https://nabeelqu.co/advice', 'https://nat.org/', 'https://patrickcollison.com/advice', 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/', 'https://twitter.com/AmandaMGoetz/status/1696190864119279969?s=20', 'https://twitter.com/AmandaMGoetz/status/1696895054713917608?s=20', 'https://twitter.com/AmandaMGoetz/status/1698345143483396519?s=20', 'https://twitter.com/AmandaMGoetz/status/1698403837109772576?s=20', 'https://twitter.com/AmandaMGoetz/status/1698769173084573902?s=20', 'https://twitter.com/awilkinson/status/1698772216584999035?s=20', 'https://twitter.com/businessbarista/status/1681060236482715648', 'https://venturehacks.com/always-assume-competition', 'https://venturehacks.com/writing', 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-SpaceX-Fantastic-Future/dp/006230125X', 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230', 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html', 'https://www.ycombinator.com/blog/sam-altman-on-choosing-projects-creating-value-and-finding-purpose/', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jY1eNlL6NKs', 'https://x.com/sahilbloom/status/1693260913900425474?s=46&t=qgopL_Y6F84neSIfv-BoPA', 'https://x.com/tferriss/status/1693403435138236481?s=46&t=qgopL_Y6F84neSIfv-BoPA', 'https://youtu.be/DxREm3s1scA?si=8eZvBW_xFFq4PjSm&t=1043', 'https://youtu.be/DxREm3s1scA?si=CJ_Eq2z4c02irjds&t=8319', 'https://youtu.be/DxREm3s1scA?si=Df23C3FUb_N-Hl0L&t=8433', 'https://youtu.be/DxREm3s1scA?si=M_H288JxviwG4GWy&t=1301', 'https://youtu.be/DxREm3s1scA?si=RfBMil7fRIQHWLzy&t=8379', 'https://youtu.be/DxREm3s1scA?si=TB1aNc0R6VFmcc5G&t=1169', 'https://youtu.be/DxREm3s1scA?si=YiLZ3XwsNGEpJx06&t=1097', 'https://youtu.be/DxREm3s1scA?si=aj7xO8VEqtdGnFEA&t=1500', 'https://youtu.be/DxREm3s1scA?si=vEASaOafIrnKxQQw&t=8494']}
{'name': 'Project management šļø', 'count': 1, 'people_count': 1, 'sources_count': 1, 'quotes': [{'text': "So basically, thereās two kinds of projects. Apple has this concept they call the directly responsible individual, the D.R.I. For any project, Iāve tried to identify the DRI. Who is the person responsible for delivering the project? If thatās me, then the project itself gets on my calendar. If it doesnāt go on the calendar, it is not getting done. The weekly check in is for all the projects other people are responsible for. As an example, you could have a company raising money or going through a big transaction. I donāt want to hound the entrepreneur or the CEO every day necessarily but at least want to stay up-to-date on a frequent basis, right? I never want these things to just go dark where youāre going 'Whatever happened to that?'", 'person': 'Marc Andreessen', 'source': 'https://a16z.com/marc-andreessen-on-productivity-scheduling-reading-habits-work-and-more/'}], 'people': ['Marc Andreessen'], 'sources': ['https://a16z.com/marc-andreessen-on-productivity-scheduling-reading-habits-work-and-more/']}
{'name': 'Running a startup š', 'count': 94, 'people_count': 16, 'sources_count': 23, 'quotes': [{'text': 'One key to effective negotiation is to have multiple options and be OK with it not working out. Even if you really need the thing, itās never your only choice: reframe and create alternative options until you have multiple outcomes youāre ok with.', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': "Ultimately I don't believe you can create a company without a lot of effort and that you need to lead by example. So Bill Walsh, in the first chapter of his book, he asks this question, how do you know you are doing the job? And this is the quote that he gave everyone when asked that question. \n\nDo you know how to tell if you're doing the job? If you're up at 3 AM evert night talking into a tape recorder and writing notes on scraps of paper, have a knot in your stomach and a rash on your skin, are losing sleep and losing touch with your wife and kids, have no appetite or sense of humor, and feel that everything might turn out wrong, then you're probably doing the job. \n\nSo if this is how you feel everyday then you're probably on the right track. If it doesn't sound appetizing then you shouldn't start a business truthfully.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': 'Similarly, often one that people get wrong is office space. So one natural thing is when you need an office to have an office manager of your team go out and find offices. And they will go out and come back with photos and ideas. You need to do that yourself. The office environment that people work in everyday dictates the culture that you are going to be in. And the final thing, then I am going to take some questions, is around effort.', 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': "So some things will look like a problem, and they are actually colds, they are just going to go away. So somebody is annoyed about this or that, that is a cold, you shouldn't stress about it and you certainly should not allocate all your time to it. And some things are going to present themselves as colds, but just like in the emergency room if they are not diagnosed properly they can actually become fatal.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': 'So at first, when you start a company everything is going to feel like a mess. And it really should. If you have too much process, too much predictability, you are probably not innovating fast enough and creatively enough. So it should feel like everyday there is a new problem and what you are doing is fundamentally triaging.', 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': "Now as a leader, what is your real job, what's your role? Strictly speaking there is only one book ever written that actually explains how to do this. It's rather old, written in 1982 by Andy Grove, it's quite famous, and successful. And his definition of what your job is, is to maximize the output of the organization. Your organization that you are responsible for, so the CEOās (responsible for) everything and VP would be a part of the organization, and the organizations around you. So if you are a VPE, you are actually responsible for the performance of the product team and the marketing team because you have influence there.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': 'As Warren Buffett says, build a company that idiots could run because eventually they will. So this is what you want. Basically a performance machine that idiots can run.', 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': "So basically what you are doing when building a company is building an engine. At first you have a drawing on a white board and you are architecting it, and it looks especially clean, beautiful, and pretty. But when you actually start translating it to practice it actually starts looking more like this and you're holding it together with duct tape. It takes a lot of effort from people to hold it together, that's why people work 80-100 hours a week. It's that heroic effort to keep this thing together because you don't actually, yet, have polished metal in place. Eventually you want to construct a very high performance machine. A machine that almost nobody really has to worry about every hour, every minute.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': "You have been forging a product and now you are forging a company. And I would actually argue, forging a company is a lot harder than forging a product. Basic reason is people are irrational. We all know this. Either your parents, your significant other, your brother or sister, your teacher, somebody in your life is irrational. Building a company is basically like taking all the irrational people you know putting them in one building, and then living with them twelve hours a day at least. It's very challenging.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive'}, {'text': 'I canāt imagine, you know, that 100 years from now people would say, you know, āLike, I wishāā to paraphrase Jeff Bezosāālike, I just wish you would have raised prices on us, Amazon,ā or āI wish he would deliver these goods a little bit more slowly.ā I think this is very much the case for Ramp. I think people want to, no matter what theyāre creating, if you can create great work with less effort, less time, fewer dollars, I think thatās always going to be in style. And so I would say I would start first with being curious about peopleās problems in the timeless, who are real customers that could serve, what are real businesses, and what are actual problems that they have now, and what are these problems that are not going to go away? And then I think you start to discover and uncover new technological shifts that can help you solve this in a new and unique, or in some cases, very disruptive way. And so I would say, like, focus on the timeless would be my top advice for this.', 'person': 'Eric Glyman', 'source': 'https://www.sequoiacap.com/podcast/training-data-eric-glyman/'}, {'text': 'But I actually think when you look at Ramp and part of whatās made it work has really been starting with what are the timeless truths that are not going to change whether itās now or 10 years from now, or a hundred years from now.', 'person': 'Eric Glyman', 'source': 'https://www.sequoiacap.com/podcast/training-data-eric-glyman/'}, {'text': 'Well, first, I mean, part of being a founder and a builder, I think, is just about, like, running this very long-standing and continuous race. I think that great companies are built over many years and decades, and I hope Ramp is the last company that I ever work on. I want to be working on it for a long time. And I think thereās always these questions of whatās changing in the world, and how is that going to reset certain industries. And I think thereās a lot of opportunities, and we can talk about, like, the places to be spending time.', 'person': 'Eric Glyman', 'source': 'https://www.sequoiacap.com/podcast/training-data-eric-glyman/'}, {'text': 'Itāsālook, for me, I happen to think a lot of purpose in life is creation. I think people build tools, I think, you know, want to move things forward. And so look, donāt get me wrong, Iām sure people will find more time for leisure but, you know, I think of itāthere was a really interestingāthere was something that was making the rounds a few months agoāI need to find it. I think it was a set of statistics that the number of bookkeepersāthere was a crisis in the U.S. how the number of bookkeepers had dropped by, I think over the last 10 to 20 years, like, a million less bookkeepers were employed, and people saying what was happening to all the bookkeepers? And it turned out if you looked at job descriptions for financial analysts, strategists, CFOs, that had grown by almost a million. And functionally there really wasnāt much of a change, but people were doing different things. Rather than tagging, tabulating, doing low-value tasks, people, I think, had moved to a higher level of abstraction in doing more valuable work for a business. And I thinkāI actually think a lot of that will happen.', 'person': 'Eric Glyman', 'source': 'https://www.sequoiacap.com/podcast/training-data-eric-glyman/'}, {'text': 'And I think now today, functionally you can have human-level reasoning, and in some cases superhuman level reasoning available through an API. I think it has profound ramifications for people building businesses. And I think itās expressed not just in the ability to understand large sets of data and act on it, but itās a wider variety. I think that thereāsāI can say beyond even just the services weāre providing to Ramp, part of how weāve grown so quickly is we have AI automation and outreach, or we have SDRs that are multiple times more productive than a competitorās. Itās changed how we do customer service, itās changed how we do copywriting. We can listen to 100,000 sales calls at once and ask āwhat did 100,000 people think?ā Itās just things that werenāt possible even just a few years ago. And so I think itās changed really rapidly. And I donāt think most people are reallyāI think people are experimenting in some cases with ChatGPT, which is great, but I think far too few people have actually started to incorporate into the crevices of how theyāre actually working day to day and have felt it. But I think it should accelerate.', 'person': 'Eric Glyman', 'source': 'https://www.sequoiacap.com/podcast/training-data-eric-glyman/'}, {'text': 'And I think part of why, you know, as weāre releasing products, engineers are on the call with customers when we ship. Theyāre accountable for metrics, and how it ultimately performs. And you really wonāt find people at Ramp who havenāt talked to customers with any level of recency. And I think thatās just a core part of what makes great product cultures.', 'person': 'Eric Glyman', 'source': 'https://www.sequoiacap.com/podcast/training-data-eric-glyman/'}, {'text': 'Which is to say, you know, you can go to a small startup with 10 people, and everyoneās talking to users. And then somehow you go to a company with 500 to 1,000 people, and you try to figure out whoās talked to a customer over the last weekāhopefully all the salespeople. But you start talking in marketing and engineering, and people havenāt done it. And what I would argue, look, I think the most important thing beyond just empathy, if youāre trying to make great products, you need to have great taste. You need people who are making to so deeply understand really the experience of building, the pain that people are going through, you know, what theyāre actuallyāyou know, the customer at the end is actually doing in order to run your business, that you understand it not just decently, but in some cases better than the customer has. And I think only then can you actually build products that are so well designed that they can actually automate the tasks. They can do it more efficiently.', 'person': 'Eric Glyman', 'source': 'https://www.sequoiacap.com/podcast/training-data-eric-glyman/'}, {'text': 'Well, so a couple of things, I mean, I would go back to again, like, what is Ramp like? Weāre not some AI-driven finance tool that weāre going to market. Do you want to adopt AI in your finance team? No. We exist to save you time and money. We lead with the benefit. We talk about the outcome that weāre trying to drive, and we put these in simple terms.', 'person': 'Eric Glyman', 'source': 'https://www.sequoiacap.com/podcast/training-data-eric-glyman/'}, {'text': 'Weāre excited by the idea of building a great company with a small A+ team. For this to be possible, itās essential that the entire team operates with a lot of freedom. The corollary, is that with freedom comes responsibility. Freedom means that you define your work as much as your manager. And that means you must be proactive with defining your work and getting ahead of your work, often getting ahead of the roadmap weeks in advance. Freedom means that anyone within the org can be a DRI with ownership over a project. And that means that itās your responsibility to ensure the project gets done. Freedom means that you donāt have to wait for permission. And that means we assume positive intent, we support not reprimand, and we donāt implement red tape as a reaction to one thing going wrong one time.', 'person': 'Jacob Peters', 'source': 'https://nextplayso.substack.com/p/spotlight-superpower'}, {'text': 'On Wednesdays meetings are banned within the company. This is a day for us to do deep work. As much as possible, this shouldnāt just apply to Wednesday. We should aim to minimize meetings and do deep work multiple days a week. In particular, we also try to avoid all meetings after 1pm on Monday & Friday. It is encouraged for you to close Slack, block notifications, and enter deep work.', 'person': 'Jacob Peters', 'source': 'https://nextplayso.substack.com/p/spotlight-superpower'}, {'text': 'Our standard isnāt good. It isnāt even great. It is insanely great. This might seem contradictory to speed. But it isnāt. Speed is what allows us to get to insanely great. We donāt reach insanely great by theorizing. We reach it it by doing. By experimenting. By shipping. We are constantly pursuing excellence and pushing to be better.', 'person': 'Jacob Peters', 'source': 'https://nextplayso.substack.com/p/spotlight-superpower'}, {'text': "[On operational tracking of product bets] We just build a nice tracking system. We use Jira to track every single bet, and everything feeds into dashboards. You open the dashboard and see the list of unlaunched bets, the ones being developed, or those in approval processes. You see how much gross profit each bet generates. It's very visual and clear.", 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXubBqd8uXs'}, {'text': "I'm very cost-conscious as well. People who throw money at problems are wrong. What really delivers the most is brainpower. When you sit down and think about how to solve the problem in the most cost-effective and efficient way, thatās much more powerful than spending millions on external consultants or hiring super-experienced professionals for a lot of money.", 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXubBqd8uXs'}, {'text': '[On scaling product bets that work] Launch it and look at how much money it generates month one, month two, month three, month four. Compare it with other bets. If the top 30ā40% grow, allow them to hire additional teams. One team becomes two, then three, and so on.', 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXubBqd8uXs'}, {'text': 'Then all the unpleasant problems no one else solves go to me. I end up doing all the shitty jobs and solving problems no one else wants or can solve. Itās pretty unpleasant. 99% of the time itās not pleasureājust pain, pressure, and stress.', 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXubBqd8uXs'}, {'text': "Well, basically it's the whole goal setting, right? So we set up the goals for the companies, usually five or six goals a year, and then we quantify these goalsāwhat we meant to achieve. Then we cascade the goals to the department level, then the team level, and then individual level. Every single team, department, and the company has metrics describing the performance. All people go through the performance review process every quarter and are judged based on the metrics they delivered, their skills, and cultural values.", 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXubBqd8uXs'}, {'text': "When the company laid off over 100 people and I hired experienced executives, I realized it wasn't workingāthey failed miserably. To fix things, I hired my own team of eight smart, bright young people from backgrounds like McKinsey, investment banking, engineering, and design to build solutions. I assigned one or two people to each problem or department needing turnaround. This led to the creation of the concept of founder associates. Now, it's a team of about 30 to 40 people, some reporting to me and others to the Chief of Staff, but their roles remain consistent.", 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZcTLjMTVZ4'}, {'text': 'Transparency is crucial. When you start traditional management, it can be the beginning of the end for the company. Reality is important for every manager to be both strategic and detailed. Managers need to engage with individual contributors through all management layers to understand the reality. The problem is that most managers lack attention to detail, which hinders effective direction.', 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZcTLjMTVZ4'}, {'text': 'I quantify everything a person, team, department, and company does. It starts with defining five to six company goals for the year. We cascade these goals to the department, team, and individual levels. We built the entire software around this approach, called Revolute People.', 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZcTLjMTVZ4'}, {'text': "I'm very controlling and dislike outside dependencies that I can't manage. As a result, early on, I brought everything in-house. In business, being dependent on a critical vendor can be detrimental. You might have to beg a vendor to fix bugs, which isn't worth it. Hence, the decision to internalize all operations.", 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZcTLjMTVZ4'}, {'text': "As a manager or founder, you need to know exactly what every person in the company is doing at any given time. This is crucial to prevent people from working on the wrong things or becoming lazy by focusing on unimportant tasks. It's essential to quantify everything to ensure that everyone is moving in the right direction and working diligently.", 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZcTLjMTVZ4'}, {'text': 'In product reviews, each product team presents how they plan to change their product, detailing client screens step by step in Figma.', 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZcTLjMTVZ4'}, {'text': 'We have about 40 to 45 direct reports. Each general manager is responsible for specific products. Since we have many products, we have up to 15 general managers, each overseeing their respective areas.', 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZcTLjMTVZ4'}, {'text': 'I still work directly with the designers and individual contributors whenever I want to make changes.', 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZcTLjMTVZ4'}, {'text': "In smaller companies with up to 100 people, you don't really need formal processes because everyone knows who is good and who isn't. However, once you exceed 100 people, having processes in place becomes necessary.", 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZcTLjMTVZ4'}, {'text': "On Mondays, I conduct business reviews for key departments, and half of Tuesday is also dedicated to business reviews. A Business Review is a standardized approach where each department's general managers report on KPIs, metrics, roadmaps, and problems, taking about 15 to 30 minutes per department.", 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZcTLjMTVZ4'}, {'text': "Usually, the business comes later, and the temptation for you as MBA students is you're often thinking about the business model early, great, because sometimes other people forget about that. But it starts with value delivery, not with value capture, so focus on that first and foremost.", 'person': 'Roelof Botha', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQAZ3iV3gSg&list=TLGGp__Zzi2H69UzMTEwMjAyNA'}, {'text': "I think it starts with authenticity, a lot of people talk about founder-market fit. The thing I actually look for is founder-problem fit, why are you the one who has the insight into this particular problem. Why are you so passionate about pursuing this? And the common thread for our most successful founders is not that they're doing it for the money. They're just passionate about solving a particular problem, something that is often very personal to them. Where they have this unique insight and they have a burning desire to solve this problem and to go and serve customers. And when they do and they deliver value, they somehow figure out a good business model to go along with that, and they scale.", 'person': 'Roelof Botha', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQAZ3iV3gSg&list=TLGGp__Zzi2H69UzMTEwMjAyNA'}, {'text': 'He learned one very big lesson from these ventures: āItās not the product that leads to success. Itās the ability to make the product efficiently. Itās about building the machine that builds the machine. In other words, how do you design the factory?ā It wasa guiding principle that Musk would make his own.', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': 'One of his maxims was that you should never use a cruise missile to kill a fly; just use a flyswatter. Was using a neural network to plan paths an unnecessarily complicated way to deal with a few very unlikely edge cases?', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': 'He had a core belief that you could not separate engineering from product design. In fact, product design should be driven by engineers. The company, like Tesla and SpaceX, should be engineering-led at all levels.', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': 'āOne of Elonās rules is āGo as close to the source as possible for information,āā Riley says. The line workers said they thought the tank walls could getas thin as 4.8 millimeters. āWhatabout four?ā Musk asked. āThat would make us pretty nervous,ā one of the workers replied. āOkay,ā Musk said, āletās do four millimeters. Letās give itatry.ā It worked.', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': 'Getting to Mars would cost serious money. So Musk combined, as he often did, an aspirational mission with a practical business plan. There were many revenue opportunities he could pursue, including space tourism (like Bezos and Branson) and satellite launches for the U.S. and other countries and companies. In late 2014, he turned his attention to what was a much bigger pot of gold: providing internet service to paying customers. SpaceX would make and launch its own communications satellites, in effect rebuilding the internet in outer space. āInternet revenue is about one trillion dollars a year,ā he says. āIf we can serve three percent, thatās $30 billion, which is more than NASAās budget. That was the inspiration for Starlink, to fund getting to Mars.ā He pauses, then adds for emphasis, āThe lens of getting to Mars has motivated every SpaceX decision.ā', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': 'Musk had come to realize that designing a good factory was like designing a microchip. It was important to create, in each patch, the right density, flow, and processes. So he paid the most attention to a monitor that showed each station on the assembly line with a green or red light indicating whether it was flowing properly. There were also green and red lights at the stations themselves, so Musk was able to walk the floor and home in on trouble spots. His team called it āwalk to the red.ā', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': 'The experience became a lesson that would become part of Muskās production algorithm. Always wait until the end of designing a processāafter you have questioned all the requirements and deleted unnecessary partsābefore you introduce automation.', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': '5. Automate. That comes last. The big mistake in Nevada and at Fremont was that I began by trying to automate every step. We should have waited until all the requirements had been questioned, parts and processes deleted,and the bugs were shaken out.', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': '4. Accelerate cycle time. Every process can be speeded up. But only do this after you have followed the first three steps. In the Tesla factory, I mistakenly spent a lot of time accelerating processes that I later realized should have been deleted.', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': '3. Simplify and optimize. This should come after step two. A common mistake is to simplify and optimizea part ora process that should not exist.', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': '2. Delete any part or process you can. You may have to add them back later. In fact, if you do not end up adding back at least 10% of them, then you didnāt delete enough.', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': '1. Question every requirement. Each should come with the name of the person who made it. You should never accept that a requirement came from a department, such as from āthe legal departmentā or āthe safety department.ā You need to know the name of the real person who made that requirement. Then you should question it, no matter how smart that person is. Requirements from smart people are the most dangerous, because people are less likely to question them. Always do so, even if the requirement came from me. Then make the requirements less dumb.', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': 'The point of a startup is to make usable technology for others. When you make software, you have to watch at least 10 people use it. Sit next to them and say absolutely nothing. Force yourself to marinate in the failure of your product design. \n\nEvery version 1 of any software will be absolutely destroyed by first interaction with users. You need to watch your new creation be absolutely misunderstood by users to reform version 1 into the one that actually works.\n\nThere is only one path: figuring out where the sharp edges, the places people get caught, the assumptions you make as a builder that turn out to be wrong, and then relentlessly sanding it down so that anyone can use it. \n\nThat is good design. That is the key to a good product. There is no shortcut for this. \n\nWATCH USERS AND CRINGE AND THEN FIX IT.\n\nSAND DOWN THE EDGES.', 'person': 'Garry Tan', 'source': 'https://x.com/garrytan/status/1849137742200135761'}, {'text': "Or engineers telling you, like, why are you looking at everything? And there was this paradox of CEO involvement. The less involved I got in a project, the more dysfunctional it got, the more dysfunctional it got, the more people assumed the dysfunction came from leadership. And then it was like an intervention, reverse intervention where I had to get even less involved. And then it would get so screwed up, then I would get involved. But now I'm involved in a totally dysfunctional project. So I'm now associated with dysfunction. There you go, Brian is always involved in all the most dysfunctional things at the company.", 'person': 'Brian Chesky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/@The-Art-of-Hiring/videos'}, {'text': "So it was crazy. So what I ended up doing, I took a playbook of Steve Jobs, Elon Musk does this, Jensen Huang does this, Walt Disney does this, all of them do this. If the CEO is the chief product officer in the company, then you should review all of the work. So I review every single thing in the company. If I don't review it, it doesn't ship.", 'person': 'Brian Chesky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/@The-Art-of-Hiring/videos'}, {'text': "The first thing I did is I went from a divisional structure to a functional organization. Functional organizations is what most of you are, you have design and engineering and product management or product marketing and sales. So we went back to a function organization where our goal was to have as few employees as possible. Steve Jobs said that like he didn't use these words, but he thought of the team as a special forces. We said were the Navy Seals, not the Navy. We want a small, lean, elite, highly skilled team, not a team of kind of mid-level battalion type people. And the reason why is every person brings with them a communication tax. The reason there's too many meetings in a company isn't because they don't have no meeting Wednesdays, it's because they have too many people. People create meetings, and the best way to get rid of meetings is to not have so many people", 'person': 'Brian Chesky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/@The-Art-of-Hiring/videos'}, {'text': 'The CEO should be the chief product officer of the company, because isnāt the most important thing for a company to make a product? And shouldnāt the person who knows most about the product be the CEO?', 'person': 'Brian Chesky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/@The-Art-of-Hiring/videos'}, {'text': 'You should start in the details, develop trust, develop muscle memory, and then let go.', 'person': 'Brian Chesky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/@The-Art-of-Hiring/videos'}, {'text': 'If you want people to work harder, have a launch deadline. Make the thing crazy ambitious and check every week. That is the way to make people work harder. You work as hard as the goal is ambitious and the frequency of your check-ins.', 'person': 'Brian Chesky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/@The-Art-of-Hiring/videos'}, {'text': 'I also knew that organizational ethics were crucial to ultimate and ongoing success. ', 'person': 'Bill Walsh', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.fr/Score-Takes-Care-Itself-Philosophy/dp/1591843472'}, {'text': '[My overriding goal] to implement what I call the Standard of Performance. It was a way of doing things, a leadership philosophy that has much to do with core values, principles, and ideals as with blocking, tackling, and passing; more to do with the mental than with the physical. ', 'person': 'Bill Walsh', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.fr/Score-Takes-Care-Itself-Philosophy/dp/1591843472'}, {'text': '[On advice to someone starting a company] Do it for the right reasons: you want to make an impact, you want to change the world, you want to see your product used by millions of people. Not because of money, or to stroke your ego.\xa0You start a company because you see an opening, and you just canāt fall asleep at night until you go after it.\xa0Founders have something to prove and theyāre persistent in going after it. No one is going to hand success to you. I remind my kids every day that the world is not fair; I donāt want them to think the world owes them anything. In the end, youāve got to perform, no matter how great your idea is.', 'person': 'Doug Leone', 'source': 'https://articles.sequoiacap.com/2018-06-20-doug-leone'}, {'text': "So let me walk through a little bit of transparency and different stages of transparency. Metrics are the first step. So everyone in your company should have access to what's going on. Other things I like to do, is to take your board decks. As you get more formal, the board decks will get more complicated. And actually review every single slide with every single employee after the board meeting. You can strip out the compensation information if you really want to. But every other slide you should go through with every single employee and explain it. If you can remember some of the feedback you got from your board that is really cool to pass on.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs'}, {'text': "So how do you create scale and leverage?\xa0The first thing I would recommend is to build a dashboard.\xa0This is an old Square dashboard, it looks pretty presentable even today. The construct of the dashboard should be drafted by the founder. You need to simplify the value proposition in the company's metrics for success on a whiteboard. You can have other people build the dashboard, I don't care about that. But you need to draw it out. Like what does business success look to us and key inputs to those and then have someone create something that is very intuitive for every single person in the company, including customer support to use. And then, the key metric of whether you succeed is what fraction of your employees use that dashboard every day? If it's actually useful, it should be close to 100%. It's not going to be probably 100% but you want to measure that. Just like you have quality scores for your other KPIās with users, your dashboard needs to be as intuitive as your product is for users.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs'}, {'text': "And then focus until you conquer this one problem. And the insight behind this is that most people will solve problems that they understand how to solve. Roughly speaking, they will solve B+ problems instead of A+ problems. A+ problems are high impact problems for your company but they are difficult. You don't wake up in the morning with a solution, so you tend to procrastinate them. So imagine you wake up in the morning and create a list of things to do today, there's usually the A+ one on the top of the list, but you never get around to it. And so you solve the second and third. Then you have a company of over a hundred people so it cascades. You have a company that is always solving B+ things which does mean you grow, which does mean you add value, but you never really create that breakthrough idea. No one is spending 100% of their time banging their head against the wall every day until they solve it. So I highly recommend some version of that. You can be less stringent, you can give people three things to work on, but I would still track the concept of what would happen if you\xa0only gave everybody one thing to prioritize.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs'}, {'text': "The other signal to look for is once you've hired someone, with an open office, just watch who goes up to other people's desks. Particularly people they don't report to. If someone keeps going to some individual employees desk and they\xa0don't report them, it's a sign that they believe that person can help them. So if you see that consistently, those are your barrels. Just promote them, give them as much opportunity as you can.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs'}, {'text': "And that's actually what you want to do with every since employee, every single day, is expand the scope of responsibilities until it breaks. And it will break, everybody, I couldn't run the world, everybody has some level of complexity that they can handle. And what you want to do is keep expanding it until you see where it breaks and that's the role they should stay in. That level of sophistication. But some people will surprise you. There will be some people that you do not expect. With different backgrounds, without a lot of experience that can just handle enormously complicated tasks. So keep testing that and pushing the envelope.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs'}, {'text': "One of the ways, the definition of a barrel is, they can take an idea from conception and take it all the way to shipping and bring people with them. And that's a very cultural skill set. Two questions are probably occurring to you. How can you tell who is a barrel and who is not? One is you start with a very small set of responsibilities, it can be very trivial.", 'person': 'Keith Rabois', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs'}, {'text': "So hereās a good rule of thumb: donāt worry about a competitor at all, until theyāre actually beating you with a real, shipped product. Press releases are easier to write than code, and that is still easier than making a great product. So remind your company of this, and this is sort of a founderās role, is not to let the company get down because of the competitors in the press.\n\nThis great quote from Henry Ford that I love: 'The competitor to be feared is one who never bothers about you at all, but goes on making his own business better all the time.'\n\nThese are almost never the companies that put out a lot of press releases. And they bum people out.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': "Apple, Google, and Facebook have each done this extremely well. It's not about the product, it's about everything they do. They move fast and they break things, they're frugal in the right places, but they care about quality everywhere.\xa0You don't buy people shitty computers if you don't want them to write shitty code. You have to set a quality bar that runs through the entire company. Related to this is that you have to be decisive. Indecisiveness is a startup killer.\xa0Mediocre founders spend a lot of time talking about grand plans, but they never make a decision. They're talking about you know I could do this thing, or I could do that other thing, and they're going back and forth and they never act. And what you actually need is this bias towards action.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': "So you have to be really intense. This only comes from the CEO, this only comes from the founders. One of the biggest advantages that start ups have is execution speed and you have to have this relentless operating rhythm. Facebook has this famous poster that says move fast and break things. But at the same time they manage to be obsessed with quality. And this is why it's hard.\xa0It's easy to move fast or be obsessed with quality, but the trick is to do both at a startup. You need to have a culture where the company has really high standards for everything everyone does, but you still move quickly.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': "The good news here is that a small amount of extra work on the right thing makes a huge difference. One example that I like to give is thinking about the\xa0viral coefficient\xa0for a consumer web product. How many new users each existing user brings in. If it's .99 the company will eventually flatline and die. And if it's 1.01 you'll be in this happy place of exponential growth forever. \n\nSo this is one concrete example of where a tiny extra bit of work is the difference between success and failure. When we talk to successful founders they tell stories like this all the time. Just outworking their competitors by a little bit was what made them successful.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': "The other piece besides focus for execution is intensity. Startups only work at a fairly intense level. A friend of mine says the secret to start up success is extreme focus and extreme dedication. You can have a startup and one other thing, you can have a family, but you probably can't have many other things. Startups are not the best choice for work life balance and that's sort of just the sad reality. There's a lot of great things about a startup, but this is not one of them. Startups are all-consuming in a way that is generally difficult to explain. You basically need to be willing to outwork your competitors.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': "So you want to have the right metrics and you want to be focused on growing those metrics and having momentum. Don't let the company get distracted or excited about other things. A common mistake is that companies get excited by their own\xa0PR. It's really easy to get PR with no results and it actually feels like you're really cool. But in a year you'll have nothing, and at that point you won't be cool anymore, and you'll just be talking about these articles from a year ago that, Oh you know these Stanford students start a new start up, it's going to be the next big thing and now you have nothing and that sucks.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': "I'm going to talk about this a little bit later, but growth and momentum are something you can never lose focus on. Growth and momentum are what a startup lives on and you always have to focus on maintaining these. You should always know how you're doing against your metrics, you should have a weekly review meeting every week, and you should be extremely suspicious if youāre ever talking about, weāre not focused on growth right now, weāre not growing that well right now but we're doing this other thing, we don't have a timeline for when we are going to ship this because we're focused on this other thing, weāre doing a re-brand, whatever, almost always a disaster.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': "The founders really set the focus. Whatever the founders care about, whatever the founders focus on, that's going to set the goals for the whole company. The best founders repeat these goals over and over, far more often than they think they should need to. They put them up on the walls they talk about them in one on ones and at all-hands meetings each week. And it keeps the company focus. One of the keys to focus, and why I said cofounders that aren't friends really struggle, is that you can't be focused without good communication. Even if you have only four or five people at a company, a small communication breakdown is enough for people to be working on slightly different things. And then you lose focus and the company just scrambles.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': 'The CEO, people ask me all the time about the jobs of the CEO. There are probably more than five, here are five that come up a lot in the early days. The first four everyone thinks of as CEO jobs: set the vision, raise money, evangelize the mission to people youāre trying to recruit, executives, partners, press, everybody, hire and manage the team.\xa0But the fifth one is setting the execution bar and this is not the one that most founders get excited about or envision themselves doing but I think it is actually one of the critical CEO roles and no one but the CEO can do this.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': "Alright, so now we're going to talk about execution. Execution for most founders is not the most fun part of running the company, but it is the most critical. Many cofounders think they're just signing up to this beautiful idea and then they're going to go be on magazine covers and go to parties.\xa0But really what itās about more than anything else, what being a cofounder really means, is signing up for this years long grind on execution and you canāt outsource this.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': 'If I had to say the most important traits of the most successful founders, Iāve already mentioned determination, that is by far the most important quality... Determination is the most important thing. Again, understanding your users and building a product with a great user experience is second most important. Not being distracted, not getting lured down these paths that arenāt gonna be important for building your product. Being flexible-minded Iāve always felt is very important because you have this idea and you test it out and it doesnāt always work the first time and so you have to be able to say, okay I thought I was gonna do this but letās try this, even though I have a lot of energy vested in this, letās try this direction. You really have to be open-minded and then ultimately, you have to be a good leader, you have to be convincing and a good leader because you are gonna be convincing employees to join you, youāre gonna be convincing investors to invest in you, when you do get to the point where youāre doing deals with bigger companies, you have to convince them, your whole world is convincing people and so you have to be able to communicate your idea and convince people why they should care about you more than any of the other hundreds of startups out there.', 'person': 'Jessica Livingston', 'source': 'https://www.ycombinator.com/blog/jessica-livingston-on-htfbt/'}, {'text': "It's all about users. The most reliable way to become a billionaire is to start a company that grows fast, and the way to grow fast is to make what users want. Newly started startups have no choice but to delight users, or they'll never even get rolling. But this never stops being the lodestar, and bigger companies take their eye off it at their peril. Stop delighting users, and eventually someone else will. ", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/ace.html'}, {'text': "The best thing you can do in a YC interview is to teach the partners about your users. So if you want to prepare for your interview, one of the best ways to do it is to go talk to your users and find out exactly what they're thinking. Which is what you should be doing anyway.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/ace.html'}, {'text': "So this is one thing the YC partners will almost certainly dig into during your interview. Who are your first users going to be, and how do you know they want this? If I had to decide whether to fund startups based on a single question, it would be. How do you know people want this? The most convincing answer is because we and our friends want it. It's even better when this is followed by the news that you've already built a prototype, and even though it's very crude, your friends are using it, and it's spreading by word of mouth. If you can say that and you're not lying, the partners will switch from default no to default yes. Meaning you're in unless there's some other disqualifying flaw. ", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/ace.html'}, {'text': "There have to be some people who want what you're building right now, and want it so urgently that they're willing to use it, bugs and all, even though you're a small company they've never heard of. There don't have to be many, but there have to be some. As long as you have some users, there are straightforward ways to get more: build new features they want, seek out more people like them, get them to refer you to their friends, and so on. But these techniques all require some initial seed group of users.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/ace.html'}, {'text': "That's what the partners will be trying to figure out: is there a path to a huge market? Usually the path to a huge market is by growing a small market. This idea is important enough that it's worth coining a phrase for, so let's call one of these small but growable markets a larval market.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/ace.html'}, {'text': 'What YC looks for, above all, is founders who understand some group of users and can make what they want. This is so important that it\'s YC\'s motto: "Make something people want."', 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/ace.html'}, {'text': 'The way to succeed in a startup is to focus on the goal of getting lots of users, and keep walking swiftly toward it while investors and acquirers scurry alongside trying to wave money in your face.', 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/startuplessons.html'}, {'text': "Startup founders are naturally optimistic. They wouldn't do it otherwise. But you should treat your optimism the way you'd treat the core of a nuclear reactor: as a source of power that's also very dangerous. You have to build a shield around it, or it will fry you.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/startuplessons.html'}, {'text': 'The most important quality in a startup founder is determination. Not intelligence-- determination.', 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/startuplessons.html'}, {'text': "Way more startups hose themselves than get crushed by competitors. There are a lot of ways to do it, but the three main ones are internal disputes, inertia, and ignoring users. Each is, by itself, enough to kill you. But if I had to pick the worst, it would be ignoring users. If you want a recipe for a startup that's going to die, here it is: a couple of founders who have some great idea they know everyone is going to love, and that's what they're going to build, no matter what.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/startuplessons.html'}, {'text': 'You should compete against what someone else could be doing, not just what you can see people doing.', 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/startuplessons.html'}, {'text': "In the best case these two suggestions get combined: you tell visitors what your site is about by showing them. One of the standard pieces of advice in fiction writing is 'show, don't tell.' Don't say that a character's angry; have him grind his teeth, or break his pencil in half. Nothing will explain what your site does so well as using it.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/startuplessons.html'}, {'text': 'for startups, chaos is directly proportional to growth chaos, to a certain degree, is usually an indicator the right stuff is happening. chaotic and growing is the best state', 'person': 'Alexandr Wang', 'source': 'https://twitter.com/alexandr_wang/status/1653943994769096707?s=20'}, {'text': "The biggest epiphany I've had this year is that what really matters is the machine that builds the machine the factory and that is at least towards a magnitude harder than the vehicle itself", 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.ycombinator.com/library/6W-elon-musk-on-how-to-build-the-future'}, {'text': "The thing I probably repeat most is this recipe for a startup: get a version 1 out fast, then improve it based on users' reactions. By 'release early' I don't mean you should release something full of bugs, but that you should release something minimal. Users hate bugs, but they don't seem to mind a minimal version 1, if there's more coming soon.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/startuplessons.html?viewfullsite=1'}, {'text': "Techniques for competing with delegation translate well into business, because delegation is endemic there. Instead of avoiding it as a drawback of senility, many companies embrace it as a sign of maturity. In big companies software is often designed, implemented, and sold by three separate types of people. In startups one person may have to do all three. And though this feels stressful, it's one reason startups win. The needs of customers and the means of satisfying them are all in one head.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/marginal.html'}, {'text': 'Well, itās really, really hard in startups when shit hits the fan, when youāre helpless. I think if you believe in a mission, you stick with it. You power through walls, bang your head against the wall until you break through. So I think thatās the key. If youāre not mission aligned, if youāre looking at it financially, then when things get hard, you abandon it.', 'person': 'Vinod Khosla', 'source': 'https://www.thetwentyminutevc.com/vinodkhosla/'}, {'text': 'Being a fast mover and being decisive\u200aā\u200ait is very hard to be successful and not have those traits as a founder. Why that is, Iām not perfectly clear on, but I think it is something . . . about the only advantage that startups have or the biggest advantage that startups have over large companies is agility, speed, willing to make non consensus, concentrated bets, incredible focus.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://conversationswithtyler.com/episodes/sam-altman/'}], 'people': ['Alexandr Wang', 'Bill Walsh', 'Brian Chesky', 'Doug Leone', 'Elon Musk', 'Eric Glyman', 'Garry Tan', 'Jacob Peters', 'Jessica Livingston', 'Keith Rabois', 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'Paul Graham', 'Roelof Botha', 'Sam Altman', 'Vinod Khosla'], 'sources': ['http://www.paulgraham.com/ace.html', 'http://www.paulgraham.com/marginal.html', 'http://www.paulgraham.com/startuplessons.html', 'http://www.paulgraham.com/startuplessons.html?viewfullsite=1', 'https://articles.sequoiacap.com/2018-06-20-doug-leone', 'https://conversationswithtyler.com/episodes/sam-altman/', 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles', 'https://nextplayso.substack.com/p/spotlight-superpower', 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/', 'https://twitter.com/alexandr_wang/status/1653943994769096707?s=20', 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281', 'https://www.amazon.fr/Score-Takes-Care-Itself-Philosophy/dp/1591843472', 'https://www.sequoiacap.com/podcast/training-data-eric-glyman/', 'https://www.thetwentyminutevc.com/vinodkhosla/', 'https://www.ycombinator.com/blog/jessica-livingston-on-htfbt/', 'https://www.ycombinator.com/library/6W-elon-musk-on-how-to-build-the-future', 'https://www.youtube.com/@The-Art-of-Hiring/videos', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fQHLK1aIBs&ab_channel=YCombinator%3ALive', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXubBqd8uXs', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZcTLjMTVZ4', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nQAZ3iV3gSg&list=TLGGp__Zzi2H69UzMTEwMjAyNA', 'https://x.com/garrytan/status/1849137742200135761']}
{'name': 'Sales š¤', 'count': 5, 'people_count': 3, 'sources_count': 3, 'quotes': [{'text': 'We had a lot of so-called back room scientists. In a conference, they would keep quiet. Three weeks later after a decision was made they filed a report saying why you should do so and so. Well, it was too late. They would not stand up right in the middle of a hot conference, in the middle of activity, and say, we should do this for these reasons. You need to master that form of communication as well as prepared speeches.', 'person': 'Richard Hamming', 'source': 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html'}, {'text': "I have now come down to a topic which is very distasteful; it is not sufficient to do a job, you have to sell it. Selling to a scientist is an awkward thing to do. It's very ugly; you shouldn't have to do it. The world is supposed to be waiting, and when you do something great, they should rush out and welcome it. But the fact is everyone is busy with their own work. You must present it so well that they will set aside what they are doing, look at what you've done, read it, and come back and say, yes, that was good. I suggest that when you open a journal, as you turn the pages, you ask why you read some articles and not others. You had better write your report so when it is published in the Physical Review, or wherever else you want it, as the readers are turning the pages they won't just turn your pages but they will stop and read yours. If they don't stop and read it, you won't get credit.", 'person': 'Richard Hamming', 'source': 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html'}, {'text': "A startup should be able to explain in one or two sentences exactly what it does. And not just to users. You need this for everyone: investors, acquirers, partners, reporters, potential employees, and even current employees. You probably shouldn't even start a company to do something that can't be described compellingly in one or two sentences.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/startuplessons.html'}, {'text': 'There are two things you have to do to make people pause. The most important is to explain, as concisely as possible, what the hell your site is about. How often have you visited a site that seemed to assume you already knew what they did?', 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/startuplessons.html'}, {'text': 'Curiosity about the customer problem is arguably most important thing while selling. They wonāt tell you outright enough information because all information compressions are bad. You need to really fill in the gaps in your understanding to be able to reconstruct an accurate decompressed image.', 'person': 'Alexandr Wang', 'source': 'https://alexw.substack.com/p/information-compression'}], 'people': ['Alexandr Wang', 'Paul Graham', 'Richard Hamming'], 'sources': ['http://www.paulgraham.com/startuplessons.html', 'https://alexw.substack.com/p/information-compression', 'https://www.cs.virginia.edu/~robins/YouAndYourResearch.html']}
{'name': 'Self-improvement š„', 'count': 4, 'people_count': 1, 'sources_count': 1, 'quotes': [{'text': 'Scrolling and reading too much drowns out your inner voice.', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'Know your ātriggersā / what makes you the worst version of yourself.', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'Being able to travel is one of the key ways the modern world is better than the old world. Learn to travel well. ', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'nvironment matters a lot; move to where you flourish maximally. Put yourself in environments where you have to perform to your utmost; if you can get by being average, you probably will. (Greek saying: āA captain only shows during a storm.ā)', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}], 'people': ['Nabeel S Quereshi'], 'sources': ['https://nabeelqu.co/principles']}
{'name': 'Sleeping better š“', 'count': 5, 'people_count': 4, 'sources_count': 4, 'quotes': [{'text': 'How I sleep perfect 7.5h at night - 3M E-A-R earplugs - Qatar Airways sleep mask (I tried the silk ones but they too soft they fall off) - separate duvets so you donāt wake each other up when moving - room at 18Ā°C + regular thick duvets (duvet adds 5Ā°C=23Ā°C) - black out curtains', 'person': 'Pieter Levels', 'source': 'https://x.com/levelsio/status/1680678195375349762?s=46&t=qgopL_Y6F84neSIfv-BoPA'}, {'text': "You should probably get something like that. Optimize your sleep. There's also cheaper ways of doing it; stuff like Eight Sleep, for example, it's like a really good mattress, there's Casper. Getting a really good mattress given that you're spending 33% of your time sleeping, very important, don't skimp on that. Even if it's whatever thousands of dollars, it's probably worth it if it gives you even 10% better sleep. If you have noisy things around children or construction or something, figure out how you can get either whether it's headphones or move or something to truly limit noise when sleeping, because you'll track your sleeping and you'll start to see those things that improve it. For example, cutting out drinking at night and so on. Okay.", 'person': 'Balaji Srinivasan', 'source': 'https://www.joincolossus.com/episodes/85214124/srinivasan-optimizing-your-inputs?tab=transcript'}, {'text': '[Napoleonās] flatterers, probably under the idea that sleep is incompatible with greatness, have evinced [a] disregard of truth in speaking of his night-watching. Bonaparte made others watch; but he himself slept, and slept well. His orders were that I should call him every morning at seven. I was, therefore, the first to enter his chamber; but very frequently when I awoke him, he would turn himself and say, āAh, Bourrienne! Let me lie a little longer.ā When there was no very pressing business, I did not disturb him again till eight oāclock. He in general slept seven hours out of the twenty-four, besides taking a short nap in the afternoon.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'As for moral courage, Napoleon said, he had rarely encountered the ācourage of 2 A.M.ā - that is, the extemporaneous courage which, even in the most sudden emergencies, leaves oneās freedom of mind, judgment, and decision completely unaffected. He asserted unequivocally that he had known himself to possess that 2 A.M. courage to a higher degree than any other man.', 'person': 'Napoleon', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230'}, {'text': 'Sleep seems to be the most important physical factor in productivity for me. Some sort of sleep tracker to figure out how to sleep best is helpful. Iāve found the only thing Iām consistent with are in the set-it-and-forget-it category, and I really like the Emfit QS+Activeā¦ I like a cold, dark, quiet room, and a great mattress (I resisted spending a bunch of money on a great mattress for years, which was stupidāit makes a huge difference to my sleep quality. I love this one). I use a Chili Pad to be cold while I sleep if I canāt get the room cold enough, which is great but loud (I set it up to have the cooler unit outside my room). When traveling, I use an eye mask and ear plugs.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/productivity'}], 'people': ['Balaji Srinivasan', 'Napoleon', 'Pieter Levels', 'Sam Altman'], 'sources': ['https://blog.samaltman.com/productivity', 'https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Napoleon-Selection-Written-Spoken/dp/0231085230', 'https://www.joincolossus.com/episodes/85214124/srinivasan-optimizing-your-inputs?tab=transcript', 'https://x.com/levelsio/status/1680678195375349762?s=46&t=qgopL_Y6F84neSIfv-BoPA']}
{'name': 'Speed & momentum šØ', 'count': 17, 'people_count': 7, 'sources_count': 9, 'quotes': [{'text': 'Donāt āslow downā as you get older, speed up. Lean into changes, be curious about new things. Most people seem to go the other way. ', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'Moving fast forces you to strip things down to the bare bones. ', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'Do things fast. Things donāt actually take much time (as measured by a stopwatch); resistance/procrastination does. āSlow is fakeā. If no urgency exists, impose some. ', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': "secret for moving fast at a startup: don't do tomorrow what could be done today", 'person': 'Greg Brockman', 'source': 'https://twitter.com/gdb/status/1720301087935086628'}, {'text': "To use a Facebook example again, when Facebookās growth slowed in 2008, mark instituted a\xa0'growth group.' They worked on very small things to make Facebook grow faster. All of these by themselves seemed really small, but they got the curve of Facebook back up. It quickly became the most prestigious group there. Mark has said that itās been one of Facebookās best innovations. According to friends of mine that worked at Facebook at the time, it really turned around the dynamic of the company. And it went from this thing where everyone was feeling bad, and momentum was gone, back to a place that was winning.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': "Another thing that youāll notice if you have momentum sag, is that everyone starts disagreeing about what to do. Fights come out when a company loses momentum.\xa0And so a framework for that that I think works is that when thereās disagreement among the team about what to do, then you ask your users and you do whatever your users tell you.\xa0And you have to remind people: 'hey, stuffās not working right now we donāt actually hate each other, we just need to get back on track and everything will work.' If you just call it out, if you just acknowledge that, youāll find that things get way better.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': 'If you do lose momentum, most founders try to get it back in the wrong way. They give these long speeches about vision for the company and try to rally the troops with speeches. But employees in a company where momentum has sagged, donāt want to hear that. You have to save the vision speeches for when the company is winning. When youāre not winning, you just have to get momentum back in small wins.\xa0A board member of mine used to say that sales fix everything in a startup. And that is really true.\xa0So you figure out where you can get these small wins and you get that done. And then youāll be amazed at how all the other problems in a startup disappear.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': 'So I mentioned this momentum and growth earlier. Once more: the momentum and growth are the lifeblood of startups. This is probably in the top three secrets of executing well. You want a company to be winning all the time. If you ever take your foot off the gas pedal, things will spiral out of control, snowball downwards. A winning team feels good and keeps winning. A team that hasnāt won in a while gets demotivated and keeps losing. So always keep momentum, itās this prime directive for managing a startup. If I can only tell founders one thing about how to run a company, it would be this.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': "When I was running my own company, we found out we were about to lose a deal. It was sort of this critical deal from the first big customer in the space. And it was going to go to this company that had been around for year before we were. And they had this like all locked up. And we called and said 'we have this better product you have to meet with us' and they said 'well weāre signing this deal tomorrow. sorry.' We drove to the airport, we got on a plane, we were at their office at 6am the next morning. We just sat there, they told us to go away, we just kept sitting there. Finally once of the junior guys decided to meet with us, after that, finally one of the senior guys decided to meet with us. They ended up ripping up the contract with the other company, and we closed the deal with them about a week later. And Iām sure, that had we not gotten on a plane, had we not shown up in person, that would not have worked out.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': "So speed is this huge premium. The best founders usually respond to e-mail the most quickly, make decisions most quickly, they're generally quick in all of these ways. And they had this do what ever it takes attitude. They also show up a lot. They come to meetings, they come in, they meet us in person. One piece of advice that I have thatās always worked for me: they get on planes in marginal situations.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': "The best founders work on things that seem small but they move really quickly. But they get things done really quickly. Every time you talk to the best founders they've gotten new things done. In fact, this is the one thing that we learned best predicts a success of founders in YC. If every time we talk to a team they've gotten new things done, that's the best predictor we have that a company will be successful. Part of this is that you can do huge things in incremental pieces. If you keep knocking down small chunks one at a time, in a year you look back and you've done this amazing thing. On the other hand, if you disappear for a year and you expect to come back with something amazing all at once, it usually never happens.", 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/'}, {'text': 'A maniacal sense of urgency is our operating principle.', 'person': 'Elon Musk', 'source': 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281'}, {'text': "As with exercise, improvements beget improvements. If you run every day, you'll probably feel like running tomorrow. But if you skip running for a couple weeks, it will be an effort to drag yourself out. So it is with hacking: the more ideas you implement, the more ideas you'll have. You should make your system better at least in some small way every day or two.", 'person': 'Paul Graham', 'source': 'http://www.paulgraham.com/startuplessons.html'}, {'text': 'urgency is a hell of a drug if you find yourself addicted to the feeling that every moment countsācherish it. urgency will feel quite unreasonable to most. as a general rule, most of the world is slow. ignore them. run fast. do something that shoots electricity into your veins', 'person': 'Alexandr Wang', 'source': 'https://twitter.com/alexandr_wang/status/1640898775836241922?s=20'}, {'text': 'truly, bias for actionāmore than any other traitāis the trait that seems most correlated with success and impact it is SO much better to be constantly shipping, making mistakes, and learning than to be smart, cynical, paralyzed & inert get out thereāgo do some shit!', 'person': 'Alexandr Wang', 'source': 'https://twitter.com/alexandr_wang/status/1639721577431597056?s=20'}, {'text': 'But big things can always start small. And almost everything can be demonstrated in hours-to-days.', 'person': 'Amjad Masad', 'source': 'https://twitter.com/amasad/status/1663332051582619648'}, {'text': 'This is very specific to St. Louis, but I think it may be true of other cities in the Midwest that were once growing and prosperous and now are less so. Iām such a believer that momentum is, at all levels of organization\u200aā\u200aan individualās life, a company, a city, a country\u200aā\u200ais so important, even though cities seem eternal and indestructible in a way that not many things\u200aā\u200amaybe religions also are.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://conversationswithtyler.com/episodes/sam-altman/'}], 'people': ['Alexandr Wang', 'Amjad Masad', 'Elon Musk', 'Greg Brockman', 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'Paul Graham', 'Sam Altman'], 'sources': ['http://www.paulgraham.com/startuplessons.html', 'https://conversationswithtyler.com/episodes/sam-altman/', 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles', 'https://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec02/', 'https://twitter.com/alexandr_wang/status/1639721577431597056?s=20', 'https://twitter.com/alexandr_wang/status/1640898775836241922?s=20', 'https://twitter.com/amasad/status/1663332051582619648', 'https://twitter.com/gdb/status/1720301087935086628', 'https://www.amazon.com/Elon-Musk-Walter-Isaacson/dp/1982181281']}
{'name': 'Work-life balance āļø ', 'count': 4, 'people_count': 4, 'sources_count': 4, 'quotes': [{'text': 'I think the majority of people believe a balanced life leads to happiness and achieving goals. In reality, a disbalanced life allows you to achieve goals more effectively. The more imbalanced and focused you are on your goals, sacrificing everything else, the more likely youāll succeedāand it might bring happiness.', 'person': 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'source': 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXubBqd8uXs'}, {'text': "I just interviewed the cofounder of Netflix, Marc Randolph, for the Whoop podcast. He had a good quote, which was: 'Make sure when youāre not working, youāre actually not working.' Itās so easy to be a bit spaced out in your personal life, thinking about work or actually doing work on your phone when youāre supposed to be at dinner with your wife or your friend. Thatās something Iāve tried to improve over the years ā how to be as present as possible.", 'person': 'Will Ahmed', 'source': 'https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/lifestyle/article/will-ahmed-whoop-tips-for-success'}, {'text': 'Itās important to take care of yourself. I try to exercise four times a week. I take all of my vacation. I work some weekends but you wonāt find me at a black-tie. I spend time with my family. I read and I eat right. You have to take care of your mind, body, spirit, soul, friends and family.', 'person': 'Jamie Dimon', 'source': 'https://www.jpmorganchase.com/news-stories/what-high-school-students-learn-from-jamie-dimon'}, {'text': 'Donāt neglect your family and friends for the sake of productivityāthatās a very stupid tradeoff (and very likely a net productivity loss, because youāll be less happy). Donāt neglect doing things you love or that clear your head either.', 'person': 'Sam Altman', 'source': 'https://blog.samaltman.com/productivity'}], 'people': ['Jamie Dimon', 'Nikolay Storonsky', 'Sam Altman', 'Will Ahmed'], 'sources': ['https://blog.samaltman.com/productivity', 'https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/lifestyle/article/will-ahmed-whoop-tips-for-success', 'https://www.jpmorganchase.com/news-stories/what-high-school-students-learn-from-jamie-dimon', 'https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXubBqd8uXs']}
{'name': 'Writing āļø', 'count': 3, 'people_count': 2, 'sources_count': 2, 'quotes': [{'text': 'Think in writing. Write Google Docs, scrawl in notebooks. This extends working memory arbitrarily and allows your thoughts to compound on each other. (āThe difference between a Turing machine and a finite state machine is the tape.ā)', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'When writing, separate the ācreatorā and the āeditorā. The ācreatorā just writes, and doesnāt worry about quality; the goal is words on the page. Later, you can be the āeditorā and shape it into something good.', 'person': 'Nabeel S Quereshi', 'source': 'https://nabeelqu.co/principles'}, {'text': 'Business writing is a customer service problem. Youāre not the starāthe reader is. Help them get what they want, as quickly and effectively as possible. They might want to solve a problem. They might want to be persuaded. Give āem the goods.', 'person': 'Naval Ravikant', 'source': 'https://venturehacks.com/writing'}], 'people': ['Nabeel S Quereshi', 'Naval Ravikant'], 'sources': ['https://nabeelqu.co/principles', 'https://venturehacks.com/writing']}
All Collections
Sort by Default
Sort by Effectiveness
Sort by Newest
Clear Filters Ć